Chaotic42
Lifer
I said I wouldn't get into this, but what the hell. For those of you willing to buy that 1-1+1-1... is equal to 0.5, without looking it up, what would you think 1+0-1+1+0-1... is equal to?
No cheating.
The answer is 2/3 by the way
I said I wouldn't get into this, but what the hell. For those of you willing to buy that 1-1+1-1... is equal to 0.5, without looking it up, what would you think 1+0-1+1+0-1... is equal to?
No cheating.
The answer is 2/3 by the way
its equal to 0 or -1, depending when you stop the ...
"We don't know so we take the average"
I'm sure they are right, far smarter than I am, but that just feels like "Eh, math, close enough". LOL
Which is my point. The OP depends on 1-1+1-1... being equal to 0.5, which depends on using an alternate definition called a Cesaro summation. The Cesaro sum 1+0-1... is 2/3.
So the sum of 1-1+1-1... is not 0.5. It is undefined for the traditional definition of summation. That's what bothers me about the video.
Can you explain how 1+0-1... is 2/3 and how 1-1+1.. is undefined?
Can you explain how 1+0-1... is 2/3 and how 1-1+1.. is undefined?