• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Minority whip swan dives into the deep end of the hyperbole pool

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Left thinks they're concerned with truth. Truth just happens to be whatever fuels their flames. For them, truth is whatever they agree with.

Third Reich, gulags, religious facists, Hitler, Pol Pot, faked 9/11, OBL's a puppet, etc etc (oh, and Howard Dean)..... Their "truth" is Comedy Central material. The slow burn of the Dems is reaching critical mass.
Hilarious! Both sides accusing the other side of being a "liar" and "unconcerned with truth." Who'd a thunk it? Fact is, both Democrats AND Republicans are truth-distorting, hyperbole-engaging, rat-bastards. In other news, SKY TOTALLY BLUE!

:roll:
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, we have come to expect this from the corrupt administration.

I would rather lose honestly then cheat and lie to win anyday.

sooner or later it will be time to pay the piper...

You dont act like it.

Because you lying your f*cking asses off.

Sound like a sore loser to me.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, we have come to expect this from the corrupt administration.

I would rather lose honestly then cheat and lie to win anyday.

sooner or later it will be time to pay the piper...

You dont act like it.

Because you lying your f*cking asses off.

Sound like a sore loser to me.

When you lose against lies, you stand on your principles.

When you win on lies, you should STFU.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, we have come to expect this from the corrupt administration.

I would rather lose honestly then cheat and lie to win anyday.

sooner or later it will be time to pay the piper...

You dont act like it.

Because you lying your f*cking asses off.

Sound like a sore loser to me.

When you lose against lies, you stand on your principles.

When you win on lies, you should STFU.

Please tell us the great principals of the democratic party that the republicans lied about.
 
Jun 8, 2005
50
0
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.


The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.

two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill

I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.

The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.

Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.


You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?

They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.

Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.

Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.

I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.


 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Maybe TLC means that those on the left shouldn't have been isolationists and should have made a couple bucks off of the Nazis like grandpappy Bush did?
And like Kennedy's father did, and like many people with money did back in the 30s.

But hey. Let's focus on some tenuous financial connections to make even further exaggerated and hyperbolic claims. Anything to rant about Bush, eh? :roll:

We all know about Union Bank having their assets seized for colluding with the Nazis before and during WWII.

Do you have any proof of your claim chicken?
Here

and

Here

Don't let the facts hit you in the head on the way out, please.

Thanks for two of the most damning articles I've seen on the Bushnazis.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.


The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.

two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill

I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.

The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.

Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.


You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?

They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.

Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.

Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.

I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.

Which is irresponsible when looking at the differences in both the camps.

Pissing on a book and gassing Jews by the hundreds are light years apart.

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Maybe TLC means that those on the left shouldn't have been isolationists and should have made a couple bucks off of the Nazis like grandpappy Bush did?
And like Kennedy's father did, and like many people with money did back in the 30s.

But hey. Let's focus on some tenuous financial connections to make even further exaggerated and hyperbolic claims. Anything to rant about Bush, eh? :roll:

We all know about Union Bank having their assets seized for colluding with the Nazis before and during WWII.

Do you have any proof of your claim chicken?
Here

and

Here

Don't let the facts hit you in the head on the way out, please.

Thanks for two of the most damning articles I've seen on the Bushnazis.
Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.


The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.

two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill

I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.

The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.

Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.


You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?

They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.

Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.

Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.

I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.

Which is irresponsible when looking at the differences in both the camps.

Pissing on a book and gassing Jews by the hundreds are light years apart.

You gotta start somewhere. As the old saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: russianpower
I really love P&N.
With ignorant liberals blaming everything that happened from the beginning of time on Bush and using rhetoric to answer arguments without providing any proof.
Cool-aid drinkers, don't believe in science....:roll: Keep feeding those lies to yourself. After all you are the only ones buying it.

If you really love P&N so much why don't you come here more often and offer your input as opposed to trolling in every so often to fling poop?
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.

Yes the one share covered with the blood of jews when the company was liquadated for a cool 1.5 mil in 1951. Pretty nice chunk 'o cash for one share eh?

His buisness partner Thyssen (writer of the book "I Paid Hitler") was striaght up arrested under the Trading With the Enemy Act in 1942.

"a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence.

The bush legacy is funded by nazi sympathizers, how could you not as an american be concerned with the embracing of the nazi scientist refugees and their rise to power in the GOP in the 50's and the embracing of the racist southern dixiecrats in the 60's.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.

Yes the one share covered with the blood of jews when the company was liquadated for a cool 1.5 mil in 1951. Pretty nice chunk 'o cash for one share eh?

His buisness partner Thyssen (writer of the book "I Paid Hitler") was striaght up arrested under the Trading With the Enemy Act in 1942.

"a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence.

If he was arrested then how could he be managing a steel mill in Auschwitz?

 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.


The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.

two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill

I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.

The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.

Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.


You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?

They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.

Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.

Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.

I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.


Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):

A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.

B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.

You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.

I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.

We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Maybe TLC means that those on the left shouldn't have been isolationists and should have made a couple bucks off of the Nazis like grandpappy Bush did?
And like Kennedy's father did, and like many people with money did back in the 30s.

But hey. Let's focus on some tenuous financial connections to make even further exaggerated and hyperbolic claims. Anything to rant about Bush, eh? :roll:

We all know about Union Bank having their assets seized for colluding with the Nazis before and during WWII.

Do you have any proof of your claim chicken?
Here

and

Here

Don't let the facts hit you in the head on the way out, please.

Thanks for two of the most damning articles I've seen on the Bushnazis.
Yeah, Prescott Bush's single share (out of 4000) in UBC is certainly damning...to every delusional left-wing tool in the US.

All of the partners had one share and the rest were owned by the Harrimans. Are you saying aiding the Nazis was OK as long as you only owned one share of the U.S. bank that helped them? And KNOWINGLY as well?

 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..


Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.

The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm

30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.

absoloute power corrupts absoloutlety, america has not had to learn how hard that lesson is yet being a superpower.

A lot of this country see it coming though and speak out. I do not think the average america is a goosestepper but the complacency is intolerable...

The mindset america has sunk into on a lot of issues would be better suited for the 1930 then 2005.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome


Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):

A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.

B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.

You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.

I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.

We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.

You should really save that for the people you support. Tell them the power of words like WMD and terrorist ties.

The ONLY greater good we can accomplish is to indict Bush and his criminal cabal from Texas.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: BBond
All of the partners had one share and the rest were owned by the Harrimans. Are you saying aiding the Nazis was OK as long as you only owned one share of the U.S. bank that helped them? And KNOWINGLY as well?
THere's no real point in discussing this since you obviously want to remain superficial about it to make a sound-byte, and ignore the actual facts.

The facts are there in the articles I linked. Anyone who wants can read them and see if they agree with such proclamations as "The Bush fortune was made from the Nazis." or "The Bushies supported the Nazi war machine." A few will of course. Others with a modicum of sense and comprehension will look at such pronouncements as more hyperbole from the loonie left, the same loonie left that will ask you why anyone should care about Kerry's war records from 30 years ago but will gladly reach back over 60 years ago to take a slap at Bush. I love their hypocrisy. It's so...consistent.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..


Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.

The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm

30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.

You said this ""a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence. "

Either he was managing or not. Sounds like you are telling a lie.

 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
the bush fortune was made from nothing less then the 1.5 millon he got from 1 stock of a company found to be complacent and bankrolled to a large degree by the third reich, no less then that TLC.

the owner freakin was arrested and wrote a book called:"I Paid Hitler" admitting just this.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..


Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.

The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm

30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.

You said this ""a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence. "

Either he was managing or not. Sounds like you are telling a lie.



take it up with dutch intellegence in ww2, I was not alive, they wrote it not me dude, sorry.

The cool 1.5 mil in 1951 blood money is the thing that sets off alarms for me though.

I like money just like the next guy but if I had that stock and I knew where the cash came from I would have donated it to jewish familys or something...wtf?

That is a major ethics issue in my eyes, and that money is still there! (in some form of investment or another bankrolling our presidents family no less.)
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
As stated in the post his buisness partner and close friend was the one who wrote the book and was arrested in 42 under the trading with the enemy act..


Connect the dots...after the war we let in a lot of the former nazi regime were embraced scarily enough by the gop.

The GOP immediatly started the mc carthy thing and went from being a party of social justices to embracing the racist whites....hmmmm

30 or so years later reagan is laying wreaths at SS guard monuments during his term using the language and total propaganda disimformation campaigns of goebbels which the gop still uses to fear america into warmongering.

You said this ""a portion of the slave labor force in Poland (Auschwitz prison camp's steel mill) was 'managed by Prescott Bush'" according to Dutch intelligence. "

Either he was managing or not. Sounds like you are telling a lie.



take it up with dutch intellegence in ww2, I was not alive, they wrote it not me dude, sorry.

The cool 1.5 mil in 1951 blood money is the thing that sets off alarms for me though.

I like money just like the next guy but if I had that stock and I knew where the cash came from I would have donated it to jewish familys or something...wtf?

That is a major ethics issue in my eyes.

If you are going to say something I would have hoped you had enough brain power to look at it and determine is the crap you got off some anti-bush website makes sense. It doesnt have to be entirely correct at thispoint but at least make sense.

Hiding behind the "I dunno because I can't think" argument is weak.

And we are the sheeple?
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
are you saying dutch's resistance intellegence are liars? Who would you trust? prescott who is buddy buddy with the biggest corporations found to be working with the reich or the european resistance?

