2011 Charger R/T hits 60 in 5.3 seconds with the 5.7L. It's rated 25mpg on the highway.
SRT8 is so much more though. That 2011 still has that fucked up scalloping.
DO NUT WUNT!
well to many a 6 sec vs 5 sec 0-60 is 'close'.
Ok DBZ. You can only make the same point so many times before we call troll on your ass. Alky is doing his thinking on the forum out loud. If it bothers you that much just step on our of his thread.
We've all gotten our teasing in now let him get his advice.
Be a baller like me and just buy two cars.
Maybe if you weren't so focused on typographical errors you'd be more successful in life.
If you like that GT500 so much why don't you buy it?
I'm finding about the same times for the 10 6.1L and the 11 5.7L ...Low 5's and the 11 is a much better and safer car. The 11 probably handles as well, too.
It's not trolling, it's calling him out on his hypocrisy, he's not thinking out loud in the slightest:
From only a few hours ago.
Definitely like the new interior...not crazy about the body changes though especially that scalloping on the side. I will test drive one if they are out prior to my final purchase.
The mileage is greatly improved as well with cylinder deactivation.
My 08 Grand Cherokee 5.7L with MDS runs on 4 cylinders a lot.
But MDS does not make anywhere near a 25% improvement on the highway.
More like 5-10%.
If mileage on the SRT-8 is up 25%, it's not from MDS.
dude your little M3 is hardly a $70k car....fucking idiot.
the newer m3's are 70k cars at least.
What's with the enormous chip on your shoulder?
those times are wrong then...you can head over to any of the Charger fourms and see they both don't run the same times. Also there is a lot more to the SRT8 than just the times.
Direct head to head...5.7 and V6 in 2010 vs 2011
http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/charger-2010.html
The 6.1 vs 6.2 is not featured. People have dipped into the 4's with them.
6.2? It's 6.4...are you sure you know what cars you are talking about?
Your article doesn't say what you claimed, imo.
A 2011 Charger R/T 5.7L has a similar 0-60 time as a 2010 Charger SRT8 6.1L. I'm sticking with that opinion. They are quite close to each other.
it might show more an improvement in epa ratings, but real world it's 5-10% for everything that is out there from any manufacturer. If you are a particularly aggressive driver it will be closer to 0, but why would anybody try to drive his srt8 charger aggressively?![]()
Sorry bro...I don't spend all day learning all the model names and numbers...
5.7's turn 6 secs or more...6.x at least a full second less. Like I said we all know you think that is close....it's not though in reality.
It's clear you will never own either.
but thanks I think.?
At the track the R/T rips off the dash to 60 mph from a standstill in 5.4 seconds and dispenses with the quarter-mile in 13.7 seconds at 102.8 mph.
What's with the enormous chip on your shoulder?
k. bro, you aren't helping.
Go buy an AMD chip or something.
It's clear you somehow think cheaper is always better. Your 2008 GC doesn't cost more than a 2011 R/T.
Sticker was $42K on my GC, and I ain't your bro...
2011 Charger R/T Max sticker $35K...
My sig is from way back, so try to think up a better smart-aleck reference to it...
Tiny, baby penis explains a lot of his posts.
Sticker was $42K on my GC, and I ain't your bro...
2011 Charger R/T Max sticker $35K...
My sig is from way back, so try to think up a better smart-aleck reference to it...
Yeah dude. That's like someone talking about their 1985 Cutlass 'stickering' more than a new car.
