MAGA - Trump Accomplishments Thread - Now with links!

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
zinfamous

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,851
31,343
146
SlowSpyder said:
You can tell by how viscous in their attacks that the left is indeed worried at this point that Trump will be a successful president.
Click to expand...

No one wanted Trump to be a shitty president. No one.

It just so happens that the vast majority of people in this country knew that Trump is a woefully incompetent individual, a terrible human, and would very likely make for an awful president. It happens, from what we know over this previous year, that those people are correct.

You, being the dotard that you are, are confusing what was known and what is for what people wanted. Stop being an idiot.
 
S

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
All in all Trump is doing a decent job in pushing his agenda and achieving. AT P&N is in a bubble and won't agree, but he'd easily win again against Hillary today, he likely has MORE pro-Trump voters today than before.
 
Sheik Yerbouti

Sheik Yerbouti

Lifer
Feb 16, 2005
14,079
5,449
136
SlowSpyder said:
All in all Trump is doing a decent job in pushing his agenda and achieving. AT P&N is in a bubble and won't agree, but he'd easily win again against Hillary today, he likely has MORE pro-Trump voters today than before.
Click to expand...
Yes, that completely explains his numbers in polls as to how he's doing. We just need to look at those numbers through slow's eyes and we'll see that the 38% approval rating is a really, really good number, the bigliest of numbers. and the 58% that disapprove of his presidency is solely taken from the people here on this forum, so they don't count.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54
B

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,845
30,615
136
Sheik Yerbouti said:
Yes, that completely explains his numbers in polls as to how he's doing. We just need to look at those numbers through slow's eyes and we'll see that the 38% approval rating is a really, really good number, the bigliest of numbers. and the 58% that disapprove of his presidency is solely taken from the people here on this forum, so they don't count.
Click to expand...

Polls are liberal lies
 
S

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
M

MooseNSquirrel

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2009
2,587
318
126
SlowSpyder said:
It is about the polls. The polls you continue to cling to.
Click to expand...

Nah, this is about a fake narrative that you insist on clinging to and the complete lack of understanding of how polling and projections work.

Net net, a minority of Americans got our sexual assaulter in chief elected, and as of today an even smaller minority support his ego driven incompetence.

#winning
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,285
136
SlowSpyder said:
It is about the polls. The polls you continue to cling to.
Click to expand...

The national polls were highly accurate for the 2016 election, lol. Some state polls were off, but nobody is discussing state polls here. Color me shocked that when it comes to polling and statistics yet again you have no idea what you're talking about.

It's things like this that again bring up the debate in my head between if you're stupid or a liar. At first reading here it just looks like you're Team Dumb but then I remember this has been explained to you repeatedly and you ignore it, which puts me more on Team Liar.
 
S

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
fskimospy said:
The national polls were highly accurate for the 2016 election, lol. Some state polls were off, but nobody is discussing state polls here. Color me shocked that when it comes to polling and statistics yet again you have no idea what you're talking about.

It's things like this that again bring up the debate in my head between if you're stupid or a liar. At first reading here it just looks like you're Team Dumb but then I remember this has been explained to you repeatedly and you ignore it, which puts me more on Team Liar.
Click to expand...

Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.
 
Sheik Yerbouti

Sheik Yerbouti

Lifer
Feb 16, 2005
14,079
5,449
136
SlowSpyder said:
Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.
Click to expand...

that is one seriously thick bubble
 
B

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,845
30,615
136
SlowSpyder said:
Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.
Click to expand...

The derp is most post powerful with this one
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,285
136
SlowSpyder said:
Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.
Click to expand...

Lol, as previously mentioned HuffPost projections are not polls.

The fact that the national polls were accurate is simply an empirically established fact. The final RCP national polling average gave Clinton a lead of about 3.3 points and she won by 2.1. That means the polls correctly estimated it within 1.2 points, which is highly accurate.

My guess is that even when confronted with this fact you will refuse to accept it because it’s all about feels with you, not reals.
 
S

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
fskimospy said:
Lol, as previously mentioned HuffPost projections are not polls.

The fact that the national polls were accurate is simply an empirically established fact. The final RCP national polling average gave Clinton a lead of about 3.3 points and she won by 2.1. That means the polls correctly estimated it within 1.2 points, which is highly accurate.

My guess is that even when confronted with this fact you will refuse to accept it because it’s all about feels with you, not reals.
Click to expand...

The reals is she lost. The reals is the polls had her winning. The reals is the HP projection was based on poll information. The reals is we don't elect a president on popular vote. The reals is in office we have President Donald Trump. Say it with me, President Donald Trump, that's the reals, not saying it is the feels.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,285
136
SlowSpyder said:
The reals is she lost. The reals is the polls had her winning. The reals is the HP projection was based on poll information. The reals is we don't elect a president on popular vote. The reals is in office we have President Donald Trump. Say it with me, President Donald Trump, that's the reals, not saying it is the feels.
Click to expand...

Hahaha, as always I am zero percent shocked that when statistics and math tell you things you don’t want to believe you ignore them.
 
S

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
fskimospy said:
Hahaha, as always I am zero percent shocked that when statistics and math tell you things you don’t want to believe you ignore them.
Click to expand...

The feels won't let you say it. President Donald Trump. I didn't ignore the numbers, I pointed out how they were wrong.
 
MomentsofSanity

MomentsofSanity

Lifer
Jan 25, 2011
17,076
9,554
146
SlowSpyder said:
The feels won't let you say it. President Donald Trump. I didn't ignore the numbers, I pointed out how they were wrong.
Click to expand...
He won in spite of the popular vote. The polls predicted that pretty much bang on. What the polling couldn't have shown is the EC break down as it wasn't measuring that. Only the overall voting likelihood which can't be argued against. It was spot on.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,285
136
SlowSpyder said:
The feels won't let you say it. President Donald Trump. I didn't ignore the numbers, I pointed out how they were wrong.
Click to expand...

Predicting the election outcome within 1.2 points is highly accurate. You claimed they weren't accurate, which was a lie.
 
thraashman

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
The biggest problem with Trump will be that the Democrats elected to fix the mess he and Republicans create will have to spend years and a not insignificant amount of money fixing all the things they fuck up while working through the economy they crash. And then just when everything starts to turn around, fucking morons will elect an incompetent, racist, blowhard who dogwhistles to their most basic stupidity who will fuck it all up again ... Hmmm, why does this sound so familiar?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom