Question Raptor Lake - Official Thread

Page 104 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hulk

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,225
2,015
136
Since we already have the first Raptor Lake leak I'm thinking it should have it's own thread.
What do we know so far?
From Anandtech's Intel Process Roadmap articles from July:

Built on Intel 7 with upgraded FinFET
10-15% PPW (performance-per-watt)
Last non-tiled consumer CPU as Meteor Lake will be tiled

I'm guessing this will be a minor update to ADL with just a few microarchitecture changes to the cores. The larger change will be the new process refinement allowing 8+16 at the top of the stack.

Will it work with current z690 motherboards? If yes then that could be a major selling point for people to move to ADL rather than wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vstar

poke01

Senior member
Mar 8, 2022
736
712
106
Your physics is incorrect here, in your example above the i9 will output 250w per second vs 230w for Zen4. Power(W) = heat output per second (Jules per second). The temperature of the heat source doesn't matter. The total heat output is what matter to increasing the room temperature. And secondly, the 95C is the hot-spot temperature of the die. The temperature of the heat-sink will be much lower.
okay thanks for correcting me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustViewing

poke01

Senior member
Mar 8, 2022
736
712
106
Nobody have asked but my PBO enabled Zen4 is getting these Cinebench R23 MT numbers at the following packet power limits: (PPT)

38.7k points @ 122w
33.5k points @ 80w
24.8k points @ 50w
18.5k points @ 35w
yeah thats impressive. Zen 4 is efficient for sure. Can you please tell temps? 85C?
 

Det0x

Golden Member
Sep 11, 2014
1,031
2,962
136
Are these watts real power drawn by the CPU? If yes, these numbers would be very impressive. Is the CPU tweaked somehow - undervolted?
Just PBO CO enabled, i shared results here in the "PES-assessing-power-and-performance-efficiency-of-x86-cpu-architectures" thread.

yeah thats impressive. Zen 4 is efficient for sure. Can you please tell temps? 85C?
At these lower power figures with my large custom watercooling i think i was well below 50 degrees.
 

Kocicak

Senior member
Jan 17, 2019
982
973
136
Actually there may be a direct physical link between change of information happening in the processor (being linked to change of entropy) and energy, but it is safe to presume that almost all the energy consumed by the CPU gets converted to heat.
 
Last edited:

LightningZ71

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2017
1,627
1,898
136
Hmm... There's some form of output energy other than heat? I thought power loss of CPUs is ~ 99.9999....%
A non-zero percentage of the input power onto the processor "system" is converted to useful work.the rest is dissipated primarily as heat but is also emitted in various forms of electromagnetic radiation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,140
2,154
136
Not good at all, if this is i9+Unlimited power option.


This is a 45% speedup over 12900k: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-7950x/7.html

It's a good result for Raptor Lake.


Ok..... this is the most shocking news to me

13400/F are not fully rebranded, only part of it belongs to ADL(C0). L3 cache size is the same but L2 is likely different.
Share same name but different performance??? Or else, perf are the same dispite L2 difference?


It comes from a support list. To me it makes no sense that the 13400 partially gets (the better?) B0 whereas 13600/13500 won't get.
 

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2019
3,330
5,281
136
@deasd @mikk
@Exist50


The 13600 and below are Alder Lake in built with Golden Cove cores(1.25MiB L2$) and OG Gracemont Cores(with 2MiB L2$). You can call them Rebranded Alder Lake or Alder Lake+ Or Golden Cove+ cores.


In the Red Square GB5 is reading the Gracemong System$ subsystem

13600
1665758662395.png

vs

13600K
1665758912447.png

1665760444605.png


If we compare the 13600 and the 13900K Memory Subsystems reading on GB5 You will clearly notice that the 13600K is using Raptormont cores(4MiB L2$) and the 13600 is using OG Gracemont cores 2MiB L2$
 
Last edited:

Shivansps

Diamond Member
Sep 11, 2013
3,855
1,518
136
In 3DMark? Sure. We all know how Intel likes to churn out meaningless redults in synthetics 😅

It would depend on the game, yet at 2100mhz OC the RPL igp has about 95% of the perf in W3 1080P and about 75% of 1080 Shadow of the Tomb Raider compared to a stock 5700G.

Ryzen 7000 IGP from what i saw is just a little better than a vega 3. Problem being the minimal L2 cache as well, not only the 2 CUs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2019
3,330
5,281
136
I'm talking about the Raptor Lake version of the 13400.
There is NO Raptor Cove version of the 13400, All CPUs below 13600K use Golden Cove Cores with 1.25 L2$.

What would be easier, Mask, Print Raptor Cove along with Raptormont so later they will just laser off 0.75MiB on each P core and then laser off 2MiB on the e cores...OR... Use existing Golden Cove/Gracemont masks??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

Kaluan

Senior member
Jan 4, 2022
500
1,071
96
Ugh... temperature ≠ heat
This is a similar misunderstanding of physics that got carried into the "common sense", just like how people misatribute weight to what mass is.

Not good at all, if this is i9+Unlimited power option.

If the clock data means the average between the 8 P cores and 16 E cores than it might actually be overclocked too (> (5.5x8+4,3x16)/24), the 7950X one seems about right, 5,1x GHz is the typical all core average for a stock setup.