See above.
What industry do you work in?From the links:
Buying a better car is a downside for the customer?
The laws are clear here. If the lender isn't following them, the state can take their license. And we're required to have pamphlets on the counter detailing their rights. And the notice of defaults have to be sent certified mail. But like I said, there are assholes in every industry and there are magistrates that do whatever they like.
Of course loan loses are the incentive for the devices. Making $$ is why they're open not as a public service. Who are these "others" that you're talking about? Poor loan decisions affects the lender only not any financial system. There isn't a way that I know of to package these loans and sell them to the public like what happened in the mortgage industry.
UI is paid by state govts, which is funded by dedicated employer taxes. Yes and if the employee gets fired for a cause, they might not get any unemployment so that's not hurting the state or the employer. Here, if an ex employee gets unemployment, the employer's rate goes up and they pay more into the system.
This doesn't make the cars any more affordable for the buyer right? This is already a high-risk pool with high default rates and limited financial means. So where is the risk going? If I've learned one thing from the financial crisis it is questioning these cases.
This does facilitate foolish buyers into taking more loan risk as the incentives for the natural counter-balance, the lender, are lessened as well. (Other notable tales of caution: Mortgage backed securities/subprime loans/global financial crisis; govt student loan guarantees/ tuition growth>>inflation/ massive levels of student debt)
These devices are powerful weapons for the lenders, that's why they are being used. Lenders can force debt prioritization in their favor, but seeing as borrowers have not suddenly become more financially stable, the risks have to go
somewhere, be that family members, welfare, foodstamps, UI, etc etc. as having a car is vital to having decent employment in most all of the US.
I don't want to conflate the issue, but the potential for abuse and collateral damage is real, so the devices need proper oversight and regulation, that's all.
Personally, I think the high rates of default are a clear sign that these borrowers are buying products that are not truly affordable and need to be looking at other solutions. Just insulating the lenders is not the best of them imo.