Netanyahu: No war crimes trials for Israelis

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

That will never happen!!
We need them as an allie more than they need our assistance!
Nobody else in that part of the world will assist us with intelligence gathering like the Israeli`s!
Also the israeli`s did not ask for us to start supporting them with military aid.
We took it upon ourselves to do so.
They were just fine without any assistance from us.

While I fully admit they are our greatest ally there, they are also our net largest enemy. Their Pro's for us a nation do not outweigh the Con's, and even worse, they do not go to any length to act honorably in treating the Palestinians - in an overall manner.

They don't deserve our support, and we don't deserve to further tarnish our name by being tied to their actions.

I'm not saying turn against them, I'm simply saying, allow no aid to come from US to them, and not to get involved - either way - in their affairs. If they want to go slaughter the Millions of Palestinians, the rest of the world who loves to b1tch about American arrogance can go bail them out. If Israel wants to build until it's Israeli McMansion's all over Palestinian areas, let them feel the distain of the UN without our safety veto vote - that we then end up taking the hit on for protecting them.

Israel as a nation that thinks of itself as pure and good needs to start being pure and good...for being people of god, they don't act that way.

Chuck
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
So jedi your Jew . May I ask . What part of the world was your family orginally befor Israel was restored. Or were was it your forfathers settled from .

My family came out of Poland , Germany and what was then called Czechoslovakia!
Ya I should have told you were ya were from. Befor I asked I knew the ans . befor I asked.

So your the same kind of jew as Rothschild . Is that correct or not . I say it is. KAZAR jew.

The greatest conspirecy in the world planned out 1000s of years ago . Everthing in the world today thats occurring is from the Kazar jew . -- That is total garbage@@!!!
Ya your from the line of abraham alright . question is which one of the 2 sons

actually you don`t know what you are talking about...
I have heard this tested garbage before....smacks of racism.....
So your one of those Khazar fruitcakes huih?? that explains a lot....

It matters not what you say or don`t say!!

So what are we to make of the Khazar myth concerning Ashkenazi Jews and their supposed lack of legitimate claims to Israel due to their Khazar origins? The greatest irony is that even if the entire Khazar theory of Ashkenazi Jews were correct - and virtually none of it is correct - it would be entirely irrelevant. Judaism has never defined Jews on racial grounds. Anyone from any race is welcome as a convert to Judaism as long as he or mshe is sincere.

My Jewish lineage goes back well over 1,000 years from what I can tell. We lived in Europe well before the Kazar kingdom was formed.
********************************************************
The actual details of the Khazar theory concerning European Jewry are simply pseudo-history and crackpot poppycock.

Jews already lived in Europe a thousand years before the Khazar kingdom was formed. There are no genetic markers or indicators at all showing that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Turkic tribes. In fact, there exists considerable genetic evidence showing that European Jews are closer to Levantine and Syrian Arabs than to Central Asians.

After the Mongol invasion most Khazars probably assimilated into the Jewish communities of Iran and Iraq, which of course eventually emerged as important Sephardic centers, formed mainly of Jews with Semitic racial characteristics, descended from migrants and exiled Jews from the Land of Israel. In any case, there are more "Semitic" Sephardic Jews in Israel today than there are European Ashkenazi Jews. And if the Khazars looked Turkic, how on earth could they give Ashkenazi Jews a European complexion?

There are other problems. If all Ashkenazi Jews are descended from converted Khazars, why are there Cohens and Levis among them? One inherits the status of a Cohen (priest) or Levite from one's father. Descendants of converts through the male line can never be a Cohen or a Levite.

And why are there no Khazar surnames among Ashkenazim, or Khazar names for towns in Europe where Jews lived? And why did most Ashkenazi communities speak variations of Yiddish rather than Turkic?

As mentioned, the popularity of the Khazar myth among anti-Semites represents a return of modern anti-Jewish bigotry to the racialism of the 1930's and earlier.

Nearly every anti-Semitic and neo-Nazi website denounces Zionists and Israelis as "Khazars." Web chat lists in which Jews defending Israel are dismissed as "Khazar usurpers" are too numerous to count.

The racialism once again in vogue holds that Jews would only have legitimate claims to the right of self-determination in their homeland if they were appropriately Semitic from a racial point of view. Palestine is part of the Semitic racial lebensraum and those who do not possess the correct pure racial markings have no business being there. Racial purity is suddenly the new basis for national rights.

I discovered scores of neo-Nazi websites claiming that "Khazar Zionists" were really behind the 9/11 attacks. I found thousands of websites claiming that "Khazar Jew-pretenders" are in a conspiratorial league with Freemasons, the Vatican, the Illuminati and others to control the world.

Khazar conspiracists get nuttier by the day; a widely cited Ku Klux Klan website claims that the pro-Israel evangelist Pat Robertson is really a Khazar Jew. The neo-Nazi American Patriots Friends Network claims Khazars are themselves descended from the Magog race and secretly control America.

If we take the racialist argument to its logical conclusion, Palestinian Arabs have the right to exercise all claims to sovereignty in Israel due to their being true racial Jews, while Zionists are non-Jewish Khazars - racial imposters and usurpers.


To make things even sillier, Arabs themselves are, of course, a mix of racial strains, with a particularly large Caucasian component thanks to Arab intermixing with Spanish and Italian Europeans, Caucasian Berbers, Vandals, Goths, and even some Vikings.

The racialist delegitimizing of Zionism as "Khazar imperialism" is smack inside the same insane asylum with the "Jesus was a Palestinian" theory and the claim that all real Jews (from a racial point of view) converted to Islam after the Arab conquest of Palestine in the 7th century and so became Palestinian Arabs.
One can also find countless websites claiming those things.


Steven Plaut, a frequent contributor to The Jewish Press and the new Jewish Press Blog (www.thejewishpress.blogspot.com), is a professor at the University of Haifa. His book "The Scout" is available at Amazon.com. He can be contacted at steveneplaut@yahoo.com.

