So people that said Nvidia was going to be late, delayed can say AMD is to ? 🙂
If by people you mean Nvidia themselves...
That article is a rambling mess. Not sure why capacity problems with 40nm stuff would be impacting 28nm so much, if anything I would think that would get them to want to move to 28nm more.
The HD 6000 series is not selling as well as AMD would like us to believe. This has resulted in low store stocks
Er, isn't that kinda contradictory?
No rush to move to 7000 series? If its mostly going to be based on VLIW4 why wouldn't AMD be in a rush to get it out? Really even if it was GCN mostly I would think they'd still want it out so that companies could have actual hardware to work with.
No, I'm not saying its not delayed, as I think most people expected it to be anyway because of TSMCs problems (and GF seems to be having issues of their own as well), but this article is shotgunning a bunch of things and some of it seems just outright contradictory.
Kinda curious how much this has to do with the recent Apple deal?
Looks like a good 18 months of bad times to be interested in updgrades in computing. Last year 28nm wasn't ready. Then if you waited for Sandy Bridge, and either bought it and got burned by the chipset recall, or then decided to wait for Bulldozer (which still isn't here). Now 28nm not ready again. SB-E is gimped a bit, and you won't have new video cards to go with it, so some probably might hold off to Ivy Bridge. Which by the time that gets here we'll be knee deep in IB-E talk, maybe DDR4 as well. Who knows, by then AMD might have even put out a good Bulldozer based CPU?