Nasa Global Temperature Difference Map 2008-2012

[ShintaiDK]

Cant be long before the north pole as we know it will be history books only. Should cust 1/3rd of the time and distance tho to sail goods between europe and asia.

 

[momeNt]

Once the pole melts and 1/3 to 2/5 of the population is gone, global warming will be instantly corrected. The Earth knows how to balance itself buddy.

 

[ShintaiDK]

Lets just hope the southpole stays frozen. Then we can settle with some 7 meters searise over time. I doubt a city like Miami for example exist in the year 2100. Its gonna be under water.

For danish people, lets just say the nordic "brotherhood" will come on a trial. Perhaps we can get Norway back

 

[spacejamz]

I wonder what a global temperature difference map would look like right around the time the last Ice Age ended...

 

[Olikan]

Once the pole melts and 1/3 to 2/5 of the population is gone, global warming will be instantly corrected. The Earth knows how to balance itself buddy.

instantly balanced!

it will take years for the carbon get "trapped" again

 

[Jaskalas]

Joe Bastardi: Fact is the global temp against the satellite running means was only plus .04 last yr

 

[Doppel]

Temps in Canada went up 2 degrees C in 4 years?

 

[PricklyPete]

So my property in Denver will increase in value?

 

[momeNt]

So my property in Denver will increase in value?

Do you think the oxygenation of the air there will go up once the sea level is higher? Lots of people with that sickle cell trait can't live in Denver.

 

[Jaskalas]

Nasa Global Temperature Difference Map 2008-2012

If I had to guess, your map OP, would be the average of 2008 through 2012 compared to the 1960-1990 climatology. It still doesn't make sense with a 132 year difference of only 0.7C, but that's the best I can summarize for how such a propaganda map was crafted.

Frankly it doesn't make sense at all.

 

[nehalem256]

Do you think the oxygenation of the air there will go up once the sea level is higher? Lots of people with that sickle cell trait can't live in Denver.

I would imagine yes. If water levels rise then the air that the water displaces has to go somewhere.

 

[Juddog]

7 meters ocean level above normal?

Good thing the area I live in is over 200 feet above sea level.

I guess now is a good time to buy property in the north; when those higher temps start hitting, everybody will want to move here.

 

[Olikan]

If I had to guess, your map OP, would be the average of 2008 through 2012 compared to the 1960-1990 climatology. It still doesn't make sense with a 132 year difference of only 0.7C, but that's the best I can summarize for how such a propaganda map was crafted.

Frankly it doesn't make sense at all.

that link, actually proves that the temperature went up

 

[gevorg]

the range of 2008-2012 is nothing, its like analyzing where the some decades old stock is going based on 5 seconds of trade data

 

[dank69]

the range of 2008-2012 is nothing, its like analyzing where the some decades old stock is going based on 5 seconds of trade data

I think it is pretty conclusive evidence that global warming is Obama's fault.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Without context...this graph is meaningless. Link please.

 

[zsdersw]

I think it is pretty conclusive evidence that global warming is Obama's fault.

Everything that ever was and ever will be wrong with America and the world is Obama's fault.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Everything that ever was and ever will be wrong with America and the world is Obama's fault.

Does this mean that the statute of limitations has finally run out for blaming Bush for everything wrong with America and the world?

 

[zsdersw]

Does this mean that the statute of limitations has finally run out for blaming Bush for everything wrong with America and the world?

Yes, but you'd be just as stupid for blaming everything on Obama as they were for blaming everything on Bush.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Yes, but you'd be just as stupid for blaming everything on Obama as they were for blaming everything on Bush.

You and dank69 apparently have a lot in common it seems.

 

[zsdersw]

You and dank69 apparently have a lot in common it seems.

No more than you and spidey07 do.

 

[ShintaiDK]

If I had to guess, your map OP, would be the average of 2008 through 2012 compared to the 1960-1990 climatology. It still doesn't make sense with a 132 year difference of only 0.7C, but that's the best I can summarize for how such a propaganda map was crafted.

Frankly it doesn't make sense at all.

The "propaganda" map...

Image Credit: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.



In 1880 is CO2 level was 285ppm. In 1960 it was 315ppm and now its 390ppm.

 

[sm625]

2008 to 2012 is almost exactly the trough to current peak of solar cycle 24. They're gonna keep pumping this crap out until cycle #24 peaks and than all this crap will stop. Notice how they dont post charts comparing 2004 with 2008, the peak-to-trough of solar cycle 23. If they did they would have people thinking we was heading right into an ice age.

Where is the common sense amongst people anymore?

TLDR: We're in "late May" of solar cycle 24. 2008 was "January". 2008-2012 is "January to May". Yes it got warmer from january to may. Wow that is intense.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

The "propaganda" map...

Image Credit: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Do you understand the concept of "cherry picking"? Do you understand that temperature fluctuation over a 5 year interval is meaningless?

I'm starting to worry about you.

 

[Triumph]

If CO2 is the cause, then just plant more trees. A LOT more. That's fine with me, there's plenty of room for it and trees are pretty. Let's go, hurry up.

Also, stop off shoring all of our jobs to places in the 3rd world that don't have emissions controls. We keep er jerbs, and they don't get to pollute. Win/win.