• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Math peeps explain this to me

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You know what would be absolutely hilarious? If you actually thought you were smart enough to call me dumbass while failing to grasp the concept of infinity even this far into the thread.

A little slow on the uptake there chuckles?

I suppose that's about par for the course - all bark and no bite. You just gonna keep barking or finally run along with your tail between your legs?
 
I can't believe people are still talking about this.

tumblr_mlzxfnHs8z1r8t4b8o1_500.png
 
I suppose that's about par for the course - all bark and no bite. You just gonna keep barking or finally run along with your tail between your legs?

I suppose that's about par for the course. You mistake your opponent for a dog when he's actually a human being. A human being that keeps shining the laser beam around watching you chase it but never having the ability to understand what it is you're chasing. Are you starting to catch on meow? How about meow? No? What about meow? Still not? How slow are you exactly?
 
I suppose that's about par for the course. You mistake your opponent for a dog when he's actually a human being. A human being that keeps shining the laser beam around watching you chase it but never having the ability to understand what it is you're chasing. Are you starting to catch on meow? How about meow? No? What about meow? Still not? How slow are you exactly?

"Yap yap yap yap yap yap" - disappoint 🙄
 
Wouldn't you agree
It's oh so silly
When little Billy
Put his hands over his ears
For years and years
Screaming "lalalala I can't hear you"
So uncouth, so untrue
He did hear you
Oh the hubris of youth

Any time you want to talk about the subject I'm ready. You can start by answering all the question of mine that you're pretending do not exist.

Maybe you could start by explaining what it means for a set to "start" and "end."
 
i'm under the assumption that the reason he's not discussing it with you is because it's obvious that you do not understand the concept of infinity. at least that is why i stopped discussing it.
 
i'm under the assumption that the reason he's not discussing it with you is because it's obvious that you do not understand the concept of infinity. at least that is why i stopped discussing it.

You guys keep saying this despite all of my heretofore unrefuted arguments to the contrary. Your gainsaying is meaningless. Learn some goddamned set theory, for fuck's sake.
 
Take the set of rational number between 1 and 2. It is uncountably infinite. Guess what? It "starts" and 1 and "ends" at 2. You rubes just don't understand that there are bounded infinite sets (infinite sets with least and/or greatest elements) and unbounded infinite sets (infinite sets with no greatest or least elements).

The fact is that you can't grasp the facts about infinite sets that have been well-understood since Cantor.
 
i'm under the assumption that the reason he's not discussing it with you is because it's obvious that you do not understand the concept of infinity. at least that is why i stopped discussing it.

Yes that is partly why, but there is a little more to it than that.

Any time you want to talk about the subject I'm ready. You can start by answering all the question of mine that you're pretending do not exist.

Maybe you could start by explaining what it means for a set to "start" and "end."

I'm not pretending your questions don't exist. They just aren't relevant to the heart of the problem for you which is multifold. For one, you seem to have more of a knack for shoving your own point of view down everyone else's throats because you've convinced yourself you're right. That's why earlier I said it's like a politician trying to do math.

You're great at arguing I'll give you that. You could convince a drowning man to have a drink of water. Provided that "man" happened to be an easily impressionable child or teen, maybe.

You're so good at it in fact that the person I see most affected by it is you. So far you've managed to convince yourself that inanimate objects for example rocks have or could have consciousness. You've also managed to convince yourself that you understand infinity when it's very clear that you don't. These are just 2 examples of behavior that is out of touch with reality.

You're also angry and condescending, which only serve the purpose of attempting to make you feel better about yourself by convincing yourself that you are intellectually superior to your peers. But it's an empty, failed attempt. If it worked, and you actually did feel better about yourself, you wouldn't need to keep doing it. The effect would be permanent. If you actually were intellectually superior, and didn't have some sort of inferiority complex, you wouldn't need to be condescending to feel better about yourself. You would treat your peers at least as equals and not as inferior creatures to take your anger out on via insults.