The bottom line is you are not qualified to judge my heritage!
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Religion is like the worst virus of all time...and the worst part is, there will never be a vaccine for it. :(

Chuck
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Everthing in the world today thats occurring is from the Kazar jew.
Only if you ignore the vast majority of individuals who make up the powers that be, as most aren't Jewish by any account, but rather of various forms of Christian heritage. You are making the same mistake Hitler did, giving "white people" a pass to pin the worlds problems on a small fraction of the powers that be along with anyone who shares their ethnicity.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Ya your from the line of abraham alright . question is which one of the 2 sons
Likely some mix of both considering how many generations ago as that was, assuming the story of Abraham and his sons wasn't just parable to begin with.

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Judaism has never defined Jews on racial grounds. Anyone from any race is welcome as a convert to Judaism as long as he or mshe is sincere.
As I am sure you know, Israel defines Jewishness on racial grounds, as while they do accept converts under strict conditions, they consider also consider atheists and Buddhists and such to be Jews based on their ancestry. I just recently stumbled across an excellent article addressing this ethnic nationalist mindset of Zionism which explains this in detail and provides historical perspective.

Also, the bigoted mindset of Zionists who cling to the idea of Jews being a "race" is on full display currently in belligerent reactions to The Invention of the Jewish People, which discuss the various periods of migrations and conversions throughout history who are the ancestors of the many different people who are Jewish today. I haven't read the book, but it seems to agree with my understanding of the history from what I've seen in articles discussing it, and it was apparently a best seller in both Israel and France before just recently being translated into English.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
No no . I give no passes here . You need to understand whats been said her. He knows what I said . He won;t be happy . Unless he denies he same kind of jew as Rothschild . Trust me on this . You want to know what I said would require hoyrs of reading .

This is the conspirecy father of all conspirecies. I got no problem with jews . So long as there Jews, Jews don't carry the blood of cain in there veins. But what going on in israel today has little to do with the choosen people .
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
No no . I give no passes here . You need to understand whats been said her. He knows what I said . He won;t be happy . Unless he denies he same kind of jew as Rothschild . Trust me on this . You want to know what I said would require hoyrs of reading .

This is the conspirecy father of all conspirecies. I got no problem with jews . So long as there Jews, Jews don't carry the blood of cain in there veins. But what going on in israel today has little to do with the choosen people .

It is sad that you believe that diatribe!
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: kylebisme
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Everthing in the world today thats occurring is from the Kazar jew.
Only if you ignore the vast majority of individuals who make up the powers that be, as most aren't Jewish by any account, but rather of various forms of Christian heritage. You are making the same mistake Hitler did, giving "white people" a pass to pin the worlds problems on a small fraction of the powers that be along with anyone who shares their ethnicity.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Ya your from the line of abraham alright . question is which one of the 2 sons
Likely some mix of both considering how many generations ago as that was, assuming the story of Abraham and his sons wasn't just parable to begin with.

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Judaism has never defined Jews on racial grounds. Anyone from any race is welcome as a convert to Judaism as long as he or mshe is sincere.
As I am sure you know, Israel defines Jewishness on racial grounds, as while they do accept converts under strict conditions, they consider also consider atheists and Buddhists and such to be Jews based on their ancestry. I just recently stumbled across an excellent article addressing this ethnic nationalist mindset of Zionism which explains this in detail and provides historical perspective.

Also, the bigoted mindset of Zionists who cling to the idea of Jews being a "race" is on full display currently in belligerent reactions to The Invention of the Jewish People, which discuss the various periods of migrations and conversions throughout history who are the ancestors of the many different people who are Jewish today. I haven't read the book, but it seems to agree with my understanding of the history from what I've seen in articles discussing it, and it was apparently a best seller in both Israel and France before just recently being translated into English.

I won't debate this with you . Ya I know who left egypt with moses . I am not talking Faith or religion and you dam well know it . Are you a ZIONIST?? Moses was a jew yet the house of pharoah did not know this . Till Moses was favored by pharoah , Than all hell broke lose. Moses was not a black man. Pharoh was yet they did not decern the differance. Kazar jews can infact be decerned, If I except the jewish faith and deny the living word you can call me a jew all day long because of faith religion . But I would still not be a jew. Your own scriptures show the generations and a whole lot of begetting going on . The jews keep inpeckable records of there bloodline . You deny these facts . Ya had 2000 years to to pollute the line yet they failed. Rothschild is KING of zionist he no more jew than I am . You deny being Zionist as I read it. So the line from David to Christ was polluted is what your saying . Excuse please . So whos keeping track of Davids line does not your Messiah come from Davids line. So to know the nessiah arrives you would have to no the bloodlines or does scripture lie , Why did the jews remove book of Enouch from scripture. Who decided this . Tell me were GOD commands this.

A true jew have zero problems with what I just asked. and tell me what I asked. I like your not a zionist. But what your calling a zionist is pure poppy cock. This part bolded

Rothschild is a zionist but not a jew by blood , they scream bloodline inorder to decieve . Your own scriptures show the tracking of generations and whio begotwho .

