I act like saying we are doing fine when we have a trillion dollar deficit is a stupid thing to say, period.
For someone worried about someone deflecting to Trump when the thread is about Waters is a bad thing you certainly deflected from Trump's deficit to Obama's deficit pretty quickly, don't you think? And that deflection is into a straw man characterization of my argument: that my commenting on the complete absurdity that we are doing fine when we are running trillion dollar deficits somehow means I think large deficits are unique to Trump. That is equally stupid, because I am fully aware of our deficit history. That is two stupid strikes against you, but not surprising because you are a stupid man (boy-child).
Third, your "nearly $10 trillion" number is
actually nearly $9 trillion, even using a flawed metric (see
this article for an explanation, if you can manage to comprehend it) that saddles Obama with the 2009 deficit, much of which is a result of the budget Bush set for 2009. Three stupid strikes for you. You're out.
But wait, there's more! Trump's deficits are actually well over $1 trillion per year as you can also see in the second link above. So no, it is not an improvement. Four strikes. You're going to have to play in a sissy-leftist-everyone-wins-league now.
When discussing deficits you have to understand that deficits can be good and they can be bad. The way to determine which parts of the deficit are good vs. which parts are bad, you need to be able to understand a super technical term: ROI. Now I know this is very complicated but there are only three letters there which is less than your number of strikes so I believe in you. You can do it. The parts of the deficit that produce a positive ROI are good, and the parts that produce a negative ROI are bad. Do you think you can keep those two things straight? Most conservatives can't but you aren't a conservative, right? Right? This is how we can determine that a large portion of Trump's deficits are bad, because they are producing a negative ROI, while most of Obama's produced a positive ROI.
Now please, ignore everything I have posted here and all the posts in that old thread informing you why you sound stupid and tell us how you think that because revenues are up it means Trump's deficits are producing a positive ROI. Thanks.