Your anger, like most anger, likely has origins of fear. You fear others will mock your lack of education, understanding of a subject or intellect so you go on the attack first, to protect your fragile ego. You feel if you take the offensive, and establish yourself as the alpha-intellectual, that no one will dominate you in the discussion. Few do, as they give up trying to discuss with you which fuels your anger even further. You are either in your mid to late teenage years, or have the emotional capacity of one who hasn't grown out of that stage yet. A lack of social interaction due to your off putting nature has to this point, and likely will continue to stunt your emotional and intellectual growth.

I called you a politician trying to do math earlier. Is this what you really want to do, become a good debater? Because it doesn't look like you really want to learn math. If you're going to achieve what you want, you need to decide what that is. What is it that you really want to achieve with this discussion? Do you want to learn the math? Do you want to "win" a debate at any cost? Even at the cost of convincing others of a point of view that is not based in reality at all? In other words, are you trying to learn how best to lie to people and convince them or others that your lies are the truth and that the truth isn't true? This is what sociopaths are preoccupied with. They care not about getting to the truth or learning anything, including math. Their goal is to play mind games with people. What they really wan tot learn is how to fool people. It seems like this is what you are really after. Is it? If so I'm sure there are sites devoted to that sort of thing where you might be more among people you can learn from as there don't seem to be many of those around here. You might not like the company you keep for long though as they can be difficult to get along with.

What a turn a math discussion has taken whew.
*mumbles something about nates and levers while hoping I gave someone something to think about*
 
Yes that is partly why, but there is a little more to it than that.



I'm not pretending your questions don't exist. They just aren't relevant to the heart of the problem for you which is multifold. For one, you seem to have more of a knack for shoving your own point of view down everyone else's throats because you've convinced yourself you're right. That's why earlier I said it's like a politician trying to do math.

You're great at arguing I'll give you that. You could convince a drowning man to have a drink of water. Provided that "man" happened to be an easily impressionable child or teen, maybe.

You're so good at it in fact that the person I see most affected by it is you. So far you've managed to convince yourself that inanimate objects for example rocks have or could have consciousness. You've also managed to convince yourself that you understand infinity when it's very clear that you don't. These are just 2 examples of behavior that is out of touch with reality.

You're also angry and condescending, which only serve the purpose of attempting to make you feel better about yourself by convincing yourself that you are intellectually superior to your peers. But it's an empty, failed attempt. If it worked, and you actually did feel better about yourself, you wouldn't need to keep doing it. The effect would be permanent. If you actually were intellectually superior, and didn't have some sort of inferiority complex, you wouldn't need to be condescending to feel better about yourself. You would treat your peers at least as equals and not as inferior creatures to take your anger out on via insults.

Your anger, like most anger, likely has origins of fear. You fear others will mock your lack of education, understanding of a subject or intellect so you go on the attack first, to protect your fragile ego. You feel if you take the offensive, and establish yourself as the alpha-intellectual, that no one will dominate you in the discussion. Few do, as they give up trying to discuss with you which fuels your anger even further. You are either in your mid to late teenage years, or have the emotional capacity of one who hasn't grown out of that stage yet. A lack of social interaction due to your off putting nature has to this point, and likely will continue to stunt your emotional and intellectual growth.

I called you a politician trying to do math earlier. Is this what you really want to do, become a good debater? Because it doesn't look like you really want to learn math. If you're going to achieve what you want, you need to decide what that is. What is it that you really want to achieve with this discussion? Do you want to learn the math? Do you want to "win" a debate at any cost? Even at the cost of convincing others of a point of view that is not based in reality at all? In other words, are you trying to learn how best to lie to people and convince them or others that your lies are the truth and that the truth isn't true? This is what sociopaths are preoccupied with. They care not about getting to the truth or learning anything, including math. Their goal is to play mind games with people. What they really wan tot learn is how to fool people. It seems like this is what you are really after. Is it? If so I'm sure there are sites devoted to that sort of thing where you might be more among people you can learn from as there don't seem to be many of those around here. You might not like the company you keep for long though as they can be difficult to get along with.