The bold part your claiming to be zionist yet scripyure is full of what you call zionist ideas of generation tracking to keep the blood lines pure. Does not the the messiah have to be of Davids line . Doesn't not a jew protect the line to keep it pure . For the promised Messiah,



 

JKing106

Platinum Member
Mar 19, 2009
2,193
0
0
/nem"euhsis/, n., pl. nemeses /-seez'/.
1. a source or cause of harm or failure.
2. an unconquerable opponent or rival.
3. (cap.) the ancient Greek goddess of divine retribution.
4. an agent or act of retribution.
5. a forum troll who makes no sense whatsoever, and diminishes the collective IQ of other forum participants with stupidity.
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Are you a ZIONIST??
Not in the slightest, I detest nationalism in general, and ethnic nationalism particularly so. I'm not Jewish either, at least not in any ethnic sense, my ancestors being largely WASP and some Cherokee. Theologically I do consider myself as much Jewish as anything, being a strict monotheist, and most of my early exposure to religion was through reform temple which I went to with friends who looked after me while my father worked Saturdays. However, I've studied all the major religions of the world throughtout my years along with various others, and continue to do so, without any interest in adhering to any particular one.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
But what your calling a zionist is pure poppy cock.
There are many Zionists who cling to the bigoted idea of Jews being a "race", and I'm at a loss as to what would motivate you to suggest I am wrong to state as much. Again, this article does a respectable job explaining as much.

Oh, and seriously, the whole Kazzar conspiracy nonsense you are spewing shows a very distorted understanding of reality. As I said, if you bother to take a good look around at the powers that be, very few of them are Jewish individuals. What's going on now is little different than the Middle Ages, where a few Jews got to play the visible face of the lending industry, but the Church got the bulk of the profits. The only notable difference being that the powers that be have taken a far more ambiguous form since then as have the methods of control, but it's stll mostly old "white" men just the same.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Show me were Iam trolling . there are enough people here that KNow jews track the line of david as many other lines are tracked . This is not being a Zionist by tradition. 2000 years later they call marking the names of generations zionist. You do understand scripture do ya not . The Messiah who the Jews wait on comes from Davids line. You really think they don't want to track this line A real jew that is of Davids line would keep track and marry into pure blood jew . In the hopes of Father or Mothering the Messiah .

What part don't You understand about that . He saying the traditional Jew is a zionist 2000 years after the fact and the incursion of the kazar jew , kazar jews outnumder real jews by 10.000 to 1 so ya this would piss a kazar off . Your great Rothschild is really not rothschild at all the correct name is RATSCHILD. My whole life I read everthing I can get my hands on . I even got to read some forbidden books the HRCC has . I know were most the dirt and lies are ,not all but enough to smell a Ratschild kazar
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: kylebisme
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Are you a ZIONIST??
Not in the slightest, I detest nationalism in general, and ethnic nationalism particularly so. I'm not Jewish either, at least not in any ethnic sense, my ancestors being largely WASP and some Cherokee. Theologically I do consider myself as much Jewish as anything, being a strict monotheist, and most of my early exposure to religion was through reform temple which I went to with friends who looked after me while my father worked Saturdays. However, I've studied all the major religions of the world throughtout my years along with various others, and continue to do so, without any interest in adhering to any particular one.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
But what your calling a zionist is pure poppy cock.
There are many Zionists who cling to the bigoted idea of Jews being a "race", and I'm at a loss as to what would motivate you to suggest I am wrong to state as much. Again, this article does a respectable job explaining as much.

Oh, and seriously, the whole Kazzar conspiracy nonsense you are spewing shows a very distorted understanding of reality. As I said, if you bother to take a good look around at the powers that be, very few of them are Jewish individuals. What's going on now is little different than the Middle Ages, where a few Jews got to play the visible face of the lending industry, but the Church got the bulk of the profits. The only notable difference being that the powers that be have taken a far more ambiguous form since then, but it's stll mostly old "white" men just the same.

who the hell was adderessing you I wasn't

 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
When someone quotes me and then writes a reply, I generally take that to mean the reply is addressed to me.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
As I said mistakes are easy . I assummed that you seen my first post to jeda. Plus the fact your correct . I did quote you and thats not the way I recall it. You want 300 pages of kazar history to read I start linking
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
I would like to know what church your talking about . NOT ROME . You don't get it these are in breeders the ones with the power Ya need to read more than a couple of quick pages . Did ya get all the way back to Nimrod . If you did link it . If not you got alot of research and your not going to find it online FORBiDDEN BOOKS.

The Church your talking about these are not HOLY people. Heres what I want you to do . tell me befor you go find out why Moses was stopped from entering the promised Land . After ya got that part . Than read the Revelations of PAUL . be enlightened.

 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I firmly reject any notion that the religion of Judaism or any other religion or lack thereof governs mid-east behavior.It all goes back to human nature and the politics of pigs, one group wants it all and has the military power to enforce their will, and simply takes what they want.

Any impartial observer has to admit its all one sided and unfair, but the victors are ever inventive in coming up with ways to guild
lip stick on pigs. And come up with reasons to justify the behavior. The individual reasons may be semi plausable, but still can't justify the totally one sided results.

But in an effort to get this thread back to war crimes, we can somewhat liken war to professional sports. And anyone who has ever viewed post game film knows there is a lot more cheating than the ref ever catches. However, the crucial difference being, once cheating is detected, the penalty is paid immediately, and with war crimes it typically takes eight years of more to get the miscreants into a court of law if it ever even happens at all.

Which is why we have so much war crimes going on. If people world wide knew for a certainty that they would be jailed within days of the offense, we would have a lot less war crime.

And be it resolved, Israel committed war crimes in its recent Gaza incursion, and they should be punished ASAP. Lets have no excuses, we have enough lip stick guiding pigs as it is.
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
Thread bookmarked so I can use it as a reference to out all the ethnic cleansing obsessed bigots that do so from their high horse of played out Jewish pity.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
I firmly reject any notion that the religion of Judaism or any other religion or lack thereof governs mid-east behavior.It all goes back to human nature and the politics of pigs, one group wants it all and has the military power to enforce their will, and simply takes what they want.

Any impartial observer has to admit its all one sided and unfair, but the victors are ever inventive in coming up with ways to guild
lip stick on pigs. And come up with reasons to justify the behavior. The individual reasons may be semi plausable, but still can't justify the totally one sided results.

