Man, just give it a rest. Ampere launched 2 months ago. TWO MONTHS.
What I'm showing is plaintively obvious to people who aren't brainwashed with brand loyalty, and for the 3rd time I think Ampere was largely a paper launch too. Zen 3 was simply worse.
And I'm really not stating it for the brainwashed AMD brand loyalists, though I knew they would have something meaningless to say about it.
Now, I guess shady will have to tell us why wafers required for the sameZen3 7nm node, also for Zen2 and RDNA2 on PS5, XSX, and XSXS don't count as "OEM" supply.
Even then, NvIdia still can't keep up with the supply that AMD has so far managed.
Mindfactory in Germany has sold 2.600 Ryzen 5600x already and they don't take preorders. More than the 1.000 10600k they sold since launch ;-). For comparison: they sold ~100.000 Ryzen 3600 so far. The numbers are not bad, the demany is just very high.
Prebuilds also seem to be available:
https://www.csl-computer.com/aufruest-pc-948-amd-ryzen-9-5900x.html 899€ (GPU excluded).

You should really say it's a tissue launch if you think Ampere was a paper one.That's garbage. 98% of the market has zero visibility to Zen 3. That's paper to start with. The remaining 2% DIY can't get it either. More paper. The AMD mob wants to give them a pass but that's ridiculous.
I can go to Dell's site right now and order an Alienware with either RTX 3080 or 3090 and it will deliver by or before Dec 8th. There are many other OEMs that had 30xx systems available, some sold out some have not.
Edit: I think Ampere was mostly paper too, but way better availability than Zen 3 - see next comment.
If you think Ampere was paper and Zen 3 was not, I think you need to check your bias.




Well, AMD technically started it with Zen 1 which already had a big L3 cache as well (before it was doubled as... erm... GameCache on Zen 2). It also infected their GPU products, RDNA1 already had big caches, and RDNA2 adds 128MB LLC on top of that. I guess it's only transitioning to a cache war if the competitors actually pick up on these changes?It seems to me we are transitioning from core count war to cache war.
Looks like AMD took the right lessons from the Zen 2 boost ("but it never reaches that?"), OC (the complete lack of headroom for it) and PBO ("useless and even counter-productive") debacle. Now the boost clock advertised for both Zen 2 and RDNA2 is actually consequently the guaranteed lower end of the boost range. Perfectly fine by me!I know this can't be the case (since most people don't care about OCing) but I can't help but wonder if AMD is sandbagging the PBO clocks so that us enthusiasts can still feel like we're doing something... It seems too good to be true, especially after Zen 2. Those things were binned tight.
Now Zen 3 AND RDNA2 both are capable of healthy OCs? I def upgraded too early!
AMD financial estimates for Q4 are "only" 50% higher than last year Q4. One would achieve this through a paper launch of their largest revenue source (desktop processors)... 🙄
54 owners! you've proven how amazing Ampere stock is!
Mindfactory in Germany has sold 2.600 Ryzen 5600x already and they don't take preorders.
OCing Zen3 makes no sense if you are going to game. For multithreaded productivity tasks, sure it will make a difference , but for everything else there is no point. The best route is to get a good set (4x) of memory sticks and push them to 3600-3800 with tight timings. Zen3 is a monster core and demands a great memory to tap into the potential.
I could have walked into MicroCenter 3 separate days this week and gotten my pick of 10-20 Zen3 CPUs (stock trickled down over 4 hours after opening on all 3 days). They haven't had Ampere in stock for a long time, even though I've refreshed a lot.What I'm showing is plaintively obvious to people who aren't brainwashed with brand loyalty, and for the 3rd time I think Ampere was largely a paper launch too. Zen 3 was simply worse.
And I'm really not stating it for the brainwashed AMD brand loyalists, though I knew they would have something meaningless to say about it.
The board requires an active CPU to perform the update, and so now I am confused. I have a 470 Taichi (470s are not yet listed), with a 2700X. ...does that mean I need minimum Zen2 installed to perform the update, or that I can still do it with the 2700X, but I then won't be able to operate it until I replace it with Ryzen 5000 chip?
Huh, so ASRock has already released Beta BIOS for their B450 boards to make them Zen3 compatible (AT front page--but they also seem to have removed several of the firmware updates from their website).
This is...far ahead of schedule. Disappointing, however, is the note that the upgrade will then make Ryzen 2000 and Ryzen 1000 series incompatible. Zen2 is still OK, however.
The board requires an active CPU to perform the update, and so now I am confused. I have a 470 Taichi (470s are not yet listed), with a 2700X. ...does that mean I need minimum Zen2 installed to perform the update, or that I can still do it with the 2700X, but I then won't be able to operate it until I replace it with Ryzen 5000 chip?
![]()
OK this MB has a 16MB bios, how it this possible? if i say what im thinking right now half of the forum is going to insult me, so i want to know how this is even possible? O already knew something was off because the Asus A320M-K never dropped Bristol Ridge support and it supports from a A6-9500 to a R9-3950X on a 16MB bios.