What a turn a math discussion has taken whew.
*mumbles something about nates and levers while hoping I gave someone something to think about*

Wow, Cerpin really got to you. Glad to know you're a keyboard psychologist in addition to a keyboard mathematician.
 
You guys keep saying this despite all of my heretofore unrefuted arguments to the contrary. Your gainsaying is meaningless. Learn some goddamned set theory, for fuck's sake.

you aren't arguing anything. you simply do not understand the concept of infinity. links have been pasted explaining what it is and you just don't get it. there is nothing to argue.

its like someone saying that 2 + 2 doesn't equal 4. if they don't understand why it equals 4 and can't get it, there is nothing to talk about.
 
Wow, Cerpin really got to you. Glad to know you're a keyboard psychologist in addition to a keyboard mathematician.

Oh look the NYC Negative Nancy has rolled out of bed to criticize that which he does not understand. What else is new?

And wow, my post really got to you didn't it? Is that because you see how it applies to you as well? I'm glad you were WOWed by my post, even if it's for the wrong reasons. Maybe you'll make a change. Though I doubt it. I've looked over every post you made in the last year. Only 1 was a positive post. The rest were full of anger, resentment, criticism toward your fellow posters. Take a look at yourself, you might be WOWed at what you find. If you dare. I'll bet you probably won't.

I'm trying to help him. He keeps begging for answers to his questions. Answering those questions will do absolutely nothing to help him, and he doesn't realize that. He has literally closed his mind to learning anything new and is either here to antagonize just like you do, or he is too busy trying to beat everyone over the head with what he thinks he knows instead of learning from anyone.
 
Last edited:
blah blah blah

For all the trouble you went to you could've just returned to the subject of the thread, because I really don't give a shit about anything you just wrote. Rather, it only creates the distinct impression that you're doing whatever you can to avoid it.

Funny, that.
 
For all the trouble you went to you could've just returned to the subject of the thread, because I really don't give a shit about anything you just wrote. Rather, it only creates the distinct impression that you're doing whatever you can to avoid it.

Funny, that.

I can't help you by answering your math questions if you won't accept the answers. You need help in other ways. You can reject that too. Your choice. Funny, that.
 
I can't help you by answering your math questions if you won't accept the answers.
I only accept true answers. That's not so much a problem with me as it is for you, since you have not provided any. You've only offered gainsaying.

You need help in other ways. You can reject that too. Your choice. Funny, that.

Projection is an interesting phenomenon.
 
Last edited:
I said I wouldn't get into this, but what the hell. For those of you willing to buy that 1-1+1-1... is equal to 0.5, without looking it up, what would you think 1+0-1+1+0-1... is equal to?

No cheating.
 
Yeah you can do the shift because there is no multiplication or division.

e.g.

x = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10
y = 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 = -8

x + y will always equal 2, no matter what order you add the numbers in.

Uhm... Why does the second row start with 1 instead of with -1?

To simplify it let's just take 1 - 1 + 1 - 1

If you split it up you get 1 + 1 and -1 - 1, not 1 + 1 and 1 - 1. Or, if you insist on starting the y series with +1, you'd get x = 1 and y = 1 - 1 - 1. After all, that extra 1 has to come from somewhere.

y = -1 - 2 - 3 - 4 = -10

If it was posted in Highly Technical it wouldn't only have gotten laughed at, several would have gotten a vacation due to all the namecalling.
 
I only accept true answers. That's not so much a problem with me as it is for you, since you have not provided any. You've only offered gainsaying.

Projection is an interesting phenomenon.

Actually, that is what you've done. You may think you can win this argument with dishonesty, but you only give yourself away.

What I will do, is ignore your attempts to derail the conversation any further, stop answering you in this thread so others can discuss the original topic and not be subject to your dishonest attempts at self aggrandizement and insults at others to make yourself feel better about your lack of intelligence, education, wit and sanity.
 
When you try to shoehorn a solved result onto an unsolvable problem you get ridiculous answers like this. Dealing with infinite sets as variables and declaring one set to be smaller but equal to larger set is just dumb. This is why better mathematicians laugh at shit like this.
 
Back
Top