Oh, and make sure that the person you are trying to convince by using an article about the battle ...wasn't at the battle 😉
I do hope you aren't serious.
with any of this. particularly the bolded. if you can't see why that is the dumbest possible option, then, well....damn.
November 8, 2004: Operation Phantom Fury begins.
- November 16, 2004: American spokesmen describe fighting in the city as mopping up isolated pockets of resistance.
😉
- December 23, 2004: Last pockets of resistance are neutralized. Three Marines are killed in the last skirmish, along with 24 insurgents.[20] Operation Phantom Fury is the bloodiest battle of the Iraq War.
If anyone should take any blame, it would be the Rambo's who supposedly killed him and didn't capture him like they were obviously ordered to do in training simulations for 10 MONTHS before this mission even happened.
LOLZ
So 8 days later there was only pockets of resistance,
and one month and half later, there was only^pockets
of resistance...😀
No. Much, much, much, much more unnecessary hassle if he were taken alive.
Where will he be detained? What conditions is he given? How many cable channels does he have access to watch? What lawyer is he getting? Where is his trial being held? Can we use evidence obtained from waterboarding in the trial? He deserves family visitation while imprisoned. And OMG the SEAL team didn't properly marandize him!!!!!!! Osama's wife was sexually discriminated during the raid...
No, it's better he is dead and over with. The longer time passes, the more the lunatics would begin sympathizing with Osama, the more parasitic lawyers would begin scheming profitable ideas from Osama.
LOL. You really are ignorant. The second battle of Fallujah was all but over in about a week, I can tell you definitively that we went from one side of town to the other in three days. The insurgents didn't "hold off" hte US military, they hide like cowards. The rest of the time was spent clearing out the remaining insurgents hiding around town, destroying weapons caches, and securing the city for the population to return.
Maybe before trying to post something that you ignorantly thinks backs your twisted view, you should read the whole thing first ...
- November 7, 2004: U.S. Marines stage just north of Fallujah. In the city, now under complete insurgent control with no American presence since April, there are a large numbers of booby traps and IEDs constructed and set in place.[16][19] Additionally, elevated sniper positions have been created along with heavily fortified defensive positions throughout the city, in preparation for a major offensive. American UAVs observed insurgents conducting live-fire exercises in the city in preparation for the coming attack.
- November 8, 2004: Operation Phantom Fury begins.
- November 16, 2004: American spokesmen describe fighting in the city as mopping up isolated pockets of resistance.
- December 23, 2004: Last pockets of resistance are neutralized. Three Marines are killed in the last skirmish, along with 24 insurgents.[20] Operation Phantom Fury is the bloodiest battle of the Iraq War.
Oh, and make sure that the person you are trying to convince by using an article about the battle ...wasn't at the battle 😉
It will be an issue when the SEAL gets put on trial for war crimes.
Obama/Panetta/etc snitched on him.
You made a good point. They might release the info he was killed unarmed if they were pissed off he wasn't taken alive for intel purposes, as they were no doubt ordered to do if possible. Otherwise, why bother to spend 10 MONTHS training to take the compound if they are just going to storm it and kill everyone in it. Why let them have 10 MONTHS to leave the compound and go somewhere else to hide?
Your comprehension of English isn't that good is it?
I wont insist on OT, but here an insight :
15000 marines with tanks bataillons and airforce heavy support
took more than ONE MONTH to defeat 3000 (at most) amateur-ish
insurgents (armed civilians) whose only weapons were machine guns,
RPGs and mortars....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_Fallujah
You actually made a good point I hadn't thought of for why they released this story like this. They might release the info he was killed unarmed if they were pissed off he wasn't taken alive for intel purposes, as they were no doubt ordered to do if possible. Otherwise, why bother to spend 10 MONTHS training to take the compound if they are just going to storm it and kill everyone in it. Why let them have 10 MONTHS to leave the compound and go somewhere else to hide?
Seriously, who left the door open at P&N's day care?
I guess you sat in on training, and mission briefs then eh hotshot? Maybe you wrote the Op Order? You know what they were "obviously" order to do? Oh, you weren't there, or involved in any way shape or form, just being an armchair command? Say it isn't so. So much fail, so little time.
. If you really do have one I weep for the education instutition you got it from.
And you can sit there as an exmilitary grunt armchair commander and honestly presume, in public, that they spent 10 MONTHS training just to dream up different ways and scenarios just to kill him? That would simply defy all logic and reason, and if you don't believe it, go look up "military intelligence" and get back to us on how that applies to you.
Where are you coming up with this "training to take the compound for 10 months"? They didn't even know who was in the compound, they suspected. Do you really think that for almost the last year, one of the most elite units in the US military was only training this one mission?
Good enough to understand that what you re quoting
is the US military declarations of the time that are in line
with the WMDs thingies propaganda...
During one month and a half, the US army kept
saying every day that only pockets of resistances
were remaining in the city...
I'm completely serious.
And I haven't faulted Obama one single time in all of my postings, either, like you seem to imply in other posts that everyone here is faulting him, they obviously all aren't. So pull your head out of your partisan ass before you post next time, ok?
If anyone should take any blame, it would be the Rambo's who supposedly killed him and didn't capture him like they were obviously ordered to do in training simulations for 10 MONTHS before this mission even happened.
One of the senators said she knew about the compound for months. They even set up a mockup of the compound to train. It wasn't a spur of the moment thing.
You actually made a good point I hadn't thought of for why they released this story like this. They might release the info he was killed unarmed if they were pissed off he wasn't taken alive for intel purposes, as they were no doubt ordered to do if possible. Otherwise, why bother to spend 10 MONTHS training to take the compound if they are just going to storm it and kill everyone in it. Why let them have 10 MONTHS to leave the compound and go somewhere else to hide?
Where are you coming up with this "training to take the compound for 10 months"? They didn't even know who was in the compound, they suspected. Do you really think that for almost the last year, one of the most elite units in the US military was only training this one mission?
I also can't fathom the notion that bin Laden is, in any way, valuable as a prisoner.
And you can sit there as an exmilitary grunt armchair commander and honestly presume, in public, that they spent 10 MONTHS training just to dream up different ways and scenarios just to kill him? That would simply defy all logic and reason, and if you don't believe it, go look up "military intelligence" and get back to us on how that applies to you.