Max Payne 3 PC to have "gloriously increased resolution and graphical detail"

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Want.

And no, it wasn't just bullet time, it was the narrative and story telling that really made Max Payne a memorable experience that is all too rare in PC gaming.

Especially the 2nd one.

The game beginning and opening at it's hopeless tragic ending scenes and then the game play itself telling the story of the days prior leading up to that climax, another Max Payne touch.

This is what games used to be like before cheap ass Call of Duty and Rock Band type "easy profit" games and their 100 clones and sequels destroyed the market.

I also distinctly remember playing the early Splinter Cell, No One Lives Forever, and I think maybe Deus Ex and System Shock 2 around the same era.

I miss those days of quality games that weren't just a new texture pack for the 15th sequel with $1000 worth of zero day DLC every 3 months.
 
Last edited:

Martimus

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2007
4,488
152
106
Let's be honest, the game was decent for it's time, the whole bullet time was a big deal then in a gimmicky sort of way. But if you recall, playing through the campaign got monotonous pretty fast--shoot a room full of enemies that keep coming at you, watch some cut scenes, shoot another room full of enemies, watch another cut scene, repeat.

To say that they should make another game like Max Payne 1 and 2 means you have no foresight or understanding of the evolution of video games, so I hope for your own sake, don't ever consider a career in game design.

I played Max Payne years after it was released. I played and finished Max Payne 2 maybe a year ago, and they were still probably the best shooter games I had played at that point ( and probably the best still, since the newer shooters are boring to me. )

I completely disagree witb your assessment of the games. They were very good and the story was one of the best for a shooter ever.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
I'll believe it when I see it. Rock Star is notorious for making the absolute worst trashy console ports of all time, GTA IV is a prime example. The coding is so poor its hilarious.

LA Noise isn't much different. Like I said, i'll believe it when it happens. :rolleyes:
 

BD231

Lifer
Feb 26, 2001
10,568
138
106
You know this title is going to suck graphically if its made by rockstar.
 

busydude

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2010
8,793
5
76
R* released the minimum/recommended PC requirements..


Operating System:
Windows 7 32/64 Service Pack 1, Windows Vista 32/64 Service Pack 2, Windows XP 32/64 Service Pack 3
Processor:
Intel Dual Core 2.4 GHZ - i7 3930K 6 Core x 3.06 GHZ / AMD Dual Core 2.6 GHZ – FX8150 8 Core x 3.6 GHZ
RAM:
2GB – 16GB
Video Card:
NVIDIA® 8600 GT 512MB VRAM – NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 680 2GB VRAM / Radeon HD 3400 512MB VRAM – Radeon HD 7970 3GB VRAM
Sound Card:
100% Direct X 9.0 compatible – Direct X 9.0 compatible supporting Dolby Digital Live
HDD Space:
35 GB

WTF.. 35GB.. D: hope it has some good content.. to live up to its massive size.
 

Dankk

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2008
5,558
25
91
If we take those Minimum-Maximum system requirements that Rockstar posted and properly split them up, they look like this:

Minimum:
  • Intel Dual Core 2.4 GHZ or AMD Dual Core 2.6 GHZ
  • 2GB RAM
  • NVIDIA® 8600 GT 512MB or Radeon HD 3400 512MB
  • 35 GB HDD space

Recommended (or Optimal):
  • i7 3930K 6 Core x 3.06 GHZ or FX8150 8 Core x 3.6 GHZ
  • 16GB RAM
  • NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 680 2GB or Radeon HD 7970 3GB
  • 35 GB HDD space

If true, then those "Recommended" system requirements are batshit insane. 16GB of memory? Seriously? And a 2GB GTX 680, which are currently possessed only by the tiniest fraction of PC gaming enthusiasts? All for a console port?

Well, I guess I should give R* a little more credit... they say the PC version of Max Payne 3 is being built from the ground up, rather than being directly ported. I hope it looks and runs damn well, especially for 35GB of hard drive space.

I'm still skeptical though. After the clusterfuck that was GTA4, I'm still not entirely sure if I can trust Rockstar to release a well-optimized game. But we'll see. I won't be buying it anywawy because 1) $60 is a bit out of my price range, and 2) I want to play Max Payne 1 & 2 first.
 

VashHT

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2007
3,067
875
136
LOL wow and I thought 12Gb was a lot. I want to see what graphics options they have, the gap between min and recommended is huge.
 

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
LOL wow and I thought 12Gb was a lot. I want to see what graphics options they have, the gap between min and recommended is huge.

I'm not worried. Metro 2033 also had ridiculous optimal specs, which the actual retail game never even came close to requiring, ie 8GB of ram..
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,716
417
126
tbqhwy.com
also a 35 GB install is larger then anything I can think of, Rage was under 20 IIRC and WoW is li23 with all the xpacs
 

VashHT

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2007
3,067
875
136
I'm not worried. Metro 2033 also had ridiculous optimal specs, which the actual retail game never even came close to requiring, ie 8GB of ram..

Yeah these specs seem ridiculously inflated, unless they have some broken option like ubersampling in witcher 2 I'm sure I'll be able to max it out.
 

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
also a 35 GB install is larger then anything I can think of, Rage was under 20 IIRC and WoW is li23 with all the xpacs

The inflated HDD specs is probably due to multi-language packs....which are usually optional. Installing one language alone will drastically reduce the HDD requirements.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
I think they were just lazy and listed the best available parts (ignoring anything crazy like Intel's extreme edition processors) from both companies.
 

Ichigo

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2005
2,159
0
0
The inflated HDD specs is probably due to multi-language packs....which are usually optional. Installing one language alone will drastically reduce the HDD requirements.

That and maybe huge texture packs. 35GB doesn't necessarily mean anything regarding the content.