NikolaeVarius
Lifer
- Oct 25, 2006
- 11,036
- 11
- 91
News flash guy nik hates bf3 and snipers!!!
Bagging maps hes never even seen yet as uninteresting. Already decided he hates them
Tapatalking on my pos thunderbolt. Sry for teh typos!
Because there aren't numerous youtube videos, overhead maps, on ground pictures to compare to, which I've posted, and have a long argument as to my position. And you know what, no one has any answers to them, because the points are simply true.
There is a marked decrease in complexity and variability of gameplay and map design. When was the last time you heard anything about BF3 that wasn't "My KDA was high". It isn't "I prevented the enemy commander from doing anything at all", "Stole a Jet from the enemy base and bombed their uncap" or anything that resembles stories.
Also combined with the fact that the current maps mostly suck except for about 3 which are somewhat playable. 2 of those maps are in back to Karkand, which are only because they copied a large portion of the map, and STILL managed to dumb it down. Compare the across the rover portion of the map in BF2 and BF3. BF3 has nothing there compered to BF2.
You can't even destroy the bridge, which was a huge part of that map. The current map designers can't make a good map unless its a carbon copy of previous classics.
Last edited: