werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
Well said.Any government who sends the innocent to prison to placate a mob needs to be removed even if it requires force. What you suggested cannot be allowed.
Well said.Any government who sends the innocent to prison to placate a mob needs to be removed even if it requires force. What you suggested cannot be allowed.
Any government who sends the innocent to prison to placate a mob needs to be removed even if it requires force. What you suggested cannot be allowed.
You mean the video that was officially released by the PD? Are you so out of touch with this case you don't know they officially released a video of the robbery Brown committed right before he was killed?
Your idea of a fair trial is one operating on the presumption that Wilson had to be doing something wrong/racist, which is plainly obvious when you describe your idiotic imagined version of the events as "most likely."Was there an investigation done on the robbery? Were the witnesses interviewed? All I have seen is an incident report that basically narrated what was on the video.
And yes I could be out of touch with this case. I have no vested interest in it other than my desire for people to be given a fair trial. There has been a lot of leaks in this case and I haven't kept up with what has been proven factual or not. Have you seen me make a statement of fact about the details of this case?
I simply countered a posters comment that this case was over and the truth is out so long as you believe Wilson's version of events. I then proposed what I believe could have happened based on what I know. I got some details wrong that didn't affect how I believed the turn of events happened and I admitted I was wrong. People are claiming to know browns state of mind but are basing it on an incident that may or may not be allowed in court, therefore claiming to know browns state of mind to support Wilson's claims is rather weak, especially when other witnesses have a contradictory story.
If you wish to dismiss what I believed happen then provide some solid facts. Someone committing a "strong arm" robbery in the manner brown did is not a guarantee that he would physically confront an officer. Does that mean I think it's not possible? No, it's just means we don't have all the facts and that there is more than one possible turn of events.
Any government who sends the innocent to prison to placate a mob needs to be removed even if it requires force. What you suggested cannot be allowed.
Your idea of a fair trial is one operating on the presumption that Wilson had to be doing something wrong/racist, which is plainly obvious when you describe your idiotic imagined version of the events as "most likely."
Um.... so what is your solution?!!
You know for a fact that if they let this cop off the hook, the first round of rioting is gonna look tame in comparison.
QFT. Join steeplerot.Lol! I guess if you say so! You can't argue with that stupidity!
Any government who sends the innocent to prison to placate a mob needs to be removed even if it requires force. What you suggested cannot be allowed.
The 13th century justice system called and says hi.Proven? That is doubtful.
In any event, won't this whole problem go away if we just throw Wilson in jail for a couple of years? Wouldn't it be worth it to avoid the rioting and mayhem? I get the feeling that the violence will never stop until we as a nation do something to punish Wilson (regardless of whether he did anything wrong or not).
Proven? That is doubtful.
In any event, won't this whole problem go away if we just throw Wilson in jail for a couple of years? Wouldn't it be worth it to avoid the rioting and mayhem? I get the feeling that the violence will never stop until we as a nation do something to punish Wilson (regardless of whether he did anything wrong or not).
Proven? That is doubtful.
In any event, won't this whole problem go away if we just throw Wilson in jail for a couple of years? Wouldn't it be worth it to avoid the rioting and mayhem? I get the feeling that the violence will never stop until we as a nation do something to punish Wilson (regardless of whether he did anything wrong or not).
I thought he was coming around after he realized conservatives aren't what's portrayed on msnbc.You have to be one of the most monumentally stupid people to post on this forum.
The things you say, if anything more than abject trolling, are so woefully ignorant and wrong-headed I truly feel sorry for you.
You are as big a punch line on these forum as McOwned. That's really saying something.
How about "any government who sends the innocent person to prison"...end of sentence?
Of course the sentiment covers more, but my response was to a specific post and context. If Wilson were to not be indicted I'd like to think you wouldn't support such an act.
Proven? That is doubtful.
In any event, won't this whole problem go away if we just throw Wilson in jail for a couple of years? Wouldn't it be worth it to avoid the rioting and mayhem? I get the feeling that the violence will never stop until we as a nation do something to punish Wilson (regardless of whether he did anything wrong or not).
Jesus Christ, at least pretend to throw him in jail. You can let him out when everybody is distracted. This doesn't look like its gonna end well.
That is by far and away the stupidest thing I have ever seen anyone post on here!
" Regardless of whether he did anything wrong or not. "
Really? You cannot be serious.
Do you even know what equal treatment means? Has anything that has gone on since the incident been fair to anyone? Mobs cannot commit unjust acts against whomever they decide should be a target, being supported by others for, you tell me why you support them. A lot more has taken place than simply people standing around in pursuit of truth and hoping for justice.My point was the criminal justice systems affords more of a leeway to Wilson as opposed to Brown. I wish people would have more concern for equal treatment under the law.
I strongly disagree. Were the mobs satisfied with a not-guilty verdict in the Zimmerman trial? No.The so called mobs are only calling for an indictment, not prison.
I guess he expects Officer Wilson to just take one for the team, you know, trade one loss for the common good. I wonder if he intends to be one of the silver backs who help burn down the city and break shit? Yes I said silver backs. People who act like fucking Gorillas are not human beings.....they're animals.
You fail at basic biology.
My point was the criminal justice systems affords more of a leeway to Wilson as opposed to Brown. I wish people would have more concern for equal treatment under the law.
The so called mobs are only calling for an indictment, not prison.
My point was the criminal justice systems affords more of a leeway to Wilson as opposed to Brown. I wish people would have more concern for equal treatment under the law.
The so called mobs are only calling for an indictment, not prison.
Any government who sends the innocent to prison to placate a mob needs to be removed even if it requires force. What you suggested cannot be allowed.
Well, I agree it says quite a lot about Brown at that particular moment in time, likely including when he had his run-in with Brown. I think though that this has been vastly overplayed. Lots of people have done things which are stupid and even evil when high. The totality of a person is not one afternoon, and while I'm not at all buying the witness' story that Brown was ministering to his soul and merely took a short break to rob a convenience store before returning, neither do I think this necessarily makes Brown a thug. It says something about Brown; it does not say everything about Brown.
