Palin says: "Obama pals around with terrorists"

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn


NO ONE is suggesting that Obama is a terrorist because he knows Ayers either. We are questioning his judgement. And there are real questions about Obama's leftist views.


.

Oh, please...you know better than that, don't you?

The McCain surrogates, particularly Sarah Palin has been strongly suggesting this for some time.

McCain himself claims he's declared this kind of bullplop attack "off-limits"; however, Palin and others have been whipping up the mobs with this line every chance they get.

 

[ProfJohn]

Feral, provide me with proof that Palin is suggesting that Obama IS a terrorist.

What she said

"Our opponent ... is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country." She also said, "This is not a man who sees America as you see America and as I see America."

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Presuming Obama was well aware of his terrorist past, it just proves he is brilliant! He can appoint him head of homeland security. Can't you see the logic? Home owners often hire companies run by former thieves to secure their homes. Why? Because you need someone that thinks like a thief. Who better to prevent terrorism, than a terrorist? He knows how they think, he is in their heads!

Ridiculous commentary for a ridiculous "issue".

Now matter how many pics of Obama looking Muslim are shown, no matter how many usages of his middle name, no matter how many scare mongering stories emerge, this guy is your next president. I won't tell you to take that to the bank though, that is a shakier proposition than my assertion. 😉

I will be posting quotes from those who have lambasted others critical of the current administration, with accusations of "hating America" "not supporting our troops" and other such idiotic accusations, when they start in on the Obama administration in similar fashion. The pot meet kettle hypocrisy of politics plays out every time the mascot changes. The predictable apples to oranges defense will be at play more than U.S. Open tennis balls.

 

[feralkid]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Feral, provide me with proof that Palin is suggesting that Obama IS a terrorist.

What she said

"Our opponent ... is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country." She also said, "This is not a man who sees America as you see America and as I see America."

It's a little concept called "guilt by association".

 

[Throckmorton]

Originally posted by: RKDaley

Originally posted by: Throckmorton

Originally posted by: chess9
Funny piece!

I don't care what you deluded left wing whackos think, Obama is a Black Muslim Terrorist and Commie Symp. The evidence is everywhere. Why won't you open your eyes?

NB: See, extended writings of Butterbean, Wheezer, CKG, and others holding AK47s and crouched in their bomb shelters.

-Robert

You know what makes me depressed about the future of this country? You don't know enough about the world around you to realize that being a Muslim terrorist and a commie are mutually exclusive. One is left wing, one is right wing. Why isn't that obvious to you? Did the education system just fail you, or what?

Re-read bolded and check your sarcasm meter.

My bad, I was so angry I only skimmed the rest of the post.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

This is all rolling back to Iraq and 9/11. It was, to my knowledge, never openly directly connected. BUT, they (the psycho-cons) implied the living shit out of it. They figured the more the public hears 9/11 and Iraq in close proximity, the more likely they are to swallow the bait.
Same theory applies here, the more they mention Barack with Ayers, the more likely the public is going to assume Senator Obama's making pipe bombs in his basement, readying them to lay waste to the Pentagon.
That is very. very sad, and a sign of a very desperate candidate. Poor little Caribou Barbie can't compete, so she must smear. Pathetic.

 

[BMW540I6speed]

Maybe McCain and Palin will bring some of their most faithful followers to future debates and press confrerence's

McCain can bring buckets of chum to heave out into their midst. He can emerge from backstage wearing an executioner's hood and breeches - except that the hood will be a perfect white - chest bared as he drags the buckets of assorted carion out into the middle of the "townhall" floor.

Then, with dry, cracked hands, he can scoop the wads of fetid carnage from the buckets, dripping with rancid fluid, and flick them out to his rabidly barking and braying minions, who will snap the flesh out of the air with tendon-bulging necks and gleaming, protruding teeth, thrashing to tear the carnal delights from one another as they glare sideways with wild boar eyes.

They must be fed, or they turn on their masters.

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
Maybe McCain and Palin will bring some of their most faithful followers to future debates and press conference's

McCain can bring buckets of chum to heave out into their midst. He can emerge from backstage wearing an executioner's hood and breeches - except that the hood will be a perfect white - chest bared as he drags the buckets of assorted carrion out into the middle of the "town hall" floor.

Then, with dry, cracked hands, he can scoop the wads of fetid carnage from the buckets, dripping with rancid fluid, and flick them out to his rabidly barking and braying minions, who will snap the flesh out of the air with tendon-bulging necks and gleaming, protruding teeth, thrashing to tear the carnal delights from one another as they glare sideways with wild boar eyes.

They must be fed, or they turn on their masters.

Clive Barker posts here? :beer:

 

[jman19]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: jman19

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

As usual, PJ can't make a claim with any sort of evidence, so he'll just ask an "innocent" question and run away. Talk about pathetic and transparent tactics.

As usual - leftists ignore the real questions and instead keep trying to kill that strawman they erected around this issue, divert, or attack the closest non-leftist.

I'm not trying to divert anything you fool, I am clearly commenting on PJs attempt to raise an issue without presenting any information himself. I can't make a thread about it, beacuse that would be a callout. If that's too confusing for you and causes you to be "diverted," I truly feel sorry for you.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Robor

Originally posted by: DealMonkey

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Again, there are some right-wing people digging into this and they have found more - however - YOU people and the MSM dismiss it due to it's source. That's why the mainstream should do this so we can come closer to the real "truth".

