TampaVote: Dispatches from the Ground
Bernestine Singley, volunteered as a Mobile Field Attorney with Election Protection in Tampa, Florida, to help combat wide-scale vote suppression in communities of color.
Heeding the Call: `Vote or Die'
The proportion of voters 18 to 29 years old did not change, because fired-up older voters came out in record numbers. But the estimated 21 million young people who voted was 4.6 million more than in 2000, according to the University of Maryland's Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
Part of the reason Miami-Dade had a turnout of 73.4 percent was because of people like Sedrick Ham, an unemployed 21-year-old who has a brother in jail. "This war's not right," said Sedrick, who said he has been unable to find work at warehouses and carpeting companies. "Innocent people are dying over there, and there's no jobs in this area."
It was because of people like Derrick Walker, 21, a curbside ticket agent at the Miami airport and father of a 3-month-old daughter, who said he was angry that it seemed so easy for Bush to send working-class and poor men and women off to war. He was so angry it was worth missing four hours of work and maybe $50 in tips. "It's a sacrifice, but it's more important to vote than to worry about my little tip."
Some of the young black men said the civic campaign of hip-hop artists kept voting in their heads. "If Puff Daddy says it's serious to vote, I figured it must be," said Dontrell Pray, 19, a shelf stocker at a grocery store. Others, like Ham and Darrell Bilisle, 18, a high school senior concerned about teen pregnancy, poor school security, and the dropout rate, were brought to the polls by their mothers.
On Media and the Election
by Robert W. McChesney
Perhaps the most important function our media serves is to provide voters with the information they need to make sound decisions in the voting booth. If people don't know what they're voting for, our democracy is in serious trouble.
Unfortunately, it appears that we're in serious trouble.
This election has been marked by a staggering amount of voter ignorance. Polls show that voters -- especially Bush supporters -- were grossly misinformed about their candidate's position on a broad range of issues. Surveying supporters of the President, a University of Maryland PIPA/ Knowledge Networks poll found:
* 72% still believe that there were WMD's in Iraq.
* 75% believe that Iraq was providing substantial support for Al Qaeda.
* 66% believe that Bush supports participation in the International Criminal Court.
* 72% believe that he supports the treaty banning land mines.
The catch? None of these statements are true.
How do we know who our candidates are and what they stand for when the media fixates on polls, controversy and spin instead of the issues? How do we have meaningful elections when people don't know what they're voting for? Our Founders understood this; that is why they inscribed freedom of the press into the First Amendment of the constitution.
An iron law in commercial broadcasting is that you do not do programming that undermines the credibility of your sponsors. The result: more political ads and little-to-no critical journalism that exposes the spin and lies in these TV ads.
Now is the time to plug in and take action to create a better media system so that when the next big election comes along, Americans actually have a clue about what their candidates stand for. Pass this along, become an e-activist at
www.freepress.net, and tell you friends to get involved. As Saul Alinsky put it, the only way to beat organized money is with organized people. Remember this, act on it, and we will prevail.
"How I Stole Your Election" by George W. Bush
The first thing I did to steal your election was to make friends with ALL the manufacturers and code-verifyers of the Electronic Voting Machines. They were really nice, especially Diebold who gave me $600,000 for my campaign. Wow, thanks dude!
WATCH THIS SPECIAL ELECTION FILM NOW!
Votergate is the investigative documentary feature film uncovering the truth about new computer voting systems, which allow a few powerful corporations to record our votes in secret. But Votergate is not just a warning. The film strongly concludes that elections are harder to defraud when voters turn out in big numbers.
Evidence of a Second Bush Coup?
Theoretically at least, it is conceivable that sophisticated CIA-style computer hacking ? known as ?cyber-warfare? ? could have let George W. Bush?s campaign transform a three-percentage-point defeat, as measured by exit polls, into an official victory of about the same margin.
Glitch could force NC to vote again
Counties will add totals from as many as 75,000 provisional ballots to their returns today. If the final margin in any race is within 4,532 -- the number of lost votes in Carteret -- the losing candidate can file a protest with the N.C. State Board of Election.
MIAMI -- Judge Rejects Suit Over Uncounted Absentee Ballots
Election officials will not be forced to count absentee ballots delivered after 7 p.m. on Election Day, regardless of what problems caused late mailings, a federal judge ruled Tuesday in a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Soooooo, if you want to suppress votes in a district, just mail them their absentee ballots late and the courts will say it's okay to ignore them when they get sent back late.
12,000 Votes In Gaston County Uncounted
Page says officials failed to release the votes from the machine on which they were stored into the database where votes were tallied. She says the votes are still in the computer system.
7% turnout in Cleveland precinct ?
55 precincts in Cleveland show a turnout of less than 40%. Several show a turnout of less than 20%, and one even shows a turnout of 7%. That's right, SEVEN PERCENT. Despite reports of very strong ground efforts, record turnouts, and long lines throughout Cleveland, 60, 70, 80, even 90+% of the people who took the time to register didn't bother to show up?!? Or did they? Was there massive voter suppression in these precincts? Were voters in these precincts forced to vote via provisional ballots, ballots that are not audited in Ohio, so that we have no way of knowing how many were cast?
Here's the dead giveaway of the election fraud
the 11th hour turnaround
These things always start out with our guy winning in the exit polls then they results magically "turn around" late into the race.
There is a reason for that - you can't steal votes up front. You have to know how many to steal. If you don't steal enough, then you have to go back in and steal aggregiously. This is probably what happened with the Ohio small districts.
So you have to steal at about 60 - 80 results range. too early and you might do it wrong, too late and the numbers look too wrong.
Presidential Results and Discussion (democraticunderground.com forum)
BASED ON EXIT POLLS, THE PROBABILITY KERRY WOULD LOSE OH AND FL: 0.15%
That's less than 1/6 of one percent!
To put it another way, the chances are 1 out of 667 that Bush would win BOTH states.
Assuming a 2% MoE for the exit polls (they are much more accurate than standard polls), the probabilities are:
Ohio Exit Poll:
Kerry 52 - Bush 48
Prob (Kerry wins OH)= 97.7%
Florida Exit Poll:
Kerry 51 - Bush 48
Prob (Kerry wins FL)= 93.5%
Then
Prob (Kerry loses FL and OH) =0.15% = (1-.977)*(1-.935)
Prob(Kerry wins OH or FL or Both)= 99.85% = 1 -.15%
How did I calculate the probs?
Simple. Feed the data into the Excel Normal Distribution function:
Since the MoE = .02, the Standard Deviation is .02/1.96 = .01
Prob (Kerry wins OH)= NORMDIST(0.52,0.5,0.01,TRUE) = 97.7%
Prob (Kerry wins FL)= NORMDIST(51/99,0.5,0.01,TRUE) = 93.5%