Zap
Elite Member
- Oct 13, 1999
- 22,377
- 2
- 81
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Its not the inquirer who should be questioned here. But people who dismiss these reports as nothing and say all is well . Its these people who concern me.
So, NVIDIA is guilty until proven innocent?
Originally posted by: apoppin
- and we DO see this reported; it does not come close to the disaster Charlie makes it to be - without substantial fact to back up anything. He *exaggerates* the issues .. that is beyond clear and he writes his own opinion as though it was factual.
I have noticed that Charlie will say stuff and then go "as shown HERE and HERE." Click on those links and you'll see... articles written by Charlie. He is quoting himself as "proof." :roll:
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
In God I trust . In man I have little left for other than contempt.
You trust Charlie... therefore Charlie must be God?!?!?!?!??!@?111!!! :Q
Journalists and Asian moles aren't the only ones spreading these rumors, by the way. Neil McLellan, AMD's director of packaging and interconnect technologies
Ahhh, so we find an unbiased opinion in the form of someone from one of NVIDIA's direct competitors...
Here's how I see it:
Charlie's truth <------------------------------------- the real truth ---------------------------------------> NVIDIA's truth
(dashes not to scale)
Those who say there is absolutely no problem... are lying to themselves. NVIDIA has stated that there may be a problem, and has set aside funds to deal with the problem.
Those who say there is absolutely and 100% a problem... are lying to themselves. It is no secret that Charlie hates NVIDIA with a passion.
The real truth is somewhere between these two extremes. Where is it? I don't know.
Neither does Charlie.