But in an effort to get this thread back to war crimes, we can somewhat liken war to professional sports. And anyone who has ever viewed post game film knows there is a lot more cheating than the ref ever catches. However, the crucial difference being, once cheating is detected, the penalty is paid immediately, and with war crimes it typically takes eight years of more to get the miscreants into a court of law if it ever even happens at all.

Which is why we have so much war crimes going on. If people world wide knew for a certainty that they would be jailed within days of the offense, we would have a lot less war crime.

And be it resolved, Israel committed war crimes in its recent Gaza incursion, and they should be punished ASAP. Lets have no excuses, we have enough lip stick guiding pigs as it is.

Ya need to check out the family trees of these people become enlightened

 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
I would like to know what church your talking about . NOT ROME.
Yes, Rome was "The Church" in Middle Ages Europe.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
You don't get it these are in breeders the ones with the power Ya need to read more than a couple of quick pages . Did ya get all the way back to Nimrod . If you did link it . If not you got alot of research and your not going to find it online FORBiDDEN BOOKS.

The Church your talking about these are not HOLY people. Heres what I want you to do . tell me befor you go find out why Moses was stopped from entering the promised Land . After ya got that part . Than read the Revelations of PAUL . be enlightened.
If you tell me what you'd like me to read, I'd be happy to take a look at it. However, it looks to me like you are spouting speculative arguments as if they were facts, claiming Revelation was the work of Paul being an obvious example.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: kylebisme
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
I would like to know what church your talking about . NOT ROME.
Yes, Rome was "The Church" in Middle Ages Europe.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
You don't get it these are in breeders the ones with the power Ya need to read more than a couple of quick pages . Did ya get all the way back to Nimrod . If you did link it . If not you got alot of research and your not going to find it online FORBiDDEN BOOKS.

The Church your talking about these are not HOLY people. Heres what I want you to do . tell me befor you go find out why Moses was stopped from entering the promised Land . After ya got that part . Than read the Revelations of PAUL . be enlightened.
If you tell me what you'd like me to read, I'd be happy to take a look at it. However, it looks to me like you are spouting speculative arguments as if they were facts, claiming Revelation was the work of Paul being an obvious example.

Really There were more than one revelations by apostles and the false apostle did write one also . Its pretty clear why ROMAN didn't use pauls revelation . Read this and understand why Moses wasn't allowed into the promised land. Also after ya read this do your own research and read Mohameds vision of heaven . LOL

http://www.gnosis.org/library/revpaul2.htm


Ya want read Mary maglins Gosphel what hasn't been destroyed The true 12 apostle who did replace judas. I have almost the ful gosphel . There is much lacking in what you have learned about trueth . What is in marys that you can read is shocking.


 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: Lemon law
I firmly reject any notion that the religion of Judaism or any other religion or lack thereof governs mid-east behavior.It all goes back to human nature and the politics of pigs, one group wants it all and has the military power to enforce their will, and simply takes what they want.

Any impartial observer has to admit its all one sided and unfair, but the victors are ever inventive in coming up with ways to guild
lip stick on pigs. And come up with reasons to justify the behavior. The individual reasons may be semi plausable, but still can't justify the totally one sided results.

But in an effort to get this thread back to war crimes, we can somewhat liken war to professional sports. And anyone who has ever viewed post game film knows there is a lot more cheating than the ref ever catches. However, the crucial difference being, once cheating is detected, the penalty is paid immediately, and with war crimes it typically takes eight years of more to get the miscreants into a court of law if it ever even happens at all.

Which is why we have so much war crimes going on. If people world wide knew for a certainty that they would be jailed within days of the offense, we would have a lot less war crime.

And be it resolved, Israel committed war crimes in its recent Gaza incursion, and they should be punished ASAP. Lets have no excuses, we have enough lip stick guiding pigs as it is.

Ya need to check out the family trees of these people become enlightened

You are so totally wrong Nemesis 1....
http://www.drudge.com/archive/...zar-myth-anti-semitism

The Khazar Myth & Anti-Semitism
It is one of the great ironies of the 21st century that anti-Zionists and anti-Semites on both the Left and the Right, have returned to racialist arguments against Jews that most of us thought had died out after World War II. One of the most bizarre aspects of this "re-racializing" of anti-Semitism is the role played by the Khazar myth.


is one of the great ironies of the 21st century that anti-Zionists and anti-Semites on both the Left and the Right, have returned to racialist arguments against Jews that most of us thought had died out after World War II.

One of the most bizarre aspects of this "re-racializing" of anti-Semitism is the role played by the Khazar myth.

The newly fashionable Khazar mythology holds that modern day Ashkenazim, and especially the European leadership of the Zionist movement, are not Jews at all in the racial sense, but rather descendents from non-Jewish Khazars; therefore, the Khazar "theorists" claim, Zionists and Israelis have no legitimate claims to the Land of Israel.

It would be hard to exaggerate how widespread the misuse of the Khazar myth is among those seeking to delegitimize Israel and Jews today. A recent investigation showed nearly 30,000 websites using the Khazar "theory" as a bludgeon against Israel and Zionism.

Some two hundred websites claim to describe a cabal known as the Khazarian Zionist Bolsheviks (KZV). Neo-Nazi and Holocaust denial organizations and websites are particularly fond of the Khazar myth. It is also growing in popularity among left-wing anti-Zionists.

Arab and Islamofascist propagandists have long bandied about the Ashkenazim as Khazars theory and Iran's genocidal leaders adore it. Al-Jazeera has been using the Khazar story to urge a worldwide Christian religious war against the Khazar pseudo-Jewish imperialists.

Groups promoting the Protocols of the Elders of Zion often cite the nefarious role of Khazars as "proof" of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy (I counted 700 such websites). And even Jewish anti-Zionist cranks like Alfred M. Lilienthal and the Swedish "Israel Shamir" have used the Khazar myth to attack Zionism.

