- Aug 20, 2004
- 5,483
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: phaxmohdem
Yikes, that thing would cook!
On another note, the article mentioned the 8000 series GEForces, and their SM 4.0 support. Will DX10 finally be around and supported in this GPU? Seems like we've been stuck at DX9 longer than previous versions.
The info on G80 or 8000 series is pure BS. It was just tacked on these comments.Originally posted by: phaxmohdem
On another note, the article mentioned the 8000 series GEForces, and their SM 4.0 support. Will DX10 finally be around and supported in this GPU? Seems like we've been stuck at DX9 longer than previous versions.
Originally posted by: phaxmohdem
Yikes, that thing would cook!
750Mhz would be unbelievable imo.
People also indicated you couldn't make a DX9 card on 130nm.Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: phaxmohdem
Yikes, that thing would cook!
On another note, the article mentioned the 8000 series GEForces, and their SM 4.0 support. Will DX10 finally be around and supported in this GPU? Seems like we've been stuck at DX9 longer than previous versions.
I would imagine it has to have some compatibility with Vista supposed to be out late 06.
It would be foolish for Nvidia to not have at least one product in the channel that is DX10 compatible.
750Mhz would be unbelievable imo.
which components are those?As reported on November 7, an upstream component shortage has led to tight supplies of ATI?s GPUs including the Radeon 9250, X300, X550 and its recently launched Radeon X1000 family.
Originally posted by: crazydingo
The info on G80 or 8000 series is pure BS. It was just tacked on these comments.Originally posted by: phaxmohdem
On another note, the article mentioned the 8000 series GEForces, and their SM 4.0 support. Will DX10 finally be around and supported in this GPU? Seems like we've been stuck at DX9 longer than previous versions.
Common sense.Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
How do you know this?Originally posted by: crazydingo
The info on G80 or 8000 series is pure BS. It was just tacked on these comments.
Originally posted by: crazydingo
Common sense.Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
How do you know this?Originally posted by: crazydingo
The info on G80 or 8000 series is pure BS. It was just tacked on these comments.
All this information/speculation is based on the comments of Marv Burkett and Michael Hara's comments at the latest conference. They do not mention G80 or SM4.
The G80+SM4 part was tacked on just to make it more sensational.![]()
Well since common sense is not applicable to all, I should have tacked an IMHO in there just in case.Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Common Sense? Then perhaps "IMHO" should have been tacked onto your statement because it would seem you came to your own conclusion. But you really don't need to now as that is understood.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Well it's great that these new cards are coming out at such a rapid pace but where are the good games?!? You can give me a super computer to use but if the games suck, who cares? Right now I find just keeping track of this hardware and discussing it to be much more "fun" than actually utilizing the hardware for gaming...sigh.
Originally posted by: Cooler
when is this card coming out 2H 06?
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Well it's great that these new cards are coming out at such a rapid pace but where are the good games?!? You can give me a super computer to use but if the games suck, who cares? Right now I find just keeping track of this hardware and discussing it to be much more "fun" than actually utilizing the hardware for gaming...sigh.
Current engines still have a lot of life in them, its up to developers to increase detail and geometry counts and texture sizes to challenge the new hardware.