sao123
Lifer
- May 27, 2002
- 12,653
- 205
- 106
Originally posted by: Garth
That's absurd on it's face. First you admit that Jesus'words are not literal, and then you claim that the entire Bible is literal. Aren't Jesus' words part of the Bible?Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
To be Christian all that is necessary is that you accept the Divinity of Christ as the Son of God. Belief or disbelief in a literal interpretation of Genesis has no bearing on whether or not one is Christian.Originally posted by: sao123
Proof that churches are evolving into a religion that is not christianity...
ZV
I disagree...
Jesus was the only person in the bible to speak in parables, and Jesus clearly did not write genesis... Moses did. 2 Timothy says that all scripture is given by God and the bible adamently states that God cannot lie.
So unless you want to call God a liar...
I have no alternative to taking the entire bible as literal.
And FWIW, it is the creationists that make their God out to be a liar, for they claim that he must be deceptive in his handiwork: the universe and the life within it. In other words, unless God is a liar, then the earth must be much older than 10,000 years. Unless God is a liar, then humans and other primates share a common ancestor. It would be deceptive of him to create a universe where things appear to be one way but are in fact another.
Only man would assume that they can know more than God. On several occasions throughout the bible, that the persuit of "knowledge" is not something to be desired.
And that God would shame those who think they are wise.
