I think this applies to the broader topic of human psychology. There's a large segment of the population who is saying "well, they're not
mandating it, therefore it's not
that serious...therefore I don't need to wear one." Now all of these states who were late to the game are getting hammered with rising numbers. CNN headline news, right now, is saying we just broke
another coronavirus record nationwide:
The nation's top infectious disease expert on Friday urged governors and mayors to "be as forceful as possible" to get people to wear face coverings.
www.cnn.com
Clear leadership comes from the top, and the government currently has a credibility problem because they've played with the numbers so much over the last few months that nobody trusts anything the government says about the virus by now. Taking the approach of not mandating masks, but saying "we encourage you to wear them", all while we're climbing in infection & deathrates nationwide, tells a certain segment of the population that it's not as serious as it is, and therefore we get lax results. I think a better approach would be:
1. Make masks state-mandated
2. Tell people the truth: the government doesn't know all of the details yet, but this is serious, and we'd rather err on the side of caution, given how low-impact wearing a mask in public is
3. Provide free masks so that it's a non-issue. Deliver disposable ones to the local police HQ, grocery stores, etc. Make it easy, convenient, and zero-cost to be compliant.
4. Reassure people that they're not going to get ticketed for not wearing a mask or not social distancing, but it's a
mandate based on the best information we know
so far. People need a reason to buy into things, even if the reason isn't perfect.
My state borders NYC & we've had a fairly low death count relative to them; while correlation is not causation, everyone here started wearing masks & social distancing back in April because it was legally mandated. The governor was very clear about both of those topics:
It's absolutely unenforceable, but that's not the point - the point is that there is a large segment of the population who buys into whatever is said without looking deeper, so if the governor comes out & says nah, it's not mandated, then
even if he says he recommends that people wear them, that segment of the population isn't going to take it very seriously. Then you end up with headlines like this:
On Wednesday, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp quashed all local orders that require masks as the state saw its second-highest count of new cases of COVID-19.
www.wbur.org
Again - it's not
everyone, but there is a segment of people who buy into the face value of government orders, news headlines, etc. & draws their own conclusions based on that alone. Georgia just had their second-highest count of new cases of COVID-19, and the public order is to remove the mask mandate. Yes, this seems like mixed messaging to me. Yes, I do think this leads to disputes down the road between what is legal state-wide & what is required within a particular company. Not every situation, not every time, but legal orders & conflicting information do have an impact on the behavior of the population.