Minimum Wage Can Stand Some Maximizing...

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dissipate

Diamond Member
Jan 17, 2004
6,815
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie

When you look at the actual (usually physical) productivity of a minimum wage employee, they are producing enough wealth in a 40 hour week that there is no reason they should have to work more; there is no market solution to this, but as I've mentioned there may not be a reasonable regulatory or other solution, either, at least under the umbrella of a free-market-economy-with-tinkering.

Overtime laws are a joke. I've worked minimum wage before and I could never get many hours because of the stupid @ss overtime laws.
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Why should I be forced to pay for other peoples food stamps, section 8, health care, etc., instead of the person employing them, making money off of them. They way I see it, if you can't afford to pay people living wages, your business simply isn't profitable, so you have to make it profitable. My tax dollars shouldn't be used to keep your business profitable while keeping your employees earning 2/3 of the poverty rate.
Beg the question much?

Just stating the facts, and my feelings about them. Do you care to refute them?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Lifted
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Why should I be forced to pay for other peoples food stamps, section 8, health care, etc., instead of the person employing them, making money off of them. They way I see it, if you can't afford to pay people living wages, your business simply isn't profitable, so you have to make it profitable. My tax dollars shouldn't be used to keep your business profitable while keeping your employees earning 2/3 of the poverty rate.
Beg the question much?
Just stating the facts, and my feelings about them. Do you care to refute them?
Just your poor logic: Text
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Why should I be forced to pay for other peoples food stamps, section 8, health care, etc., instead of the person employing them, making money off of them. They way I see it, if you can't afford to pay people living wages, your business simply isn't profitable, so you have to make it profitable. My tax dollars shouldn't be used to keep your business profitable while keeping your employees earning 2/3 of the poverty rate.
Beg the question much?
Just stating the facts, and my feelings about them. Do you care to refute them?
Just your poor logic: Text

I'm glad to see you learned a new phrase for the day, and are all too excited to use it and show everyone else how you found it, but the fact that my challenging you to expose the questionable facts in my post led only to you repeating youself leads me to belive you simply posted that thinking it was clever. It wasn't. Your post actually makes no sense as I was simply stating an opinion, but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you simply didn't know what the phrase meant, and I appear to be correct in that assumption.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Lifted
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Why should I be forced to pay for other peoples food stamps, section 8, health care, etc., instead of the person employing them, making money off of them. They way I see it, if you can't afford to pay people living wages, your business simply isn't profitable, so you have to make it profitable. My tax dollars shouldn't be used to keep your business profitable while keeping your employees earning 2/3 of the poverty rate.
Beg the question much?
Just stating the facts, and my feelings about them. Do you care to refute them?
Just your poor logic: Text

I'm glad to see you learned a new phrase for the day, and are all too excited to use it and show everyone else how you found it, but the fact that my challenging you to expose the questionable facts in my post led only to you repeating youself leads me to belive you simply posted that thinking it was clever. It wasn't. Your post actually makes no sense as I was simply stating an opinion, but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you simply didn't know what the phrase meant, and I appear to be correct in that assumption.
Are you that ignorant? It seems so, because your "facts," "opinions," and arguments are like a dog chasing its tail. Next, you'll probably start spouting off about some "right" that everyone has to eat their cake and have it too.

BTW, nice way of covering up that YOU just found what "begging the question" means... :roll:
 

Lifted

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2004
5,748
2
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lifted
Why should I be forced to pay for other peoples food stamps, section 8, health care, etc., instead of the person employing them, making money off of them. They way I see it, if you can't afford to pay people living wages, your business simply isn't profitable, so you have to make it profitable. My tax dollars shouldn't be used to keep your business profitable while keeping your employees earning 2/3 of the poverty rate.
Beg the question much?
Just stating the facts, and my feelings about them. Do you care to refute them?
Just your poor logic: Text

I'm glad to see you learned a new phrase for the day, and are all too excited to use it and show everyone else how you found it, but the fact that my challenging you to expose the questionable facts in my post led only to you repeating youself leads me to belive you simply posted that thinking it was clever. It wasn't. Your post actually makes no sense as I was simply stating an opinion, but I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you simply didn't know what the phrase meant, and I appear to be correct in that assumption.
Are you that ignorant? It seems so, because your "facts," "opinions," and arguments are like a dog chasing its tail. Next, you'll probably start spouting off about some "right" that everyone has to eat their cake and have it too.

BTW, nice way of covering up that YOU just found what "begging the question" means... :roll:

:roll:

I'm rubber, you're glue...
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Stunt
No matter what you raise minimum wage to, people will continue to be paid and work for less. A minimum wage does nothing more than encourage employers to pay the minimum and not price labour relative to skills and demand. Of course the fiscal left feels great when minimum wage is raised; unfortunately it has little to no effect on real wages.

