• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama impeachment a possibility, says Ron Paul

Texashiker said:
Could be lucky enough to see obama impeached?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65035.html

My personal opinion, obama is a murderer. By signing the death order, obama acted as judge, jury and executioner.
Click to expand...

Zero chance. Not only is the killing widely supported by most people in government, but it's Ron Paul for christ's sake. If he is trying to do something you generally don't have to look further into it. You can just assume it will be a failure and move on.

Yes, this act was absolutely abominable in my opinion. No, nothing will come of it.
 
He's summoning the bots, again.

Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul...

It's a chant, really, a mantra of denial...
 
eskimospy said:
Zero chance. Not only is the killing widely supported by most people in government,
Click to expand...

Anyone who applauds the murder of a US citizen without a trial, and no attempt to arrest, has not place serving in public office.

I see the US government becoming like nazi germany. The government tells the citizens we need to kill a certain group of people, and we blindly accept what the government tells us.

Non-US citizens are being kept prisoner without a trial, and US citizens are being hunted down and killed.

How much is enough?
 
Texashiker said:
Anyone who applauds the murder of a US citizen without a trial, and no attempt to arrest, has not place serving in public office.

I see the US government becoming like nazi germany. The government tells the citizens we need to kill a certain group of people, and we blindly accept what the government tells us.

Non-US citizens are being kept prisoner without a trial, and US citizens are being hunted down and killed.

How much is enough?
Click to expand...

How many things has Ron Paul said were impeachable offenses during his time in Congress? How many was he right on?

I think this decision was awful as I've already said, but lets not get carried away with the Nazi references. The US and Nazi Germany are nothing alike.
 
Just like every other ridiculous statement Ron Paul has made over the years this will result in nothing but hot air from the "abolish the fed" fringe.
 
Looks like the right is jealous of Obama's terrorist killing spree.

I though you guys said he was in support of all his Muslim brothers; yet, when he bombs Lybia, kills Osama and this scum bag - you want him impeached.

Wassamatta; were you hoping an old white man was going to kill off and shoo away America's enemies? Angry that the retarded donkey shit for brains idiots before Obama pissed away trillions and couldn't get Osama?
 
An impeachment trial would be the best thing for Obama. I would think a majority if not by a large amount supported taking al-Alaki out.
 
Macamus Prime said:
Looks like the right is jealous of Obama's terrorist killing spree.

I though you guys said he was in support of all his Muslim brothers; yet, when he bombs Lybia, kills Osama and this scum bag - you want him impeached.

Wassamatta; were you hoping an old white man was going to kill off and shoo away America's enemies? Angry that the retarded donkey shit for brains idiots before Obama pissed away trillions and couldn't get Osama?
Click to expand...

As diabolical Communist Kenyan Muslim Manchurian candidate plants bent on the destruction of the US go, he's proven to be awfully good at killing Muslims. It never ceases to impress/make me sad how Republicans keep trying to go after the guy for being weak or whatever when he's turned out to be one of the coldest blooded killers of people I've ever seen. Bush and Cheney were pussies next to this guy.

(note: I don't think that's a good thing, but lots of people apparently do, hence my confusion)
 
Macamus Prime said:
Looks like the right is jealous of Obama's terrorist killing spree.

when he bombs Lybia, kills Osama and this scum bag - you want him impeached.
Click to expand...

Who gets to determine who is terrorist?

Does the president have the authority to say "that person is a terrorist, and should be put to death"? If so, are there any limits to that authority?

Would the #occupywallstreet protestors be considered terrorist? What about Glen Beck, and Anderson Cooper? Could they be considered terrorist?

What about the IRS, could they be considered terrorist?
 
Didn't he declare war and call for attacks on the US? He was a sworn enemy of the US...good riddance to him....
 
eskimospy said:
Zero chance. Not only is the killing widely supported by most people in government, but it's Ron Paul for christ's sake. If he is trying to do something you generally don't have to look further into it. You can just assume it will be a failure and move on.

Yes, this act was absolutely abominable in my opinion. No, nothing will come of it.
Click to expand...

While I agree that nothing will come out of it, popularity has nothing to do with legality.
 
eskimospy said:
As diabolical Communist Kenyan Muslim Manchurian candidate plants bent on the destruction of the US go, he's proven to be awfully good at killing Muslims. It never ceases to impress/make me sad how Republicans keep trying to go after the guy for being weak or whatever when he's turned out to be one of the coldest blooded killers of people I've ever seen. Bush and Cheney were pussies next to this guy.

(note: I don't think that's a good thing, but lots of people apparently do, hence my confusion)
Click to expand...
Seriously? Bush and Cheney removed an entire country from the control of an Islamic fundamentalist group directly and materially supporting a terrorist group which had just killed thousands of Americans and they are pussies compared to Obama?

