Darkhawk28
Diamond Member
- Dec 22, 2000
- 6,759
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Yes, the truth is a b1tch isn't it?
Apparently as your side keeps losing.
Hurts eh?
Because you lying your f*cking asses off.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Yes, the truth is a b1tch isn't it?
Apparently as your side keeps losing.
Hurts eh?
Hilarious! Both sides accusing the other side of being a "liar" and "unconcerned with truth." Who'd a thunk it? Fact is, both Democrats AND Republicans are truth-distorting, hyperbole-engaging, rat-bastards. In other news, SKY TOTALLY BLUE!Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Left thinks they're concerned with truth. Truth just happens to be whatever fuels their flames. For them, truth is whatever they agree with.
Third Reich, gulags, religious facists, Hitler, Pol Pot, faked 9/11, OBL's a puppet, etc etc (oh, and Howard Dean)..... Their "truth" is Comedy Central material. The slow burn of the Dems is reaching critical mass.
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, we have come to expect this from the corrupt administration.
I would rather lose honestly then cheat and lie to win anyday.
sooner or later it will be time to pay the piper...
Because you lying your f*cking asses off.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, we have come to expect this from the corrupt administration.
I would rather lose honestly then cheat and lie to win anyday.
sooner or later it will be time to pay the piper...
You dont act like it.
Because you lying your f*cking asses off.
Sound like a sore loser to me.
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, we have come to expect this from the corrupt administration.
I would rather lose honestly then cheat and lie to win anyday.
sooner or later it will be time to pay the piper...
You dont act like it.
Because you lying your f*cking asses off.
Sound like a sore loser to me.
When you lose against lies, you stand on your principles.
When you win on lies, you should STFU.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.
The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.
two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill
I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.
The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.
Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.
You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?
They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.
Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
HereOriginally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And like Kennedy's father did, and like many people with money did back in the 30s.Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Maybe TLC means that those on the left shouldn't have been isolationists and should have made a couple bucks off of the Nazis like grandpappy Bush did?
But hey. Let's focus on some tenuous financial connections to make even further exaggerated and hyperbolic claims. Anything to rant about Bush, eh? :roll:
We all know about Union Bank having their assets seized for colluding with the Nazis before and during WWII.
Do you have any proof of your claim chicken?
and
Here
Don't let the facts hit you in the head on the way out, please.
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.
The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.
two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill
I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.
The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.
Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.
You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?
They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.
Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.
Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.
I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.
Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
HereOriginally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And like Kennedy's father did, and like many people with money did back in the 30s.Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Maybe TLC means that those on the left shouldn't have been isolationists and should have made a couple bucks off of the Nazis like grandpappy Bush did?
But hey. Let's focus on some tenuous financial connections to make even further exaggerated and hyperbolic claims. Anything to rant about Bush, eh? :roll:
We all know about Union Bank having their assets seized for colluding with the Nazis before and during WWII.
Do you have any proof of your claim chicken?
and
Here
Don't let the facts hit you in the head on the way out, please.
Thanks for two of the most damning articles I've seen on the Bushnazis.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.
The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.
two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill
I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.
The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.
Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.
You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?
They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.
Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.
Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.
I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.
Which is irresponsible when looking at the differences in both the camps.
Pissing on a book and gassing Jews by the hundreds are light years apart.
Originally posted by: russianpower
I really love P&N.
With ignorant liberals blaming everything that happened from the beginning of time on Bush and using rhetoric to answer arguments without providing any proof.
Cool-aid drinkers, don't believe in science....:roll: Keep feeding those lies to yourself. After all you are the only ones buying it.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.
Yes the one share covered with the blood of jews when the company was liquadated for a cool 1.5 mil in 1951. Pretty nice chunk 'o cash for one share eh?
His buisness partner Thyssen (writer of the book "I Paid Hitler") was striaght up arrested under the Trading With the Enemy Act in 1942.
"a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence.
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.
The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.
two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill
I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.
The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.
Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.
You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?
They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.
Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.
Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.
I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
HereOriginally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And like Kennedy's father did, and like many people with money did back in the 30s.Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Maybe TLC means that those on the left shouldn't have been isolationists and should have made a couple bucks off of the Nazis like grandpappy Bush did?
But hey. Let's focus on some tenuous financial connections to make even further exaggerated and hyperbolic claims. Anything to rant about Bush, eh? :roll:
We all know about Union Bank having their assets seized for colluding with the Nazis before and during WWII.
Do you have any proof of your claim chicken?
and
Here
Don't let the facts hit you in the head on the way out, please.
Thanks for two of the most damning articles I've seen on the Bushnazis.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):
A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.
B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.
You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.
I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.
We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.
THere's no real point in discussing this since you obviously want to remain superficial about it to make a sound-byte, and ignore the actual facts.Originally posted by: BBond
All of the partners had one share and the rest were owned by the Harrimans. Are you saying aiding the Nazis was OK as long as you only owned one share of the U.S. bank that helped them? And KNOWINGLY as well?
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..
Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.
The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm
30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..
Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.
The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm
30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.
You said this ""a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence. "
Either he was managing or not. Sounds like you are telling a lie.
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..
Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.
The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm
30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.
You said this ""a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence. "
Either he was managing or not. Sounds like you are telling a lie.
take it up with dutch intellegence in ww2, I was not alive, they wrote it not me dude, sorry.
The cool 1.5 mil in 1951 blood money is the thing that sets off alarms for me though.
I like money just like the next guy but if I had that stock and I knew where the cash came from I would have donated it to jewish familys or something...wtf?
That is a major ethics issue in my eyes.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.
The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.
two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill
I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.
The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.
Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.
You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?
They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.
Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.
Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.
I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.
Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):
A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.
B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.
You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.
I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.
We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
[
Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):
A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.
B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.
You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.
I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.
We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.