I'm waiting for someone with actual knowledge of what minimum wages do to step in here. It's not a particularly good policy tool, but most of the anti-minimum-wage crowd has entirely the wrong reasons for supporting it.

An efficient solution would separate labour markets so that students, second-income-earners, and sole-providers did not compete for jobs, but this is completely unrealistic, unfair, and impractical.

A less efficient, but still 'better' solution would recognize that most minimum wage earners (unlike most highly paid individuals) are directly productive; i.e. they have a measurable output. Pay could then be based on a percentage of actual productivity, rather than a competitive market with unequal players and unequal 'freedom of choice'. This one won't happen either.

The fact is that under a competitive market, it doens't matter how high productivity is for unskilled labour; if the jobs have alternative employees in the youth and second-income segment, they will never have to pay what any of us would consider a 'living wage', regardless of how you define that.

Of course not; if you're doing the same work as a teenager you merit the same pay. But there is a way around that; without school, you're more than free to work well over 40 hours a week.

When you look at the actual (usually physical) productivity of a minimum wage employee, they are producing enough wealth in a 40 hour week that there is no reason they should have to work more; there is no]/i] market solution to this, but as I've mentioned there may not be a reasonable regulatory or other solution, either, at least under the umbrella of a free-market-economy-with-tinkering.


So where exactly do you quantify the productivity of mininum wage workers?
 

erwos

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2005
4,778
0
76
I just want to point out that I'm reasonably familiar with the Card and Krueger study (we dissected it in labor economics), and that it's not exactly bullet-proof evidence of "minimum wage increases don't affect unemployment". For one thing, their sample was biased, in that it didn't include McDonald's (who refused to give them any information). Second, I don't believe they did a great job of controlling/compensating for external factors - eg , other factors entirely might have caused PA to have a particularly bad year, and NJ have a particularly good one.

Interestingly, the end result of the paper (from what I recall) was that prices rose slightly, and profits went down - which leads to higher inflation and less investment in the state over the long-term (which, presumably, is going to cause increased unemployment). This is, of course, not exactly a startling revelation, although I believe C&K were expecting more unemployment (like everyone else).

In summary, there's no quick and easy long-term fix, and passing off a minimum wage increase as one is, at best, misleading, and, at worst, an outright falsehood.

-Erwos (with a BSc in Econ and CS)
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Stunt
No matter what you raise minimum wage to, people will continue to be paid and work for less. A minimum wage does nothing more than encourage employers to pay the minimum and not price labour relative to skills and demand. Of course the fiscal left feels great when minimum wage is raised; unfortunately it has little to no effect on real wages.
These privileged college kids who've never spent a day working in the private sector in their entire lives are simply never going to understand this. They just require that the rest of us pay for the guilt they suffer as a result of their affluent upbringing.

Privaleged college kids?

Stunt is one of those;)

I love that only people who stopped after econ 101 think they know exactly how the world works.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: erwos
I just want to point out that I'm reasonably familiar with the Card and Krueger study (we dissected it in labor economics), and that it's not exactly bullet-proof evidence of "minimum wage increases don't affect unemployment". For one thing, their sample was biased, in that it didn't include McDonald's (who refused to give them any information). Second, I don't believe they did a great job of controlling/compensating for external factors - eg , other factors entirely might have caused PA to have a particularly bad year, and NJ have a particularly good one.

Interestingly, the end result of the paper (from what I recall) was that prices rose slightly, and profits went down - which leads to higher inflation and less investment in the state over the long-term (which, presumably, is going to cause increased unemployment). This is, of course, not exactly a startling revelation, although I believe C&K were expecting more unemployment (like everyone else).

In summary, there's no quick and easy long-term fix, and passing off a minimum wage increase as one is, at best, misleading, and, at worst, an outright falsehood.

-Erwos (with a BSc in Econ and CS)

Do you think the guy with a minimum wage job cares much if he loses his job? I mean it's not like he has a "career", he doesn't even have a living wage.

We have a goverment printing/spending money like there is no tomorrow and your worried about the 1/10 of 1% infaltion that MIGHT be caused by raising minimum wage?

:roll:
 

erwos

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2005
4,778
0
76
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
We have a goverment printing/spending money like there is no tomorrow and your worried about the 1/10 of 1% infaltion that MIGHT be caused by raising minimum wage?
Would you care to share your credentials in the economics field with the rest of us? I don't really need some uneducated twit (judging from your immaturity and lack of knowledge) lecturing me on macro and labor economics. This is, of course, ignoring your obvious bias against the current administration (judging from your sig), which doesn't really make me think your arguments are even based on rationality or logic.

