• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mattel introduces fat Barbie

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
To have the minimum waist size needed to have functional internal organs, the original Barbie would have to be over seven feet tall. Pass.

Karlie probably isn't too far off.

6'1" 126 lbs, makes Taylor look like a dwarf.

karlie_kloss_and_taylor_swift_by_lowerrider-d700rrr.jpg
 
Looks like she weighs at least 220.

It's well known that Barbie doesn't have a vagina. The real question is, does Fat Barbie have a gunt?

Also, link?

Well, from this post, at least we know that you don't go around weighing people for fun or money. You clearly have no idea what 220 looks like on a woman.
 
Karlie probably isn't too far off.

6'1" 126 lbs, makes Taylor look like a dwarf.

karlie_kloss_and_taylor_swift_by_lowerrider-d700rrr.jpg

what kind of ultratelephoto or wideangle lens are we working with here?

that dude behind Taylor Swift is like 4 feet tall?

the giant girl looks to be photoshopped in...
 
My point was "normal" Barbie is a freakish pituitary case. "Fat" Barbie would certainly be preferable.

My point is that anyone can spout ridiculous pseudoscience to make an needless statement.

She's a cartoon character. Are we going to start body shaming Ragedy Ann too?
 
Back
Top