*sigh* Okay, I'll bite: What have these right-wing people found exactly?

Crickets? :laugh:

:roll:

Here's one quick run down of 10 reasons he's not just some "guy in the neighborhood"


But again, much of even those details haven't been looked into and there are other "reports" from other right-wing sources that dive alot more into individual "coincidences".

Nice source. You expect us or anyone to believe it's credible? Is Larry Johnson still claiming there's that tape of Michelle? :roll:

 

[Throckmorton]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Do you think the same criteria should apply to McCain? His supporters better hope not because McCain's associated with far worse.

What is "far worse" than a domestic terrorist?

Racists, Frauds, Foreign Terrorists, Adulteresses, etc. Kind of sounds like the company Jesus kept back in the day.

That's what I thought about when I saw your post about reporters' work being compiled. Pretty ironic stuff

 

[TheSlamma]

Proof Christians only forgive peoples past when it helps them out.. which in turn is proof of Social Darwinism.

 

[WHAMPOM]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

"HOT OFF THE PRESS!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!"
"Parody of McSame's double standard make Poofjohn boil over."

 

[Lemon law]

Palin's problem, it a nutshell, is that she does not pal around with enough people who think for themselves.

 

[DealMonkey]

Is this the sort of juvenile nonsense McCain/Palin supporters are reduced to? Calling Obama a terrorist? Lame, so very lame.

:thumbsdown:

Good luck in November, morons!

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: WHAMPOM

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

"HOT OFF THE PRESS!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!"
"Parody of McSame's double standard make Poofjohn boil over."

I wonder how he'll react when he learns Sarah Palin is fucking a traitor?

 

[WHAMPOM]

Originally posted by: Jschmuck2

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: chess9
Funny piece!

I don't care what you deluded left wing whackos think, Obama is a Black Muslim Terrorist and Commie Symp. The evidence is everywhere. Why won't you open your eyes?

NB: See, extended writings of Butterbean, Wheezer, CKG, and others holding AK47s and crouched in their bomb shelters.

-Robert

Not only that but his fellow Traveler, John McCain, was the guest of Communists for 5 years!:shocked:

Oooh. Food for thought. What's to say, since we all know of John McCains five year relationship with hardline Communists, that he himself is not one?

sTOCKHOLM sYNDROME you say? Was his attempt at cAMPAIGN fINANCE rEFORM a sure show of his sECRET cOMUNIST sYMPATHIES?

 

[WHAMPOM]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: WHAMPOM

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

"HOT OFF THE PRESS!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!"
"Parody of McSame's double standard make Poofjohn boil over."

I wonder how he'll react when he learns Sarah Palin is fucking a traitor?

Nothing can put a crack in his Ivory Tower.

 

[imported_Infidel]

My thoughts, not worth much.

The definition of terrorist is pretty subjective, some would consider Ayers a patriot of such magnitude that he was willing to fight the government to affect change he felt was right, no different from our patriot forefathers that rebelled against the crown. This is not a defense of his actions, just a comment on how it can be perceived in different ways. That being said, an association today doesn't imply you agree with someones ideas. Ayers probably has a lot of admirable qualities, the obvious love of his country being a major one. Why would someone be criticized for associating with someone that loves their country that much? Considering how much the right loves to label anyone that disagrees with Bush policies a terrorist, what meaning does the word even have today?

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

When did Walter Annenberg learn that Ayers had been a terrorist? And what was his reaction?
When did Annenberg's widow and the head of the Annenberg Foundation, Leonore Annenberg learn that Ayers had been a terrorist? And what was her reaction? And did that reaction come before or after she endorsed John McCain?

 

[WHAMPOM]

Just think how many war protestors from the sixties can be tared with the "TERRORIST" brush.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Just think how many war protestors from the sixties can be tared with the "TERRORIST" brush.

That is the whole idea behind this. That's why we're told that other guilts-by-association, like McCain with Keating and Palin with the AIP, don't matter. It's because the context behind those are not the same. The Boomers are reliving the 60s and dragging us along with it. First, it was Vietnam/Iraq, now it's the '68 election. Next is the '69 recession and the tough economy of the '70s, if we let this go on.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Just think how many war protestors from the sixties can be tared with the "TERRORIST" brush.

That is the whole idea behind this. That's why we're told that other guilts-by-association, like McCain with Keating and Palin with the AIP, don't matter. It's because the context behind those are not the same. The Boomers are reliving the 60s and dragging us along with it. First, it was Vietnam/Iraq, now it's the '68 election. Next is the '69 recession and the tough economy of the '70s, if we let this go on.

Does that mean the next president will be impeached 😉 ?

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Just think how many war protestors from the sixties can be tared with the "TERRORIST" brush.

That is the whole idea behind this. That's why we're told that other guilts-by-association, like McCain with Keating and Palin with the AIP, don't matter. It's because the context behind those are not the same. The Boomers are reliving the 60s and dragging us along with it. First, it was Vietnam/Iraq, now it's the '68 election. Next is the '69 recession and the tough economy of the '70s, if we let this go on.

Does that mean the next president will be impeached 😉 ?

Nixon wasn't impeached (he resigned) and we already did that one 10 years ago.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

there are already 1,000,000 americans on the terrorist watch list so he fits right in.