• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Once again, a brave cop goes home tonight

Page 22 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Let's argue that it was real. That still doesn't explain why he need to be executed immediately!

That's kind of where I land on this as well. I hate the stupid angelic narrative our crap media pushes, pretending it was just a sweet little angel buying iced tea and skittles ....errrr.... playing with a toy who got mowed down. However, I don't think it's appropriate for a cop to start shooting within a second of pulling up unless the boy actually really pulled out the gun to and aimed it at them -- and I don't think that happened.

Are you really okay telling cops not to risk their personal safety at all? If so, then you can expect a lot more of this. Personally though, I would prefer to hire courageous individuals that are willing to put the safety of society before their own, and pay them accordingly for doing so.

You are NEVER going to find a million people who are willing to put the lives of a possible perp (a suspect wielding a gun) over their own. That just doesn't make sense.

It just sucks how it all turned out in this case.
 
How is "driving to the scene of a reported gunman threatening passers-by" not risking "their personal safety at all?" I didn't hear of anyone anyone else rushing to the scene. :colbert:

How does pulling right up within 10 feet of a potential threat and jumping out before the car stops not risking "their personal safety at all?"
 
So is it normal to charge people for ambulances when shot by police? That's taking the fuck barrel to whole new depths.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UjpmT5noto

So, a criminal who shoots and cops and gets shot in return shouldn't have the cost of emergency services he caused added to his charges?

Of course it's normal. That's like saying someone who rams a police cruiser isn't responsible for the damages when shot by the police.
 
So, a criminal who shoots and cops and gets shot in return shouldn't have the cost of emergency services he caused added to his charges?.

Why do you people (as in neocon teaparty yeehadists) love these strawman arguments so much?
 
So, a criminal who shoots and cops and gets shot in return shouldn't have the cost of emergency services he caused added to his charges?

Of course it's normal. That's like saying someone who rams a police cruiser isn't responsible for the damages when shot by the police.

you are way to fucking stupid.
 
So, a criminal who shoots and cops and gets shot in return shouldn't have the cost of emergency services he caused added to his charges?

Of course it's normal. That's like saying someone who rams a police cruiser isn't responsible for the damages when shot by the police.

Umm, not only did he not shoot at officers but it was a 12 year old kid that got shot within 2 freaking seconds of the officer showing up and he didn't even have a firearm. Just a tad bit of difference.
 
So is it normal to charge people for ambulances when shot by police? That's taking the fuck barrel to whole new depths.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UjpmT5noto
So, a criminal who shoots and cops and gets shot in return shouldn't have the cost of emergency services he caused added to his charges?

Of course it's normal. That's like saying someone who rams a police cruiser isn't responsible for the damages when shot by the police.
That was clearly not the standard being applied here.
So? You failed to word your question in a way that didn't have an an OBVIOUS answer, so I answered OBVIOUSLY.

Why do you people (as in neocon teaparty yeehadists) love these strawman arguments so much?
What argument are you even talking about? He asked a question. I answered it. Nothing I said had anything to do with Tamir Rice so that it would be clear he was asking the wrong question.

Not sure where you got the impression that I am a "neocon teaparty yeehadists." 🙄

you are way to fucking stupid.
...and, what? You're too smart to understand that I was not referring to Tamir Rice as a criminal in any way? Obvious question had obvious answer, genius.

Umm, not only did he not shoot at officers but it was a 12 year old kid that got shot within 2 freaking seconds of the officer showing up and he didn't even have a firearm. Just a tad bit of difference.
So? I answered HIS question.

As a refresher, here's the question again:
"So is it normal to charge people for ambulances when shot by police?"
Answer:
Yes. It is perfectly normal for people shot by the police to be billed/charged with things. Durr. Here's a really obvious and common scenario you seem to be ignoring: ...
Next time, try asking the right question so you won't look so stupid.
 
Last edited:
They settled, maybe if they pushed the courts to proceed and hadn't taken the money those people responsible would have been fired/arrested.
 
They settled, maybe if they pushed the courts to proceed and hadn't taken the money those people responsible would have been fired/arrested.

Why would the civil case have anything to do with the criminal case? They already decided not to go forward with a criminal case a while back.
 
Back
Top