Geekbabe
Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Originally posted by: Howard
It's a "problem" easily solvable by the woman.Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: JS80
The ONLY technical reason for marriage is children and estate protection.
Marriage isn't right for everyone, never said it was.
I'm just giving the technical reason. I could care less who gets married.
Like Nik said, there is no logical reason for a piece of paper that says you're married. It's to have children and protect your estate. Without that reason it's just a social construction that detriments the male party.
As opposed to shacking up which primarily benefits the male.
I don't see how not being married would somehow give the male an advantage while getting married would make it an even playing field.![]()
A man shacks up with a woman he gets
Steady sex, hot on the half shell
cooking, cleaning, laundry and other domestic services
half the rent, utilities and other bills, if he's really slick he can get the gal to support him while he's still in school.
The woman gets.... older
If a woman wants children and will only consider having them within a marriage, shacking up long term with anybody isn't in her best interests
exactly, no long term living together.. like daddy used to say "why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free ?"