I too think Obama has done an excellent job fighting the terrorists. I just don't have my liberal blinders on when I see anyone not sharing my world vision.
 
her209 said:
An impeachment trial would be the best thing for Obama. I would think a majority if not by a large amount supported taking al-Alaki out.
Click to expand...

What the majority thinks is rather irrelevant in a court of law. If the majority think that you should be shot for making that post it wouldn't make it legal.

But, as I said in my previous post, nothing will come of this.
 
GoPackGo said:
Didn't he declare war and call for attacks on the US? He was a sworn enemy of the US...good riddance to him....
Click to expand...

Thomas Jefferson said,

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Click to expand...

The citizens are entitled to revolt against the federal government, the founding fathers knew this.

The 2nd amendment was put in place so that an armed populace could revolt against a corrupt government.
 
werepossum said:
Seriously? Bush and Cheney removed an entire country from the control of an Islamic fundamentalist group directly and materially supporting a terrorist group which had just killed thousands of Americans and they are pussies compared to Obama?

I too think Obama has done an excellent job fighting the terrorists. I just don't have my liberal blinders on when I see anyone not sharing my world vision.
Click to expand...

Yeah Bush also started a war in Iraq, which Obama opposed, that resulted in the death of how many Iraqis? Normally Eskimospy's posts are more level headed than that.
 
Texashiker said:
Anyone who applauds the murder of a US citizen without a trial, and no attempt to arrest, has not place serving in public office.

I see the US government becoming like nazi germany. The government tells the citizens we need to kill a certain group of people, and we blindly accept what the government tells us.

Non-US citizens are being kept prisoner without a trial, and US citizens are being hunted down and killed.

How much is enough?
Click to expand...
Really?

So Lincoln should have been arrested during the civil war?

Instead of being on a monument he should be remembered as a criminal?

I think most of the sane people on the left and right agree with the idea of kill terrorists whether they are American or not.
 
Darwin333 said:
What the majority thinks is rather irrelevant in a court of law. If the majority think that you should be shot for making that post it wouldn't make it legal.

But, as I said in my previous post, nothing will come of this.
Click to expand...
Definitely has to do with opinion. The Senate isn't impartial after all.
 
Texashiker said:
Who gets to determine who is terrorist?
Click to expand...
On ground/on battlefield intelligence and cooperative nations/people.

Texashiker said:
Does the president have the authority to say "that person is a terrorist, and should be put to death"?
Click to expand...
With proper proof, yes. Just as an insurgent is to be shot by an American soldier who is spraying bullets at a US military convoy.

Texashiker said:
If so, are there any limits to that authority?
Click to expand...
There is a considerable amount of levels and layers between what intelligence finds, reviewed and passed onto the President for a decision. The very "big gubnament" some of you enjoy protesting is what provides limits to that authority.

Texashiker said:
Would the #occupywallstreet protestors be considered terrorist?
Click to expand...
If they physically attack people who walk by them, they are criminals and should be arrested. If they continue to attack people in the Wall Street area after being put away, then yes - they will be considered terrorists.

Texashiker said:
What about Glen Beck, and Anderson Cooper? Could they be considered terrorist?
Click to expand...
They have a message - which people have the right to disagree with, just as much as they have the right to deliver it. If their message is to bring physical harm to those who oppose their message, then they are terrorists.

Texashiker said:
What about the IRS, could they be considered terrorist?
Click to expand...
We live in a nation where the tax laws are known. It is your requirement, as a citizen, to follow the laws and rules. You don't like them? Fine. Go ahead and change the system. Or, go someplace where they allow you do whatever you want.

The same concept (follow the laws and rules) applies to EVERYONE. Not just the illegal immigrants greedy business men hire. Go to the fucking source, don't shoo away the symptoms.
 
ProfJohn said:
Really?

So Lincoln should have been arrested during the civil war?

Instead of being on a monument he should be remembered as a criminal?
Click to expand...

I do not understand your comment? Was Lincoln the one who took up arms against the US?

Keep in mind, Lincoln pardoned just about everyone who took up arms against the US.

The north captured and held southerners in POW camps, those people were not put to death.

In fact, both sides took prisoners. Andersonville for example. After the war, the commander of Andersonville was court-marshaled for the way POWs were treated.
 
ProfJohn said:
I think most of the sane people on the left and right agree with the idea of kill terrorists whether they are American or not.
Click to expand...

All fine and peachy so long as you agree on what 'terrorist' is. You won't be smiling when you're it and they've removed all due process to anyone with a label.
 
ProfJohn said:
I think most of the sane people on the left and right agree with the idea of kill terrorists whether they are American or not.
Click to expand...

And most people in nazi germany were probably fine with lining jews up.

And most people in the 1700s and 1800s were fine with owning blacks as slaves.

Segmenting a group of people, and saying its "ok" to kill that group, is wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top