Why are these various groups suddenly interested in a rather esoteric and archaic group of people in Central Asia that disappeared nearly a millennium ago?

The answer is very simple.

According to the Khazar theory of the new anti-Semites, most Jews today, particularly Ashkenazi Jews, are not racially Jews at all but descendents from the Turkic tribe of Khazars, whose ruling class and parts of its rank and file population converted to Judaism in the 8th or early 9th century CE. Hence, argue the racialists, Ashkenazi Jews have no rights to live in the racially Semitic Middle East and especially not in the Land of israel.

Fact and Legend

For Jews, the history of the conversion of the Khazars to Judaism is best known from essays in The Kuzari: In Defense of the Despised Faith, a medieval book composed by the great Spanish poet and philosopher Judah Ha-Levi.

Only part of the book actually deals with the Khazar kingdom, about which little was known, and the historic claims about them in the book are not considered fully reliable.

In any case, The Kuzari purports to report the debates at the Khazar royal court that supposedly led to the Khazar elite's conversion to Judaism. Other senior Jewish officials in the Spanish Muslim regimes actually corresponded with the Khazar kingdom most notably Cordova Rabbi Hasdai ibn Shaprut (whose letters have survived). And the great Iraqi sage Saadia Gaon is believed to have maintained correspondence with Jews in the Khazar kingdom.

It is commonly thought that part of the motivation for the Khazars' conversion was to establish political neutrality for the Khazar kingdom, which faced potential threats from the powers of both Christendom and Islam.

The Khazars themselves left no documentary records. The Arab historian ibn Fadlan wrote about them, but he did so two centuries after the conversions to Judaism had occurred. Some Jews, having sought refuge from Byzantine persecutions, probably lived in the Khazar kingdom long before the conversion of the royalty there.

One ironic historical twist is that the Khazars contributed to the Cyrillic alphabet, in which Russian and some other Slavic languages are written. Saint Cyril came to Khazaria in 860 in an attempt to convert the Khazars to Christianity. Since the Hebrew of the Khazars and Greek were the main alphabets known to St. Cyril and the early Slavs, they borrowed from both.

Western interest in the Khazars was stimulated largely by the 1976 book The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler, a writer better known for his lifelong battles against totalitarianism in all its forms. Koestler's book was largely based on the earlier book The History of the Jewish Khazars, by the historian D.M. Dunlop.


Dunlop rejected the idea that large numbers of Ashkenazi Jews could trace their origins to the Khazars, but not so Koestler. By grossly and sensationally exaggerating the role and numbers of Khazar descendents among European Jewry, Koestler who was a strong Zionist inadvertently provided today's racialist anti-Semites with all the ammunition they could want, and many of them frequently cite his book as the basis for their racialist denunciations of Israel.

A number of more serious books about Khazars are now on the market, including The Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook. Rabbi Bernard Rosensweig was one of the leading figures in debunking the Khazar theory of Ashkenazi Jewish origins. Writing in Tradition (16:5, Fall 1977, pages 139-162), he dismissed it as "wobbly scholarly foundations without historical support."

Likewise, the Swedish archaeologist Bozena Werbart, an expert on the Khazars, wrote: "In the Khazar kingdom, Koestler wanted to see the origin of the eastern European Jewry. Nevertheless, all the historical and linguistic facts contradicted his theories."

As The Encyclopedia of Judaism (1989) emphatically states, "The notion that Ashkenazi Jewry is descended from the Khazars has absolutely no basis in fact."

What Became of the Khazars

The actual Khazar kingdom was partly subjugated by the early Russians in the 10th century, and whatever was left was annihilated as a result of the Mongol invasions of Central Asia.

What exactly became of the Khazar Jews is simply not known. Those who retained their Judaism probably integrated themselves into other Jewish communities around the world. Some groups of Khazars joined the Magyar invasion into what became Hungary and may have merged with local Jews already living in those lands; indeed, archeologists have found Jewish stars in the remains of Hungarian Khazar villages.

Small groups of Khazar mercenaries probably found refuge in other places. Most likely the largest integration of Khazar Jews among other Jews took place in Iran and Iraq, the large communities closest to the Khazar kingdom and with whom close ties had been maintained.

(An urban legend holds that red-haired Jews are descended from Khazars, though that could hardly explain King David, not to mention Esau. Arthur Koestler claimed many were blond with blue eyes.)

In any case, Khazar political existence ended a thousand years ago.

So what are we to make of the Khazar myth concerning Ashkenazi Jews and their supposed lack of legitimate claims to Israel due to their Khazar origins? The greatest irony is that even if the entire Khazar theory of Ashkenazi Jews were correct and virtually none of it is correct it would be entirely irrelevant. Judaism has never defined Jews on racial grounds. Anyone from any race is welcome as a convert to Judaism as long as he or she is sincere.

The biblical Israelites themselves were already a racial hodgepodge. They absorbed the "mixed multitude" that left Egypt together with them at the time of the Exodus. There are biblical references to Jews of different racial features, including the black-skinned Shulamit mentioned in the Song of Songs.

Jews always defined themselves in religious, ethnic-national and at times linguistic terms, but never along racial lines. If all Ashkenazi Jews were indeed converted Khazars, as the racial anti-Zionists claim, they would be no less legitimately Jews and, as such, would have the same legitimate claims to the Jewish homeland as any other group of Jews. (Given the traditional Jewish deference to righteous converts, maybe more so.)


Pseudo-History and Poppycock

The actual details of the Khazar theory concerning European Jewry are simply pseudo-history and crackpot poppycock.

Jews already lived in Europe a thousand years before the Khazar kingdom was formed. There are no genetic markers or indicators at all showing that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Turkic tribes. In fact, there exists considerable genetic evidence showing that European Jews are closer to Levantine and Syrian Arabs than to Central Asians.