(I got my degree from U of MD. We've got a pretty good program over there, including a few Nobel prize winners. My primary focus was banking, finance, and labor, plus quite a lot of econometrics. Your turn.)

As for your assertion that inflation would rise .1% on the proposed minimum wage raise, I'd like to see some hard statistics for that. I made no such claims as to exactly how much inflation would go up, though I personally suspect it would be more than that. Certainly, if you tied minimum wage to cost of living, you'd expect to see some kind of feedback effect (high inflation -> higher minimum wage -> higher inflation).

-Erwos
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
1
0
Obviosly none of you guys have ever had to LIVE and support a family working retail..

Min wage is too low to even live alone here in texas.

it needs to be rasied as long as the rest of the econony raises with inflation so does min wage..
and if you guys really think that this only helps college/HS kids you really need to get out from mommie and daddies roof..
there is a real world out there and real people and families still depend on fathers and mothers that make min wage..

and they arnt making it..

if anything cuts should be made to pay at exec levels.. who the hell gave these guys the permissions to give themselves 1 million dollar a year bonus's etc..

Im sick of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer..
this goverment is as corrupt as they come..
and the system doesnt work.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
So because I went to college, have a job and don't have an economics degree; my view on minimum wage is somehow not valid?

Minimum wage does help some, but I will garantee there are many people are paid below minimum wage and there's absolutely nothing you can do to fix that. This set wage is also abused in many ways; first employers will use this as a guideline for low demand jobs (reducing the person's pay) and secondly employers can pay this wage no matter cost of living in the city or in rural areas. Does minimum wage provide enough in the country; maybe. Does it provide enough in the city; probably not. The costs associated with living will never be fully understood; so why try to set a minimum wage which describes this?

For your reference, in Canada minimum wage earners represent less than 5% of the workforce. Employers are already paying over and above minimum wage; all this politics is virtually for nothing.

Time for people to be realistic as to what minimum wage is, and not fool themselves into thinking they are making people better off.
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: Stunt
So because I went to college, have a job and don't have an economics degree; my view on minimum wage is somehow not valid?

Minimum wage does help some, but I will garantee there are many people are paid below minimum wage and there's absolutely nothing you can do to fix that. This set wage is also abused in many ways; first employers will use this as a guideline for low demand jobs (reducing the person's pay) and secondly employers can pay this wage no matter cost of living in the city or in rural areas. Does minimum wage provide enough in the country; maybe. Does it provide enough in the city; probably not. The costs associated with living will never be fully understood; so why try to set a minimum wage which describes this?

For your reference, in Canada minimum wage earners represent less than 5% of the workforce. Employers are already paying over and above minimum wage; all this politics is virtually for nothing.

Time for people to be realistic as to what minimum wage is, and not fool themselves into thinking they are making people better off.
Well, your opinion is off-base simply because it does not adequaltely account for reality; having education in economics is not really part of the problem, that was simply an observation; the world (and especially the economy) never looks as simple as right after you finish up first-year micro, and people who stop there are more likely to hold economic positions that reflect this.

I don't think minimum wage in Canada is nearly as much an issue as in the US; in fact it does mostly affect students here, and realistically for young workers, workplace safety and education are more important than pay. I haven't worked for minimum wage since I was 15.

Add a few years of outsourcing - an area in which we seem to trail the US slightly - and perhaps the minimum wage and associated issues will be more relevant here.
 

acole1

Golden Member
Sep 28, 2005
1,543
0
0
Minimum wage up = UNEMPLOYMENT RATE UP!!!!

You can't force employers to fork over more money and NOT fire workers!! There is only so much money in the economy without inflation... I would think an economist would realize that. In every other country where minimum wage is high, unemployment is also high.

France, for example, has a minimum wage that compares to about $10/hr here and their unemployment is 10%... 2x our's.

Higher minimum wage means more minimum-wage-earners out of work. There is only so much wealth that can be shared.

In the end you don't help the current minimum wage earners... you hurt them by getting them laid off. Then how much do they make, eh?

Pick your poison...
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Well, your opinion is off-base simply because it does not adequaltely account for reality; having education in economics is not really part of the problem, that was simply an observation; the world (and especially the economy) never looks as simple as right after you finish up first-year micro, and people who stop there are more likely to hold economic positions that reflect this.

I don't think minimum wage in Canada is nearly as much an issue as in the US; in fact it does mostly affect students here, and realistically for young workers, workplace safety and education are more important than pay. I haven't worked for minimum wage since I was 15.

Add a few years of outsourcing - an area in which we seem to trail the US slightly - and perhaps the minimum wage and associated issues will be more relevant here.
Actually we are ahead of the US on outsourcing. We are far more open to dealing with China and India than the US is; relatively speaking.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: acole1
Minimum wage up = UNEMPLOYMENT RATE UP!!!!

