MJ verdict reached! NOT GUILTY!!!

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EKKC

Diamond Member
May 31, 2005
5,895
0
0
Originally posted by: ttown
Originally posted by: loki8481
so hey, what about that Iraq thing?

maybe the media will go back to covering real news... at least until some white girl gets kidnapped again.
Iraq?
More importantly, I wonder what Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes think about the verdict.

Katie Holmes is changing her religion to Scientology because she doesn't like the word Jesus Juice is now another word for Alcohol, meanwhile on Wolf Blitzer tonight they interview both Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt on the verdict and on the Today Show a previous Gitmo detainee reacts to the MJ verdict
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: loki8481
so hey, what about that Iraq thing?

maybe the media will go back to covering real news... at least until some white girl gets kidnapped again.

I'm sure they'll dig up a sex scandal or something they can cover. I mean anything so they don't actually go back to covering what is real news.

I've got it!

a rich white sorority girl will get kidnapped from Michael Jackson's house. her body will later be found buried next to the elephant man's bones.
 

anxi80

Lifer
Jul 7, 2002
12,294
2
0
Originally sung by: mos def
:music: you can laugh and criticize michael jackson if you wanna/
woody allen, molested and married his step-daughter/
same press kicking dirt on michael's name/
show woody and soon-ye at the playoff game. :music:
 

Kenazo

Lifer
Sep 15, 2000
10,429
1
81
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: ironcrotch
Now comes the civil lawsuit! $$$$

Oh yea, the prosecutor will get the pink slip.

Yup, there it only needs to be plausible that MJ did these things to the kid. They'll milk him dry yet.


Considering that he got off of every single one of the charges, it's unlikely that they'll find him guilty of something in civil court.

Guilt isn't important in civil court. In criminal court you have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the person is guilty, in civil court you just have to show that it's plausible that it happened.
 

KingPhil

Golden Member
Apr 27, 2000
1,154
0
0
Our judicial system is going to hell in a hand basket. Just look at the guy....... looks alone should have convicted that freak!
 

bmacd

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
10,869
1
0
it's no surprise michael jackson got off again. It's sheer irony that he is getting off on charges of "getting off" again.

-=bmacd=-
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
Originally posted by: bmacd
it's no surprise michael jackson got off again. It's sheer irony that he is getting off on charges of "getting off" again.

-=bmacd=-
Welcome to page 5.

 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Kenazo


Guilt isn't important in civil court. In criminal court you have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the person is guilty, in civil court you just have to show that it's plausible that it happened.

I think you need a little more proof than just that. I can show how it's "plausible" that you smacked me in my face, but proving that it actually happened is something else entirely. In this country you don't punish people because they "could have" done something, you punish them because you've proven that they DID do something.
 

Ime

Diamond Member
May 3, 2001
3,661
0
76
Well, if he really is a child molester, we'll find out eventually. Child molesters can't stop you know, they keep doing it. They can't be cured. So if he really did do it, we'll find out the next time he gets caught with his hands down some poor kid's pants.

:(
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
Originally posted by: apologetic
That jury must be full of absolute tards. Same as the OJ trial.

I think the prosecution was full of tards if they couldn't prove one single count. The jury only acts on the case presented to them.
 

BCYL

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
7,803
0
71
There was just too much reasonable doubt in this case, i think he did it but i guess the verdict was also fair...

maybe this will kill his career once and for all...
 

apologetic

Senior member
Oct 28, 2000
879
0
0
Originally posted by: Yossarian
Originally posted by: apologetic
That jury must be full of absolute tards. Same as the OJ trial.

I think the prosecution was full of tards if they couldn't prove one single count. The jury only acts on the case presented to them.

You are correct, the prosecution is to blame also. But looking at Jackson's other exploits, this jury should have seen what is really going on here. THEY CAUGHT HIM THIS TIME.

He got away with it many times, and he will do it again. I hope he is never allowed near another child for the rest of his life.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
the hate in here is amazing.

If they COULDNT prove any counts....then they COULDNT.

You haters reasoning why "he is guilty anyway" does not make any sense...because of "he looks like a freak"...or "the jury is full of tards"..

I am glad i am NOT living in a society where the majority of people thinks like those hater people...then i might also straight move to communist china or similiar countreis and have trials SOLELY based on pre-judgement and HATE and opinions of immature people like stated here in this thread by some people.
 

apologetic

Senior member
Oct 28, 2000
879
0
0
Originally posted by: flexy
the hate in here is amazing.

If they COULDNT prove any counts....then they COULDNT.

You haters reasoning why "he is guilty anyway" does not make any sense...because of "he looks like a freak"...or "the jury is full of tards"..

I am glad i am NOT living in a society where the majority of people thinks like those hater people...then i might also straight move to communist china or similiar countreis and have trials SOLELY based on pre-judgement and HATE and opinions of immature people like stated here in this thread by some people.

You're right. I HATE injustice. I HATE all evil things, I think they should be punished. Don't you? Michael Jackson deserves punishment, because of these activities and others in his past. That's all I'm saying.