• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

>>> P4m 1.7 <<<

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Last Monday Intel slashed the prices on their Mobile Processors.

Mobile Processors

SAN FRANCISCO, California (Reuters) -- Intel, the world's largest computer chip maker, Monday cut prices on many of its processors used in laptops by between 10 percent and 38 percent.

The price cuts, announced on Intel's Web site on Sunday, came ahead of the company's introduction of a new higher performance mobile processor. The Centrino package of chips, chip sets and wireless networking software for laptops is expected to be released sometime before July, it has said.

Breaking down the costs
With its Pentium 4 Processor M, Intel dropped the price of its 2.20 gigahertz version by 38 percent to $348; its 2.0 GHz by 31 percent to $241; 1.90 GHz by 18 percent to $198; and 1.80 GHz by 14 percent to $171.

With the Pentium III, the 1 GHz version was dropped by 24 percent to $241 and the 933 megahertz by 18 percent to $198.

Intel also dropped prices on some of its lower-priced Celeron processors for laptops. The 1.80 GHz version was dropped by 10 percent to $134; the 1.70 GHz by 16 percent to $112; and the 1.60 GHz version by 14 percent to $96.

Will move spur sales?
The price cuts were not expected to lower the average selling prices of Intel's microprocessors as higher-margin products are rolled out, said Joseph Osha of Merrill Lynch.

It also won't necessarily spur sales, he said. "There's not much evidence that there's price elasticity of demand in this business right now."

Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, is scheduled to report its fourth-quarter results on Tuesday.


 
As expected, those are fantastic results Thugsrook, the difference the XMS3000 makes is incredible....:Q🙂
rolleye.gif
 
major update!

226fsb 452ddr CAS 2227 :Q benchmarks have been posted
(all benchmarks have been updated too)

thats right CAS 2227 2.9v on XMS3000 😉 😀

227fsb coming up next 😀 (as yes it is running!)

Sandra Mem bench @ 227fsb 454ddr CAS 2227

* big thx to the guys on Asusboards.com for some great tips 😀


<EDIT> all 2.9v benchmarks were removed
 
It's a darn good thing you type with your hands, there's no way I could talk right now with my jaw on the floor....is there a doctor in the house? :Q
 
Originally posted by: ErikaeanLogic
Originally posted by: SupermanCK
can someone send me a spare???
Click to expand...



SCK, you need to shush; you've got the stick of XMS3500 that did 233 2-2-2 on my system😛!
Click to expand...
LOL ~ hes got my stick of 512mb XMS3000 that did 450ddr on 2.6v too 😉

 
Look at those scores!!! OMG!! that's some major stuff Thugsrook, congrats...that's just incredible!!! My XMS3200 sux major butt....🙁

I just cant believe those scores...:Q😉
 
Originally posted by: THUGSROOK
sorry for the long delay in updating ~ my inet was out for over 24hours 🙁

thx Mik 😀
Click to expand...



. . .so, you're saying that you had to disable LAN to get the benchmarks to run stable???


😛



Great scores, THUGS😀!!!
 
Originally posted by: THUGSROOK
slam your cas to 222 and run 2.9v as far as you can!

i got to 250fsb 450ddr 100% M86 stable! on XMS3000!
Click to expand...

250fsb = 500DDR, no? Or did you mean 225 fsb? 250MHz fsb on 12x multi = :Q (or 3GHz)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top