It says on the bottom right who made the chart.
Attack the source. Another standard when you have nothing.
It says on the bottom right who made the chart.
Attack the source. Another standard when you have nothing.
Then get drawing. Either way, this current flowchart shows what a fucking mess the gov't makes of anything it touches.
I would have preferred a simpler bill as well, how about a one sentence one:
"The age of eligibility for Medicare is hereby lowered to birth."
It says on the bottom right who made the chart.
Prepared by: Joint Economic Committee, Republican Staff
Congressman Kevin Brady, Senior House Republican
Senator Sam Brownback, Ranking Member
that'd be awesome if medicare weren't just another giant fustercluck.
if all private payments were outlawed tomorrow and medicare/aid/schip/VA not expanded at all, we'd still be spending as much per capita (not per covered person) as germany/france/UK and covering just a fraction.
Complex things are complex. For example:
![]()
This is complex too, ergo it must be bad.
Prove it.
Complex things are complex. For example:
![]()
This is complex too, ergo it must be bad.
Complex things are complex. For example:
![]()
This is complex too, ergo it must be bad.
So a bill that essentially reduces nothing, adds much more coverage, and adds much much more administrative overhead... Premiums go up at higher rates for many people.
The only problem with the health care bill is that it doesn't contain single payer non profit government insurance because the Republicans blocked it. It could have all been very simple.
But Republicans and the brain dead morons who vote them in are assholes who support the interests of the insurance industry over the American people.
I like how patients and physicians are little insignificant afterthoughts stuck in the corner of the graph.
It's pretty simple conceptually. Obamacare does little to nothing to reduce costs, it's main goal is to cover everyone and shuffle costs around to land on those who Democrats feel have higher capacity to pay.
So a bill that essentially reduces nothing, adds much more coverage, and adds much much more administrative overhead... Premiums go up at higher rates for many people.
Like when the President goes around selling his mess, all proud that children are covered on their parents' plan until 26, that is not "free" medical coverage, it is not "cheaper" medical coverage, it is simply coverage paid for by someone else.
This is absolute truth because the Democrats don't have a majority in Congress and our president is Republican. This is proof that we need more Democrats NAO!
Complex things are complex. For example:
![]()
This is complex too, ergo it must be bad.
You don't think the source has an agenda? If you believe that, I have some competent Republicans for you to vote for![]()
Than prove the agenda wrong. If you're right it should be easy to prove without ad hom attacks.
Agenda is an agenda. Time will tell who's right or wrong, maybe. We know that doing nothing as Republicans have done was wrong, premiums far outpaced inflation and number of uninsured soared.
When you got nothing to offer, it's easier to just sling mud at other people's solutions.
Obamacare isn't the optimal solution but it will save money compared to the status quo(doing nothing), that is a fact that some refuse to acknowledge no matter what evidence is put forth.
Companies that provide a quality health care package are gettign hit with penalties of 25-50%.Prove it. Premiums and health care costs rose enormously even without this bill while Republicans did nothing.