After the Mongol invasion most Khazars probably assimilated into the Jewish communities of Iran and Iraq, which of course eventually emerged as important Sephardic centers, formed mainly of Jews with Semitic racial characteristics, descended from migrants and exiled Jews from the Land of Israel. In any case, there are more "Semitic" Sephardic Jews in Israel today than there are European Ashkenazi Jews. And if the Khazars looked Turkic, how on earth could they give Ashkenazi Jews a European complexion?

There are other problems. If all Ashkenazi Jews are descended from converted Khazars, why are there Cohens and Levis among them? One inherits the status of a Cohen (priest) or Levite from one's father. Descendants of converts through the male line can never be a Cohen or a Levite.

And why are there no Khazar surnames among Ashkenazim, or Khazar names for towns in Europe where Jews lived? And why did most Ashkenazi communities speak variations of Yiddish rather than Turkic?

As mentioned, the popularity of the Khazar myth among anti-Semites represents a return of modern anti-Jewish bigotry to the racialism of the 1930's and earlier.

Nearly every anti-Semitic and neo-Nazi website denounces Zionists and Israelis as "Khazars." Web chat lists in which Jews defending Israel are dismissed as "Khazar usurpers" are too numerous to count.

The racialism once again in vogue holds that Jews would only have legitimate claims to the right of self-determination in their homeland if they were appropriately Semitic from a racial point of view. Palestine is part of the Semitic racial lebensraum and those who do not possess the correct pure racial markings have no business being there. Racial purity is suddenly the new basis for national rights.

I discovered scores of neo-Nazi websites claiming that "Khazar Zionists" were really behind the 9/11 attacks. I found thousands of websites claiming that "Khazar Jew-pretenders" are in a conspiratorial league with Freemasons, the Vatican, the Illuminati and others to control the world.

Khazar conspiracists get nuttier by the day; a widely cited Ku Klux Klan website claims that the pro-Israel evangelist Pat Robertson is really a Khazar Jew. The neo-Nazi American Patriots Friends Network claims Khazars are themselves descended from the Magog race and secretly control America.

If we take the racialist argument to its logical conclusion, Palestinian Arabs have the right to exercise all claims to sovereignty in Israel due to their being true racial Jews, while Zionists are non-Jewish Khazars racial imposters and usurpers.

To make things even sillier, Arabs themselves are, of course, a mix of racial strains, with a particularly large Caucasian component thanks to Arab intermixing with Spanish and Italian Europeans, Caucasian Berbers, Vandals, Goths, and even some Vikings.

The racialist delegitimizing of Zionism as "Khazar imperialism" is smack inside the same insane asylum with the "Jesus was a Palestinian" theory and the claim that all real Jews (from a racial point of view) converted to Islam after the Arab conquest of Palestine in the 7th century and so became Palestinian Arabs.

One can also find countless websites claiming those things.

Finally I have done tons of reading about so called DNA tests to prove what nemesis 1 says and the fact remains they are all crap!!

In fact one can almost make a case bordering on extreme recism by those who would make the bogus Kazar or to be more accurate khazar claim that you have made nemesis!

Whats ironic is kylebisme is correct in almost everything he says concerning your kazar arguments!

What is even more ironic is you are asking Kylebisme to read up on the subject when it is you who needs to do a lot of reading!

I will end with this quote from Kylebisme --

Oh, and seriously, the whole Kazzar conspiracy nonsense you are spewing shows a very distorted understanding of reality.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Very nice post Jedi. Thats the way to debate. If you would like to continue lets do it the way you did in the last post.

This is really a nothing article but its the best place for me to start. There will be no winner in this debate . But we can debate the merits of both opinions on true history.

It pretty hard for Kazar jews to refute history totally and because of how they spread out and appealed to so many, I can present a case that has much more fact than you can in disposing those fact . So for a small time here,I will be indentured to you. At the end of my work here, there will be no winner , Just who can bring forth more evidence of the debate .

I undrstand that your side of the debate is truely a hard place to defend from .

I love Israel as much as you . But when something goes terriably wrong I cann't blindly ignor history nor can you . Now as a follower of the living word I have sources you will reject because your a jew. Which is Fine I understand that and so do you . But we are both aware of these facts. I put it to Pen so there is NO misunderstanding on that part .

So the first thing I will say is that in New testment In these times the ending time of the old world . Israel goes against the True GOD . You need not adderess this as its a faith based belief OK .

I will also tell you this I don't believe all of the New testment . I can't and will not except paul as anything other than a worker for the city state of Rome .

At the same time Jews removing Enouch from scriputure is a huge red flag . I would also point out that ONLY MOSES GOD did his own killing , After Moses It was men who Claimed God spoke to them that did make war and Kill in Gods name . Why is that . Why dids GOD stop doing his own killing.

Heres the article I will start with . If you want to contiue the debate simply reply .

http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-history.html This is a very week argument , but so was your link . I have advantage here because all you have is the new jewish history of that state , you have a 2000year gap were Kazar came into being . Were their was NO Israeli state. You have a hard task here. Good luck . I hope you can change my opinion.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Oh! Just to be clear . Jews do try to keep Holy the Day of GOD, You call it the Sabbath . It is saturday according to your faith. I reject both the jewish and Christian views here . It is my belief that God did commands us to keep Holy the day that His work is done .This is the day ADAM is restored to Eden . Gods day of rest Starts at that moment in time .To put aday of week on an omni present GOD would be silly. I understand a day of worship to a very small degree. But I see it more the work of so called Holy men to gain power and wealth. Men should honor God and his commandments every day not 1day a week . I sure you agree with that . Having 1day a week as worship is not a wise thing as people get the idea once a week is enough of GOD things , I reject that notion.

I understand I am nobody , As did Moses understand he was nobody. Just men.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
It is important here the peoples of the west understand the period of time were discussing here and why this is important to my argument .

