• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

O'Donnell In 1999: 'I Dabbled Into Witchcraft' (VIDEO)

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
SP33Demon said:
Nice retort from a mental midget. I bet it took you 16 years to get an English degree as well. You sure have cast your spell of idiocy on us all, and it didn't even take snake blood or a mouse tail.
Click to expand...
It may have taken her 16 years...but at least she has a degree. Perhaps you should consider redirecting your faux outrage elsewhere Dr. Einstein.

5 percent in Congress lack college degree
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/49955http://thechoice.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/congress/
 
HomerJS said:
Like accusing Michelle Obama of saying "whitey"?
Like repeating Hussein over and over until 30% the slopeheads in West Va think he is an "A-rab"
Click to expand...
Obama has a Harvard degree? Elitist!
Obama went to a madrassa? Muslim!
Obama pal'ed around with Bill Ayers? Terrorist!
Obama went to a church headed by Rev. Wright? Racist!
Obama wants to raise taxes and give it to the poor? Redistributor!
Obama was born in Kenya? Ineligible!
etc.
 
Last edited:
SP33Demon said:
Spoken like a true GED candidate. I get it, you guys never went to college. Shame on us scrutinizing a possible Senator for taking 16 years to finish their English degree, not working a real job, won't disclose where they got money to pay bills since they don't work, and having a horrible financial history despite touting fiscal conservatism in the Tea Party. They are going to help fix the economy... /roll
Click to expand...

Shame on you for saying "WE" when you cant vote in the DE election.
 
Doc Savage Fan said:
It may have taken her 16 years...but at least she has a degree. Perhaps you should consider redirecting your faux outrage elsewhere Dr. Einstein.

5 percent in Congress lack college degree
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/49955http://thechoice.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/24/congress/
Click to expand...

That is sad but luckily it's not large percentage. Also, only 1 senator doesn't have a degree: Begich from Alaska. But at least he has a respectable past: the Assembly for 10 years and mayor for 5.

I'd be curious to see how many of those 5% actually had a job, supported themselves with said job, and aren't being investigated by the IRS for tax evasion... Probably most.
 
SP33Demon said:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/18/odonnell-witchcraft-politically-incorrect_n_722035.html

That video is great... just another nutcase Republican Tea Party candidate running for Senate. I guess many of her dates go like this which is why she's still single at 41.
Click to expand...

I dont see the big deal here, she made the comment 11 years ago. So she was 30 then and she was talking in the past tense at that time. So she may have been 18 when she dabbled in Witchcraft. Big deal, alot of teens and early 20s people do that and still do, they are called Freaks down here. I never messed with it since it is stupid, but the people I know who did it did it for the social aspect of it and never did believe in magic or anything like that. They are similar to Goths really, and they grow out of it at around 30 and the people I know who did that stuff now have families, and good jobs. So its a fad.

On the other hand she could have acted like a poor imitation of K-Fed and ended up as a loser. I cant count how many white people I know who are 30ish and are losers today, still trying to imitate the long dead Tupac.
 
TL;DR, but without watching the video replay, does this mean that she just locked up the traditionally Democrat leaning Druidic, Wiccan, Dianic and natural pantheist voters?

She is just short of $2 million in Internet donations! Is she passing around the collection basket, or what?
 
peonyu said:
I dont see the big deal here, she made the comment 11 years ago. So she was 30 then and she was talking in the past tense at that time. So she may have been 18 when she dabbled in Witchcraft. Big deal, alot of teens and early 20s people do that and still do, they are called Freaks down here. I never messed with it since it is stupid, but the people I know who did it did it for the social aspect of it and never did believe in magic or anything like that. They are similar to Goths really, and they grow out of it at around 30 and the people I know who did that stuff now have families, and good jobs. So its a fad.

On the other hand she could have acted like a poor imitation of K-Fed and ended up as a loser. I cant count how many white people I know who are 30ish and are losers today, still trying to imitate the long dead Tupac.
Click to expand...

If this were anybody but a Republican, people would be crying about how he's a devil worshiping terrorists bent on transforming this country into the same. Hell, they do it now with these "muslim" claims.
 
I would not hire her to answer phones let alone vote for her to represent a state. Im a small business owner so you know im right...
 
so sad that in this day and age a complete moron like this is national news

well done GOP - your top 2 newsmakers right now are Palin and this moron that - wait - maybe that's the approach - actually makes Palin look better...

wow
 
I know that Delaware is a small state, but is its best contest for Senator really a former dabbler in witchcraft (and apparently not much else since) and a former Marxist?

Ain't it odd that in a year when Republicans have honest chances in places they couldn't have touched five years ago, their candidates generally seem to be so poor? Still better than the Dems probably, but definitely underwhelming.
 
werepossum said:
I know that Delaware is a small state, but is its best contest for Senator really a former dabbler in witchcraft (and apparently not much else since) and a former Marxist?

Ain't it odd that in a year when Republicans have honest chances in places they couldn't have touched five years ago, their candidates generally seem to be so poor? Still better than the Dems probably, but definitely underwhelming.
Click to expand...

This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that this woman took a seat away from a moderate with great ideas and a track record worthy of a cabinet post....

Mike Castle would have gotten my vote for president over Bush, Mcain, Dole, or any other republican in the last 20 years...
 
manimal said:
This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that this woman took a seat away from a moderate with great ideas and a track record worthy of a cabinet post....

Mike Castle would have gotten my vote for president over Bush, Mcain, Dole, or any other republican in the last 20 years...
Click to expand...

Nah, better to purge the moderates now while we have the chance. Look at all the crap he voted for with the Democrats: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/c000243/key-votes/

Castle voted against the Iraq surge, against oil drilling, socialized prescription drugs, for the ridiculous unemployment extensions, etc etc.
 
manimal said:
This problem is further exacerbated by the fact that this woman took a seat away from a moderate with great ideas and a track record worthy of a cabinet post....

Mike Castle would have gotten my vote for president over Bush, Mcain, Dole, or any other republican in the last 20 years...
Click to expand...

Instead you voted for Obumer right? Castle has voted for Tarp, Stimulus, Obamacare, ect.. Why is he a republican??? And what are his "great ideas"?

It's funny that people are going crazy of O"Donnell about intelligence, but look at who used to hold that seat, Biden may be the biggest idiot in politics.
 
zsdersw said:
Purge the moderates only if you enjoy minority status.
Click to expand...

What difference does it make whether we have a majority of moderates or a minority of conservatives, either way liberal policy is made and the people lose.

At least the latter option lends to the future possibility of a majority of conservatives.
 
QuantumPion said:
What difference does it make whether we have a majority of moderates or a minority of conservatives, either way liberal policy is made and the people lose.

At least the latter option lends to the future possibility of a majority of conservatives.
Click to expand...

I don't mean within the party.

the future possibility of a majority
Click to expand...

The delusion on which every election is waged.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top