Palin says: "Obama pals around with terrorists"

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Wrong, it has not been investigated. It's been looked at and dismissed by the mainstream - they've done nothing more than surface work. Sure, it gives BHO cover but is it the "truth"? We don't know what the "truth" is because it's not been investigated thoroughly enough.

If Rupert Murdoch, Lush Limbaugh, Billo and the rest of your favorite neocon liars with all of the resources at their disposal, can't find anything to substantiate your bullshit, and it means that much to you, and go out and prove it, yourself.

If you can't, repeating it doesn't make it any more true. But keep it up, clown boy. It's just more evidence of the McCain campaign's desperation, as well as your own.

John McCain's a lying, two faced POS who couldn't keep his Double Talk Express on track if it had training wheels.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Wrong, it has not been investigated. It's been looked at and dismissed by the mainstream - they've done nothing more than surface work. Sure, it gives BHO cover but is it the "truth"? We don't know what the "truth" is because it's not been investigated thoroughly enough.

If Rupert Murdoch, Lush Limbaugh, Billo and the rest of your favorite neocon liars with all of the resources at their disposal, can't find anything to substantiate your bullshit, and it means that much to you, and go out and prove it, yourself.

If you can't, repeating it doesn't make it any more true. But keep it up, clown boy. It's just more evidence of the McCain campaign's desperation, as well as your own.

John McCain's a lying, two faced POS who couldn't keep his Double Talk Express on track if it had training wheels.

Again, there are some right-wing people digging into this and they have found more - however - YOU people and the MSM dismiss it due to it's source. That's why the mainstream should do this so we can come closer to the real "truth".


lol at the duhversion to McCain. As if I care even if it was on topic.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,665
21
81
There is a lot of noise in these threads and debates. As Harvey states, it's really all BS and mud slinging. If you really think the democratic party would elect Obama with that kind of wrap on his resume or McCain for that matter, you really got to pull your head out your ass.

And the whole racial thing makes me disgusted in this nation. White people blaming blacks saying that they'll only vote for him because he's black and white people telling people to vote for McCain only because Obama is black. Why do we blame G.W. Bush for abysmal foreign relations when our own population continue to stump to new lows?

All I see right now are two puppets. McCain, who is Mr.Business and talks like a CEO. Then you have Obama, who pretends to understand what the general population (middle and working) wants.

The working class want hand outs, and the middle class want more business opportunities. That's all I see. That's why our economy is in the tubes now and for some reason people think these puppets are going bring prosperity and pride back to our great nation.

To be honest I'm still partial to whom I'm going to vote for. But in any case, I would fear for my life if McCain did get shot and Pallin got put into power.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Again, there are some right-wing people digging into this...

Of course they're digging into it. What does that prove other than that's what Rupert's paying them to do?

... and they have found more

They have? WHAT more have they found? The absence of any of the "more" you allege they've found in ANY your posts makes it evident the answer is still ZIP... NADA.

Now that you've embarrassed yourself yet again, is there any reason you shouldn't STFU about the subject until they... or you... actualy have something to say? Or is continuing to bump this thread with vapid, meaningless restatements of the same bullshit part of your need to embarrass yourself further? :laugh:

lol at the duhversion to McCain. As if I care even if it was on topic.

The McCain campaign is up to their dirty lying assholes in this particular POS lie. Your Lipstick Dipstick is pimping this lie in her stump speeches, RIGHT NOW! She says:

Our opponent is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who targeted their own country.

Who do you think writes and vets her speeches? The only attempts at any "duhversion" are from you and the rest of the right wing dogma patrol. :roll:
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: TechAZ
Originally posted by: Vic

Whereupon Palin knowingly panders to extremists like the AIP. And not years ago, but just recently.

Sorry, I weigh the candidates equally and go with the lesser of 2 evils. Obama has some negatives in my book, have no doubt of that, and I'll be watching him like a hawk, but the other guys are like a trainwreck of negatives.

Palin can disappear back to Alaska to be never seen again hopefully. She is fake, a phony, empty skirt, empty head. I sincerely hope the GOP takes a serious look in the mirror after this election.

With that said, this whole Ayers thing wouldn't be getting any traction if Obama was honest, or his army of fans would at least admit he's not some shiny rock star who has zero character judgment flaws.
Or if the Republicans weren't such bitter slime.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Again, there are some right-wing people digging into this and they have found more - however - YOU people and the MSM dismiss it due to it's source. That's why the mainstream should do this so we can come closer to the real "truth".
*sigh* Okay, I'll bite: What have these right-wing people found exactly?
 

idiotekniQues

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2007
2,572
0
76
this summed this situation up nicely, along with the first comment

http://voices.kansascity.com/node/2370

"William Ayers and Barack Obama, precocious terrorist

By George Harris, Kansas City Star Readers Advisory Panel 2008

At an age when most of us were learning to match socks, Barack Obama apparently was well on his way to consorting with terrorists.

Obama was eight years old when Weather Underground domestic terrorist William Ayers was plotting to bomb the Pentagon to stop the war in Vietnam. The precocious Obama, born in Hawaii, apparently maintained an affinity toward Ayers and, decades later in 1995, bought a house in Chicago to be near where Ayers lived. Ayers is now on the faculty in a university education department in Chicago.

Obama then cleverly inveigled himself onto two philanthropic boards with Ayers, and the two of them have used the cover of working to improve education in Chicago to conceal their conspiratorial plans. As political consultant Dick Morris pointed out in a recent article, ?After Walter Annenberg?s foundation offered several hundred million dollars to American public schools in the mid-90?s, William Ayers applied for $50 million for Chicago.?

The wealthy Annenberg Foundation was apparently too liberal to detect the potential for terrorism in the grant request, which Obama was selected to administer. Annenberg has concealed his true nature under a mask of Reagan conservatism.

Walter Annenberg is also known for his contributions to schools of communication at the University of Southern California and the University of Pennsylvania. Since Annenberg was consorting with the terrorist Ayers, clearly these schools of communication must also now be suspected.

Since their work together on ?philanthropic? activities, Ayers has been a major force in Obama?s rise to prominence, hosting a meet and greet gathering at his home for Obama and donating $200 to Obama?s campaign.

Sarah Palin charges that Obama is ?palling around with terrorists.? But the charges in this heated political campaign are flying back and forth. Obama retorts that Palin is keeping company with known deregulators. And McCain, with somewhat of a tin ear, says that Obama is consorting with known professors.

The genius displayed by Obama at such an early age is impressive. I was well into high school before I locked onto the idea that socks have a right side out, but even while in grade school, Obama was clearly planning his march to power, concealing his terrorist leanings with work on programs to aid education and help people who have lost their jobs.

Perhaps most impressive is Obama?s dogged determination and the development of his oratorical skills, which divert attention from his true mission, the destruction of the planet.

As intimated by Senator McCain in the presidential debate, Obama first had intended to destroy America?s financial markets but recently recognized that this goal had already been accomplished without much effort on his part."

the first comment:

"Roland Martin on a CNN ticker blog (10-08-08) aptly pointed out that there does seem to be a double standard in the McCain camp regarding guilt by association. Consider U.S. Senators ?working alongside people with virulent bigoted pasts like Sens. Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd?? All of whom spoke very hateful and venomous words about our countrymen. Byrd was once a member of the KKK, a domestic terrorist organization! Thurmond ran for president as a Dixiecrat in 1948 with a platform of maintaining segregation. Helms didn't see blacks as full Americans. ?So, did McCain work with them? Did he not speak with them? Should McCain have declared that he would not work alongside these men because of their past? Should the self-described maverick who believes in integrity and character have taken the honorable stance of resigning from the Senate to protest these hateful characters serving in the U.S. Senate?. . . No. And this is why this association argument is so weak and impotent."
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,559
6,707
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

Who fing cares. When did you stop fing your neighbor's wife?
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
This whole Ayers thing is absurd, it's so far-fetched. Obama is a terrorist? Puh-lease. :roll:
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

Guilt by association is McCarthyism at it's worst...
You would think that people (even Republicans) would have learned from the appalling results that came the last time this evil reared it's head.
I guess it's true that those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it...
 

Auric

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,591
2
71
Originally posted by: Tab
This whole Ayers thing is absurd, it's so far-fetched. Obama is a terrorist? Puh-lease. :roll:

Fist bumps. 'nuff said.

 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

Who fing cares. When did you stop fing your neighbor's wife?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

Why don't you answer it yourself? If you want to paint him as some kind of terrorist cohort then the burden of proof is on you.

I could ask you what your associations are with terrorists and then when you can't prove that you AREN'T involved with them claim that you are just lying and hiding the truth.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,559
6,707
126
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

Who fing cares. When did you stop fing your neighbor's wife?
What the fuck is wrong with you?

Moi?

Are you the neighbor's wife?
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Again, there are some right-wing people digging into this and they have found more - however - YOU people and the MSM dismiss it due to it's source. That's why the mainstream should do this so we can come closer to the real "truth".
*sigh* Okay, I'll bite: What have these right-wing people found exactly?

Crickets? :laugh:
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
I think that author was being facetious but these days it can be hard to tell because some people are thinking this way.
 

dbk

Lifer
Apr 23, 2004
17,685
10
81
:laugh::thumbsup: Too bad there's a lot people in this country who won't get it. :(
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Wrong, it has not been investigated. It's been looked at and dismissed by the mainstream - they've done nothing more than surface work. Sure, it gives BHO cover but is it the "truth"? We don't know what the "truth" is because it's not been investigated thoroughly enough.

If Rupert Murdoch, Lush Limbaugh, Billo and the rest of your favorite neocon liars with all of the resources at their disposal, can't find anything to substantiate your bullshit, and it means that much to you, and go out and prove it, yourself.

If you can't, repeating it doesn't make it any more true. But keep it up, clown boy. It's just more evidence of the McCain campaign's desperation, as well as your own.

John McCain's a lying, two faced POS who couldn't keep his Double Talk Express on track if it had training wheels.

Again, there are some right-wing people digging into this and they have found more - however - YOU people and the MSM dismiss it due to it's source. That's why the mainstream should do this so we can come closer to the real "truth".


lol at the duhversion to McCain. As if I care even if it was on topic.

No, we dismiss it for the same reason that we rejected Joe McCarthy...assigning guilt by association is pure and simple evil. I have to say that, all campaigning aside, I never would have figured McCain to go the McCarthy route...no matter HOW badly his campaign was going. I really thought he had more honor and integrity than what I've seen...
This is a sad campaign...
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

There isn't much information out there except for right-wing sources. Maybe if some of the "mainstream" sources would actually look into this and report on it we could come to a conclusion. But as it sits right now - it's been glossed over and neither side can claim "truth" to their claims.

They have investigated. You wouldn't know because you only watch right wing media, which to someone as far on the right as you appears unbiased.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,697
6,257
126
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Answer this question for me.

When did Obama learn that Ayers had been a terrorist. And what was his reaction.

Who fing cares. When did you stop fing your neighbor's wife?
What the fuck is wrong with you?

Moi?

Are you the neighbor's wife?

...and are you Hawt? Pics??