The dates will be given in this article . It is also important to understand why Jedi was able to post his argument . Who was it that controlled the west. THE HRCC enemy of the Jew . So it was ROME that still controlled the west and It was ROME that contolled written history durring this period .

This period of time was none as the DARK ages when I was in School . Being raised in the Evil church we were told lies that were just unbelievable for that period when the East had no such period of time . Now western scholars deny the Dark ages existed , But the fact remains and its undeniabe the period of time were talking about had little information written about this time period Source any HRCC history book used in there schools from the 1950,s and you will see I am stating facts that can't be denied . That why JEDI was able to use the Article he posted.

The history of Khazaria presents us with a fascinating example of how Jewish life flourished in the Middle Ages. In a time when Jews were persecuted thruout Christian Europe, the kingdom of Khazaria was a beacon of hope. Jews were able to flourish in Khazaria because of the tolerance of the Khazar rulers, who invited Byzantine and Persian Jewish refugees to settle in their country. Due to the influence of these refugees, the Khazars found the Jewish religion to be appealing and adopted Judaism in large numbers.

Most of the available information about the Khazars comes from Arabic, Hebrew, Armenian, Byzantine, and Slavic sources, most of which are reliable. There is also a large quantity of archaeological evidence concerning the Khazars that illuminates multiple aspects of the Khazarian economy (arts and crafts, trade, agriculture, fishing, etc.) as well as burial practices.

Origins. The Khazars were a Turkic1 people who originated in Central Asia. The early Turkic tribes were quite diverse, although it is believed that reddish hair was predominant among them prior to the Mongol conquests. In the beginning, the Khazars believed in Tengri shamanism, spoke a Turkic language, and were nomadic. Later, the Khazars adopted Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, learned Hebrew and Slavic, and became settled in cities and towns thruout the north Caucasus and Ukraine. The Khazars had a great history of ethnic independence extending approximately 800 years from the 5th to the 13th century.

The earliest history of the Khazars in southern Russia, prior to the middle of the 6th century, is hidden in obscurity. From about 550 to 630, the Khazars were part of the Western Turkish Empire, ruled by the Celestial Blue Turks (Kök Turks). When the Western Turkish Empire was broken up as a result of civil wars in the middle of the 7th century, the Khazars successfully asserted their independence. Yet, the Kök kaganate under which they had lived provided the Khazars with their system of government. For example, the Khazars followed the same guidelines as the Kök Turks regarding the succession of kings.

Political power. At its maximum extent, the independent country of Khazaria included the geographic regions of southern Russia, northern Caucasus, eastern Ukraine, Crimea, western Kazakhstan, and northwestern Uzbekistan. Other Turkic groups such as the Sabirs and Bulgars came under Khazar jurisdiction during the 7th century. The Khazars forced some of the Bulgars (led by Asparukh) to move to modern-day Bulgaria, while other Bulgars fled to the upper Volga River region where the independent state of Volga Bulgharia was founded. The Khazars had their greatest power over other tribes in the 9th century, controlling eastern Slavs, Magyars, Pechenegs, Burtas, North Caucasian Huns, and other tribes and demanding tribute from them. Because of their jurisdiction over the area, the Caspian Sea was named the "Khazar Sea", and even today the Azeri, Turkish, Persian, and Arabic languages designate the Caspian by this term (in Turkish, "Hazar Denizi"; in Arabic, "Bahr-ul-Khazar"; in Persian, "Daryaye Khazar").

In addition to their role in indirectly bringing about the creation of the modern Balkan nation of Bulgaria, the Khazars played an even more significant role in European affairs. By acting as a buffer state between the Islamic world and the Christian world, Khazaria prevented Islam from significantly spreading north of the Caucasus Mountains. This was accomplished thru a series of wars known as the Arab-Khazar Wars, which took place in the late 7th and early 8th centuries. The wars established the Caucasus and the city of Derbent as the boundary between the Khazars and the Arabs.

Cities. The first Khazar capital was Balanjar, which is identified with the archaeological site Verkhneye Chir-Yurt. During the 720s, the Khazars transferred their capital to Samandar, a coastal town in the north Caucasus noted for its beautiful gardens and vineyards. In 750, the capital was moved to the city of Itil (Atil) on the edge of the Volga River. In fact, the name "Itil" also designated the Volga River in the medieval age. Itil would remain the Khazar capital for at least another 200 years. Itil, the administrative center of the Khazar kingdom, was located adjacent to Khazaran, a major trading center. In the early 10th century, Khazaran-Itil's population was composed mostly of Muslims and Jews, but a few Christians lived there also. The capital city had many mosques. The king's palace was located on an island nearby, which was surrounded by a brick wall. The Khazars stayed in their capital during the winter, but they lived in the surrounding steppe in the spring and summer to cultivate their crops.

The great capital city of modern Ukraine, Kiev, was founded by Khazars or Hungarians. Kiev is a Turkic place name (Küi = riverbank + ev = settlement). A community of Jewish Khazars lived in Kiev. Other towns of the Khazars, many of which also had important Jewish communities, included Kerch (Bospor), Feodosia, Tamatarkha (Tmutorokan), Chufut-Kale, Sudak, and Sarkel. The local governor of Samandar was Jewish, and it may be assumed that many of the governors of these other localities were also Jewish. A major brick fortress was built in 834 in Sarkel, along the Don River. It was a cooperative Byzantine-Khazar venture, and Petronas Kamateros, a Greek, served as chief engineer during the construction.

Civilization and trade. The staple foods for the Khazars were rice and fish. Barley, wheat, melons, hemp, and cucumbers were also harvested in Khazaria. There were many orchards and fertile regions around the Volga River, which the Khazars depended upon due to the infrequency of rain. The Khazars hunted foxes, rabbits, and beavers to supply the large demand for furs.