Higher minimum wage means more minimum-wage-earners out of work.

There is only so much wealth that can be shared.

In the end you don't help the current minimum wage earners... you hurt them by getting them laid off. Then how much do they make, eh?

Pick your poison...

Ah thank you for pointing out trickle down means sh!t.

If a business is intent on keeping it's employees in the dirt then they do not deserve to be in business, period.

What do YOU want, employees living in mud huts on the plantation again???
 

HombrePequeno

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2001
4,657
0
0
Originally posted by: acole1
Minimum wage up = UNEMPLOYMENT RATE UP!!!!

You can't force employers to fork over more money and NOT fire workers!! There is only so much money in the economy without inflation... I would think an economist would realize that. In every other country where minimum wage is high, unemployment is also high.

France, for example, has a minimum wage that compares to about $10/hr here and their unemployment is 10%... 2x our's.

Higher minimum wage means more minimum-wage-earners out of work. There is only so much wealth that can be shared.

In the end you don't help the current minimum wage earners... you hurt them by getting them laid off. Then how much do they make, eh?

Pick your poison...

There are a few more things that add to France's unemployment than just a high minimum wage. Minimum wage is part of it but they also have a fairly static labor market because of rigid rules on hiring/firing people (which I'm sure has helped spur resentment in immigrants to the country like Muslims). They also have fairly generous unemployment benefits and their attitude for work is slightly different than ours. Whereas we try to keep up with the Jones by working our arses off, most French see the value in freetime.

So yes, the higher minimum wage is part of it, but not the whole picture. Also if you want to get technical, raising minimum wage would increase the natural rate of unemployment, not necessarily the current unemployment.

I'd like to contribute more to this thread but seeing as how I've only gotten up to Intermediate Macro, I'd prefer to let people a little more knowledgable than me argue about this one.

This is a very interesting thread so far, aside from a few trolls that don't know what they're talking about.
 

erwos

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2005
4,778
0
76
Originally posted by: Stunt
So because I went to college, have a job and don't have an economics degree; my view on minimum wage is somehow not valid?
You summarize my position correctly. I wouldn't care about opinions on proper software engineering from someone with no credentials in the field, so why should I take economics advice from someone like that? The fact that you can balance your checkbook, while laudable, does not translate to economics acumen.

This isn't meant as a personal attack, only clarification of my position that people ought to think twice about their knowledge of the field.

-Erwos
 

LukeMan

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,380
0
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Maybe I've just been in Alaska too long. Minimum wage here is $7.25/hr. If I put an ad in the paper for $7.25 I'd receive exactly ZERO responses. At $9/hr I might get some high school kids or a college student looking for some extra cash.

It's all dependent upon where you live. In Iowa there are many places that only pay $5.15 an hour. My 14 year old sister works at Chic Filet and gets $5.15 an hour. My first job(1999) I worked at the movie theater and made $5.15(it did have it's perks though, free tickets). Many jobs I looked into back in '99 only paid $5.15 also. There has been slight increases to some of the jobs in the area, but there is still many minimum wage paying jobs here.
 

smut

Golden Member
Dec 4, 2005
1,269
0
71
I vote for a raise. I dont care what the politics are. Cost of living goes up every year. You can at least raise the minumum wage up AFTER 7 YEARS, COME ON NOW!
 

smut

Golden Member
Dec 4, 2005
1,269
0
71
Originally posted by: BoberFett
As an employer, why would you bother keeping a minimum wage employee after minimum wage increases?

Minimum wage for illegals never goes up.

Some jobs "illegals" cant perform. I can understand your point in some employment fields but not all.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: smut
I vote for a raise. I dont care what the politics are. Cost of living goes up every year. You can at least raise the minumum wage up AFTER 7 YEARS, COME ON NOW!
Wages have been increasing in the US without the minimum wage.
Cost of living doesn't relate to minimum wage.
Minimum wage has little to no effect on wages.
 

HomeAppraiser

Platinum Member
Aug 17, 2005
2,562
1
0
Your forgetting the Earned Income Credit. If you are working full time at minimum and support a kid or two you will get back $4,000 to $6,000 when you file your taxes assuming standard payroll withholding. At that level you can also get WIC foods and state health care for your kids. The only thing missing is pride.

So in reality the government (your tax dollars) are subsidizing a cheap workforce for big business.
 

smut

Golden Member
Dec 4, 2005
1,269
0
71
Minimum wage doesnt have an effect on wages? They both have wages in the words, to say it has NO effect at all is ludicrous.

Alot of ppl work minimum wage. That extra money every week multiplied by the year is certainly more then nothing right?