Go grab a book about this, make your own judgements, neither of us were alive but court records show when the money was being made prescott was complacent to some degree or another. Thyssen was as slimey of a best friend to prescott's family as the bin ladens are to the current one..

?Bush - Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951? - Federal Documents

Although the additional seizures under the Trading with the Enemy Act did not take place until after the war, documents from The National Archives and Library of Congress confirm that Bush and his partners continued their Nazi dealings unabated. These activities included a financial relationship with the German city of Hanover and several industrial concerns. They went undetected by investigators until after World War Two.
 
Jun 8, 2005
50
0
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Stratago
Originally posted by: cwjerome
The Dems are in a bad way right now, and if anyone decides to take off the blinders, they'll see that the extreme strategy of over-hyping things only backfires and makes them look like unhinged hacks. Every nazi reference, every gulag or Hitler or dumbsh*t conspiratorial paranioa outburst, is another nail in the coffin.


The right has no business talking about over-hyping things. They take one or two quotes from the opposing view put them greatly out of context and make false conclusions from them.

two examples off the top of my head.
ex1 the OP
ex2 Ward Churchill

I doubt highly that the OPer even considered reading the actual speech and the article quoted missed the point by miles.
The same thing happened with Churchill the Republicans took one quote from the essay and blew it way out of proportion.

The left lays down a point, the right manipulates the information to their gain. I'm going to fvcking say it again NAZIS.

Edit: If you throw sh1t at me i'm going to thow back.


You say dopey things like "people didn't read the whole speech" or "they took one quote from an essay" as if that somehow makes those things alright. The fact is the MEANING of those excerpts doesn't change... they ARE in context. Your two example are meaningless because they aren't manipulated. Explain to me how either example were pulled "out of context." How was the point missed by miles?

They weren't... you're just butthurt over the fact that it pissed people off, so you have to blame the dastardly Right for "swindling the poor stupid masses." It never occurrs to you that those comments are simply idiotic because that would make a person like you idiotic for believing them.

Boo-hoo, blame the Right for everytime a stupid sucker on the Left says something dumb. Calling me (or the Right) Nazi again is a gem... you'll never know just how well you prove my point about the unhinged Left. You people are swirling down the toilet bowl and you don't have the balls to swallow your pride and get real.

Here is what i got out of the speech
The US is a leader in human rights and by holding suspected terrorists and granting them no rights, none at all, we are damaging our appeal to the rest of the world.
The fact that we have secret prison camps all around the world and are holding people there indefinately without any rights sounds a lot more like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than the US.
Finally the way that he related the Japanese interment camps to Gitmo is that both incidents are and will be embarassing points in our history.

I don't see anyware in the speech saying
Mr. Durbin also likened the treatment of terror suspects at the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to authorize the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
or
The Senate's No. 2 Democrat has compared the U.S. military's treatment of a suspected al Qaeda terrorist at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay with the regimes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot, three of history's most heinous dictators, whose regimes killed millions.


Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):

A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.

B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.

You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.

I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.

We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.

I do not think aluding to past events is at all bogus. We have to remember our history and learn from it. In the speech, Durbin complains about how the administration averted the checks and ballace system by saying fvck you congress we do what we want. Anything starting with "the administration unilaterally" doesn't really fly in my books. The administration seems to be hunting for power and I believe they are gaining too much of it.
 
Jun 8, 2005
50
0
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
[


Here's MY point (and the point of the OP I think):

A) Saying the Gitmo situation will be a blotch on our history is one thing. But by also alluding to Japansese internment camps, he's making a bogus connection, because he's implying that the two are similar in other ways. It's an irresponsible comparison which negates his original point.

B) Saying the US isn't living up to its high ideals is one thing. But by also referencing Nazi and Soviets, he's making a bogus connection, because the issues aren't even close to what the Nazi and Soviets did. It's an irresponsible connection which negates his original point.

You have to understand that words having meaning. Make your arguments, but do so without outrageous comparisons and implying ridiculous connections, otherwise whatever point you're trying to make is lost in the bullsh*t. That's what I'm talking about when I say the Left is poisoning the well. Just as a little bit of poison destroys the valuable water, a little bit of wild-eyed nonsense destroys a valuable message.

I personally think Gitmo and the issues surrounding it has been a mistake for the Bush administration. But a rational dialogue that might actually help fix things is impossible with the nutty left engaged in crazed hyperbole and exagerration.

We all know Libs tend to be emotional but they have to set their anger and hate for Bush aside for the greater good. They might actually discover that such a strategy just may work better politically for them than the usual maniacal rhetoric.

Here's MY point:

A)We all know Libs tend to be emotional...

B)You have to understand that words having meaning. Saying the US isn't living up to what the Nazi and Soviets did... ...is poisoning the well.