Khazaria was an important trade route connecting Asia and Europe. For example, the "Silk Road" was an important link between China, Central Asia, and Europe. Among the things traded along the Khazar trade routes were silks, furs, candlewax, honey, jewelry, silverware, coins, and spices. Jewish Radhanite traders of Persia passed thru Itil on their way to western Europe, China, and other locations. The Iranian Sogdians also made use of the Silk Road trade, and their language and runic letters became popular among the Turks. Khazars traded with the people of Khwarizm (northwest Uzbekistan) and Volga Bulgharia and also with port cities in Azerbaijan and Persia.

The Khazars' dual-monarchy was a Turkic system under which the kagan was the supreme king and the bek was the civilian army leader. The kagans were part of the Turkic Asena ruling family that had provided kagans for other Central Asian nations in the early medieval period. The Khazar kagans had relations with the rulers of the Byzantines, Abkhazians, Hungarians, and Armenians. To some extent, the Khazarian kings influenced the religion of the Khazar people, but they tolerated those who had different religions than their own, so that even when these kings adopted Judaism they still let Greek Christians, pagan Slavs, and Muslim Iranians live in their domains. In the capital city, the Khazars established a supreme court composed of 7 members, and every religion was represented on this judicial panel (according to one contemporary Arab chronicle, the Khazars were judged according to the Torah, while the other tribes were judged according to other laws).

Ancient communities of Jews existed in the Crimean Peninsula, a fact proven by much archaeological evidence. It is significant that the Crimea came under the control of the Khazars. The Crimean Jewish communities were later supplemented by refugee Jews fleeing the Mazdaq rebellion in Persia, the persecutions of Byzantine emperors Leo III and Romanus I Lecapenus, and for a variety of other reasons. Jews came to Khazaria from modern-day Uzbekistan, Armenia, Hungary, Syria, Turkey, Iraq, and many other places, as documented by al-Masudi, the Schechter Letter, Saadiah Gaon, and other accounts. The Arabic writer Dimashqi wrote that these refugee Jews offered their religion to the Khazar Turks and that the Khazars "found it better than their own and accepted it". The Jewish Radhanite traders may have also influenced the conversion. Adopting Judaism was perhaps also a symbol of political independence for Khazaria, holding the balance of power between Muslim Caliphate and the Christian Byzantine Empire.

Under the leadership of kings Bulan and Obadiah, the standard rabbinical form of the Jewish religion spread among the Khazars. King Bulan adopted Judaism in approximately the year 838, after supposedly holding a debate between representatives of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim faiths. The Khazar nobility and many of the common people also became Jews. King Obadiah later established synagogues and Jewish schools in Khazaria. The books of the Mishnah, Talmud, and Torah thus became important to many Khazars. Saint Cyril came to Khazaria in 860 in a Byzantine attempt to convert the Khazars to Christianity, but he was unsuccessful in converting them away from Judaism. He did, however, convince many of the Slavs to adopt Christianity. By the 10th century, the Khazars wrote using Hebrew letters. The major Khazar Jewish documents from that period were written in the Hebrew language. The Ukrainian professor Omeljan Pritsak estimated that there were as many as 30,000 Jews in Khazaria by the 10th century. In 2002, the Swedish numismatist Gert Rispling discovered a Khazar Jewish coin.

In general, the Khazars may be described as a productive and tolerant people, in contact with much of the rest of the world and providing goods and services at home and abroad. Many artifacts from the Khazars, exhibiting their artistic and industrial talents, have survived to the present day.

Decline and fall. During the 10th century, the East Slavs were united under Scandinavian overlordship. A new nation, Kievan Rus, was formed by Prince Oleg. Just as the Khazars had left their mark on other peoples, so too did they influence the Rus. The Rus and the Hungarians both adopted the dual-kingship system of the Khazars. The Rus princes even borrowed the title kagan. Archaeologists recovered a variety of Khazar or Khazar-style objects (including clothing and pottery) from Viking gravesites in Chernigov, Gnezdovo, Kiev, and even Birka (Sweden). The residents of Kievan Rus patterned their legal procedures after the Khazars. In addition, some Khazar words became part of the old East Slavic language: for example, bogatyr ("brave knight") apparently derives from the Khazar word baghatur.

The Rus inherited most of the former Khazar lands in the late 10th century and early 11th century. One of the most devastating defeats came in 965, when Rus Prince Svyatoslav conquered the Khazar fortress of Sarkel. It is believed that he conquered Itil two years later, after which he campaigned in the Balkans. Despite the loss of their nation, the Khazar people did not disappear. Some of them migrated westward into Hungary, Romania, and Poland, mixing with other Jewish communities.2

Notes.
1. Many medieval writers attested to the Khazars' Turkic origins including Theophanes, al-Masudi, Rabbi Yehudah ben Barzillai, Martinus Oppaviensis, and the anonymous authors of the Georgian Chronicle and Chinese chronicle T'ang-shu. The Arabic writer al-Masudi in Kitab at-Tanbih wrote: "...the Khazars... are a tribe of the Turks." (cited in Peter Golden, Khazar Studies, pp. 57-58). T'ang-shu reads: "K'o-sa [Khazars]... belong to the stock of the Turks." (cited in Peter Golden, Khazar Studies, p. 58). In his Chronographia, Theophanes wrote: "During his [Byzantine emperor Heraclius] stay there [in Lazica], he invited the eastern Turks, who are called Chazars, to become his allies." (cited in Theophanes, The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor, translated by Cyril Mango and Roger Scott, 1997, p. 446). The claim that the Khazars were Scythians is completely without merit.
2. Timothy Miller discovered that Jewish Khazars were members of the Jewish community of Pera in the Byzantine Empire around the 11th century (see Timothy S. Miller, "The Legend of Saint Zotikos According to Constantine Akropolites," Analecta Bollandiana vol. 112, 1994, pp. 339-376).