• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

POLL: Why the hell is the US still changing clocks twice/year?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Abolish "winter time" and "summer time"

  • No opinion, or next two answers aren't applicable

  • Keep as is

  • Stop it. No more clocks going back and forward again

Results are only viewable after voting.
Muse said:
I don't know, yes it's a hassle, I made a list today... finally. I have 12 things to change. I've still got a few to go. Used to not be such a big deal but nowadays there are so many devices that have to be set to the right time. It's not for my convenience, I think it's probably more for commercial purposes for which it probably makes sense. If it enhances productivity it's worth it, being the thinking.
Click to expand...

Thankfully I use devices that automatically set the time. Aside from a wristwatch, what doesn't?
Though I don't think China and India doing it would factor in at all for me. I do like the idea of leaving it alone. Summer time ofc.
 
They ought to simply re-designate the sun's mid-point in the sky (averaged out for each of the 4 "U.S. Lower 48" time zones) as being "12:00 Noon". Change other schedules, such as the time the school bus picks up, the airline schedules, the time you want to eat your daily meals, milk your dairy cows, etc. to whatever seems best. But quit changing what time "12:00 Noon" is.
That way, there'd be no location in the "U.S. Lower 48" where "12:00 Noon" would be more than 30 minutes off. With the exception of keeping the same time zone statewide, for any particular state. But keep certain wider states as dual time zones (such as Kansas and Nebraska) that straddle the dividing point between Central and Mountain time zones.
 
JimmiG said:
I kind of like it. Gives me more sunlight in the evening after work when I actually have the time to enjoy it. In the morning I just eat breakfast and rush to the bus, so sunlight or not doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what daylight saving time does. Gives you more sunlight in the evening/less in the morning. I feel we should move permanently to DST.
 
Last edited:
Seriously, keep it at DST or summer time. I don't give two shits about it being dark when I'm out in the morning. Hell, the sun doesn't really come out until 8am deep in the winter.
 
it isn't really a big deal
but i see no reason for the gubberment to have laws regarding time keeping
 
IndyColtsFan said:
It is really stupid. Up until 2005, Indiana wasn't observing DST and it was great. It changed because the governor and others convinced people it would save Indiana money in electricity costs.

A study a couple years ago found that it actually cost us more money. Thanks guys!
Click to expand...

I thought it was changed because some parts of Indiana observed it while the capital and majority of the state did not. Therefore they changed it so that all of Indiana would be on the same exact schedule.

-Lothar
 
I love people whining about the "hassle" involved. Unless you own an antique clock store, the absolute most amount of time you had to put into anything was about 3 minutes this morning.
 
Personally, I agree, changing the clocks twice a year is a waste. I would prefer the extra daylight at the end of the day. Then I can golf later in the afternoon (twilight rates start at 2PM & are much less than day rates) .. But families with kids, do not want them traveling to school in the AM when it is dark. So they need it the other way around. You can't please everybody.
 
Get rid of timezones altogether. There is only one time, GMT. Use it. The scientific community has been doing this forever.

Using timezones and this atrocity known as DST is like using Imperial units and Metric together. People do that too. D:
 
lothar said:
I thought it was changed because some parts of Indiana observed it while the capital and majority of the state did not. Therefore they changed it so that all of Indiana would be on the same exact schedule.

-Lothar
Click to expand...
Not quite. Several counties of Indiana near Chicago still keep same as Chicago (Central Daylight Time) time, year round, as they always have. So: whereas previously those counties were the same as Indianapolis (then: Eastern Standard Time) for only 1/2 the year, they're now 1 hour behind Indianapolis (now: Eastern Daylight Time) and the rest of the counties for the entire year.

Also: a large portion of NE Arizona under control of the Navajo Nation keeps Mountain Daylight Time, same as Colorado. But smaller land parcels there under Hopi Nation control keeps Mountain Standard Time, same time as southern Arizona.
 
Last edited:
Do away with clocks entirely. All they really tell you is that you failing to satisfy someone else's agenda. Non-sentient agents of control. Punch them in the face.
 
Slick5150 said:
I love people whining about the "hassle" involved. Unless you own an antique clock store, the absolute most amount of time you had to put into anything was about 3 minutes this morning.
Click to expand...

But that means they lost an hour AND three minutes, rather than just an hour. That's 5% more time lost.
 
I think it's a stupid tradition.
It has been demonstrated that you don't spare electricity.
Also lots of people are awake between 6 am and 12 pm. Having more sunlight at the start or at the end doesn't change jackshit.

It should be abolished in the whole world.
 
Slick5150 said:
I love people whining about the "hassle" involved. Unless you own an antique clock store, the absolute most amount of time you had to put into anything was about 3 minutes this morning.
Click to expand...

They're addicts, they need constant outrage in their lives.

If they had something important to do with their lives, they'd be doing that instead of complaining on internet forums 😛
 
I never understood the whole "saves energy" thing. No it does not. All it's doing is shifting when we use electricity, and really this is only specific to lighting, which is a small percentage of electricity usage especially with CFL and LED lighting being bigger now. Commercial buildings being bigger users than residential tend to have lights on all day so it's not like it matters if it's dark or not.

Sure it sucks when it's dark early but DST does not even fix that, it just slightly offsets it. It's still pitch black in the morning when I go to work and it's still pitch black when I get out of work, unless we start changing the clocks by several hours, it's not going to change that fact and I sure as hell would not want to do that.
 
Red Squirrel said:
I never understood the whole "saves energy" thing. No it does not. All it's doing is shifting when we use electricity, and really this is only specific to lighting, which is a small percentage of electricity usage especially with CFL and LED lighting being bigger now. Commercial buildings being bigger users than residential tend to have lights on all day so it's not like it matters if it's dark or not.

Sure it sucks when it's dark early but DST does not even fix that, it just slightly offsets it. It's still pitch black in the morning when I go to work and it's still pitch black when I get out of work, unless we start changing the clocks by several hours, it's not going to change that fact and I sure as hell would not want to do that.
Click to expand...
What I've seen is that the savings are found in usage habits. For example, if people are more likely to be outside as a result of the relative shift in daylight hours, they'll not be inside using electricity on lighting or indoor recreation.
And some commercial buildings, though not many, do have auto-dimming lights working in tandem with skylights.

What I've seen though is that the savings are <1%, though when spread across something like a national power grid, that's still a lot of megawatts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top