rudeguy
Lifer
- Dec 27, 2001
- 47,351
- 14
- 61
From the cops' point of view, a realistic-looking gun HAS to be considered a real gun. I have no problem with that. I just think they should exercise some restraint, back off and try not shooting somebody if nobody else has been shot. Especially if it's a kid.
I'd make a lousy cop because what happened to Julie Jacks would never happen to me - I'd shoot before I let someone get control of my weapon. But even I would not shoot a kid unless I absolutely had no choice or I was in mortal danger.
Um, you might want to stay out of the countryside then. I was hunting alone well before that, as was virtually everyone I know. Wouldn't have been allowed to take a pistol or revolver though, but it's damned hard to shoot yourself with a rifle or hunting shotgun, and I was trusted to not fire on anyone else from demonstrating restraint. That's not unusual.
I love the ignorance on this forum.
I grew up with guns. I knew gun safety before I knew what a hard on was. It was nothing for a bunch of us kids to go shooting with no adults. Guns are not dangerous, they only shoot when and where you tell them to.