OptimumSlinky
Senior member
- Nov 3, 2009
- 345
- 1
- 76
Infantry combat in BF3 is the best out of the entire BF series. The battlelog was actually really good, pretty much making a battlefield facebook with stats and everything (something that MW3 charges for).
Respectfully, just because infantry combat in BF3 is better than in any BF before it doesn't really say much; it is still clunkier and more awkward than its peers and competitors.
And I don't mind the Battlelog system. And I agree it should be free (and it is with MW3; the Elite premium gets you other stuff beyond stat tracking). But it's hardly revolutionary, as Bungie.net has had stat tracking and the whole shebang as far back as Halo 3 (so, 2007).
And frankly, all of the stat tracking and such could have easily been integrated into the in-game UI and would have made it polished and cohesive. Instead it just feels like a last-minute add on that was thrown in to compete with COD Elite.
I guess I want Battlefield to stop trying to out-COD MW, and instead just focus on being the most awesome BF experience ever. I don't feel like BF3 does this. Flashy graphics and jet planes aside, it feels like a step back in almost every way to BC2 to me, and that's sad.
EDIT: To return to topic, I'm not going to write Warfighter off. MOH2010 did a lot of things right in terms of mood and style (I remember the part where you kick away the booby-trapped body before it blows just made my jaw drop), and I think with some fresh focus Warfighter could be badass. But it will have to be very special to warrant $60, especially in an age that doesn't seem to believe in demos.
Last edited:
