• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nasa Global Temperature Difference Map 2008-2012

ShintaiDK

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Cant be long before the north pole as we know it will be history books only. Should cust 1/3rd of the time and distance tho to sail goods between europe and asia.

nasa-globalwarming.jpg

800px-mauna_loa_carbon_dioxide-en-svg.png
 
Last edited:
Once the pole melts and 1/3 to 2/5 of the population is gone, global warming will be instantly corrected. The Earth knows how to balance itself buddy.
 
Lets just hope the southpole stays frozen. Then we can settle with some 7 meters searise over time. I doubt a city like Miami for example exist in the year 2100. Its gonna be under water.

For danish people, lets just say the nordic "brotherhood" will come on a trial. Perhaps we can get Norway back 😉
 
I wonder what a global temperature difference map would look like right around the time the last Ice Age ended...
 
momeNt said:
Once the pole melts and 1/3 to 2/5 of the population is gone, global warming will be instantly corrected. The Earth knows how to balance itself buddy.
Click to expand...

instantly balanced!

it will take years for the carbon get "trapped" again
 
momeNt said:
Do you think the oxygenation of the air there will go up once the sea level is higher? Lots of people with that sickle cell trait can't live in Denver.
Click to expand...

I would imagine yes. If water levels rise then the air that the water displaces has to go somewhere.
 
7 meters ocean level above normal?

Good thing the area I live in is over 200 feet above sea level. 😀

I guess now is a good time to buy property in the north; when those higher temps start hitting, everybody will want to move here.
 
the range of 2008-2012 is nothing, its like analyzing where the some decades old stock is going based on 5 seconds of trade data 🙂
 
Jaskalas said:
If I had to guess, your map OP, would be the average of 2008 through 2012 compared to the 1960-1990 climatology. It still doesn't make sense with a 132 year difference of only 0.7C, but that's the best I can summarize for how such a propaganda map was crafted.

Frankly it doesn't make sense at all.
Click to expand...

The "propaganda" map...

Image Credit: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

🙄

In 1880 is CO2 level was 285ppm. In 1960 it was 315ppm and now its 390ppm.
 
Last edited:
2008 to 2012 is almost exactly the trough to current peak of solar cycle 24. They're gonna keep pumping this crap out until cycle #24 peaks and than all this crap will stop. Notice how they dont post charts comparing 2004 with 2008, the peak-to-trough of solar cycle 23. If they did they would have people thinking we was heading right into an ice age.

Where is the common sense amongst people anymore?

TLDR: We're in "late May" of solar cycle 24. 2008 was "January". 2008-2012 is "January to May". Yes it got warmer from january to may. Wow that is intense.
 
Last edited:
ShintaiDK said:
The "propaganda" map...

Image Credit: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

🙄
Click to expand...
Do you understand the concept of "cherry picking"? Do you understand that temperature fluctuation over a 5 year interval is meaningless?

I'm starting to worry about you.
 
Last edited:
If CO2 is the cause, then just plant more trees. A LOT more. That's fine with me, there's plenty of room for it and trees are pretty. Let's go, hurry up.

Also, stop off shoring all of our jobs to places in the 3rd world that don't have emissions controls. We keep er jerbs, and they don't get to pollute. Win/win.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top