i'm under the assumption that the reason he's not discussing it with you is because it's obvious that you do not understand the concept of infinity. at least that is why i stopped discussing it.
Yes that is partly why, but there is a little more to it than that.
Any time you want to talk about the subject I'm ready. You can start by answering all the question of mine that you're pretending do not exist.
Maybe you could start by explaining what it means for a set to "start" and "end."
I'm not pretending your questions don't exist. They just aren't relevant to the heart of the problem for you which is multifold. For one, you seem to have more of a knack for shoving your own point of view down everyone else's throats because you've convinced yourself you're right. That's why earlier I said it's like a politician trying to do math.
You're great at arguing I'll give you that. You could convince a drowning man to have a drink of water. Provided that "man" happened to be an easily impressionable child or teen, maybe.
You're so good at it in fact that the person I see most affected by it is you. So far you've managed to convince yourself that inanimate objects for example rocks have or could have consciousness. You've also managed to convince yourself that you understand infinity when it's very clear that you don't. These are just 2 examples of behavior that is out of touch with reality.
You're also angry and condescending, which only serve the purpose of attempting to make you feel better about yourself by convincing yourself that you are intellectually superior to your peers. But it's an empty, failed attempt. If it worked, and you actually did feel better about yourself, you wouldn't need to keep doing it. The effect would be permanent. If you actually were intellectually superior, and didn't have some sort of inferiority complex, you wouldn't need to be condescending to feel better about yourself. You would treat your peers at least as equals and not as inferior creatures to take your anger out on via insults.
Your anger, like most anger, likely has origins of fear. You fear others will mock your lack of education, understanding of a subject or intellect so you go on the attack first, to protect your fragile ego. You feel if you take the offensive, and establish yourself as the alpha-intellectual, that no one will dominate you in the discussion. Few do, as they give up trying to discuss with you which fuels your anger even further. You are either in your mid to late teenage years, or have the emotional capacity of one who hasn't grown out of that stage yet. A lack of social interaction due to your off putting nature has to this point, and likely will continue to stunt your emotional and intellectual growth.
I called you a politician trying to do math earlier. Is this what you really want to do, become a good debater? Because it doesn't look like you really want to learn math. If you're going to achieve what you want, you need to decide what that is. What is it that you really want to achieve with this discussion? Do you want to learn the math? Do you want to "win" a debate at any cost? Even at the cost of convincing others of a point of view that is not based in reality at all? In other words, are you trying to learn how best to lie to people and convince them or others that your lies are the truth and that the truth isn't true? This is what sociopaths are preoccupied with. They care not about getting to the truth or learning anything, including math. Their goal is to play mind games with people. What they really wan tot learn is how to fool people. It seems like this is what you are really after. Is it? If so I'm sure there are sites devoted to that sort of thing where you might be more among people you can learn from as there don't seem to be many of those around here. You might not like the company you keep for long though as they can be difficult to get along with.
What a turn a math discussion has taken whew.
*mumbles something about nates and levers while hoping I gave someone something to think about*