MAGA - Trump Accomplishments Thread - Now with links!

[zinfamous]

You can tell by how viscous in their attacks that the left is indeed worried at this point that Trump will be a successful president.

No one wanted Trump to be a shitty president. No one.

It just so happens that the vast majority of people in this country knew that Trump is a woefully incompetent individual, a terrible human, and would very likely make for an awful president. It happens, from what we know over this previous year, that those people are correct.

You, being the dotard that you are, are confusing what was known and what is for what people wanted. Stop being an idiot.

 

[Puffnstuff]

Here's his greatest consistent accomplishment: playing golf which is the very thing he swore he wouldn't do. Check out the cost to the taxpayers.

http://trumpgolfcount.com/

 

[SlowSpyder]

All in all Trump is doing a decent job in pushing his agenda and achieving. AT P&N is in a bubble and won't agree, but he'd easily win again against Hillary today, he likely has MORE pro-Trump voters today than before.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

All in all Trump is doing a decent job in pushing his agenda and achieving. AT P&N is in a bubble and won't agree, but he'd easily win again against Hillary today, he likely has MORE pro-Trump voters today than before.

Yes, that completely explains his numbers in polls as to how he's doing. We just need to look at those numbers through slow's eyes and we'll see that the 38% approval rating is a really, really good number, the bigliest of numbers. and the 58% that disapprove of his presidency is solely taken from the people here on this forum, so they don't count.

 

[brycejones]

Yes, that completely explains his numbers in polls as to how he's doing. We just need to look at those numbers through slow's eyes and we'll see that the 38% approval rating is a really, really good number, the bigliest of numbers. and the 58% that disapprove of his presidency is solely taken from the people here on this forum, so they don't count.

Polls are liberal lies

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Polls are liberal lies

along with 'facts' and 'science'
they do have alt-facts tho, so that's good, I guess.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Yes, that completely explains his numbers in polls as to how he's doing. We just need to look at those numbers through slow's eyes and we'll see that the 38% approval rating is a really, really good number, the bigliest of numbers. and the 58% that disapprove of his presidency is solely taken from the people here on this forum, so they don't count.

I love how you guys cling to polls with this president.

 

[Homerboy]

Polls are liberal lies

Even the one at 45% that Trump tweeted? That one cracks me up. Imagine bragging that the majority of people don't approve of you. Mind boggling stupid.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I love how you guys cling to polls with this president.

dude, she lost, get over it. what is your obsession with her?

 

[SlowSpyder]

dude, she lost, get over it. what is your obsession with her?

It is about the polls. The polls you continue to cling to.

 

[MooseNSquirrel]

It is about the polls. The polls you continue to cling to.

Nah, this is about a fake narrative that you insist on clinging to and the complete lack of understanding of how polling and projections work.

Net net, a minority of Americans got our sexual assaulter in chief elected, and as of today an even smaller minority support his ego driven incompetence.

#winning

 

[fskimospy]

It is about the polls. The polls you continue to cling to.

The national polls were highly accurate for the 2016 election, lol. Some state polls were off, but nobody is discussing state polls here. Color me shocked that when it comes to polling and statistics yet again you have no idea what you're talking about.

It's things like this that again bring up the debate in my head between if you're stupid or a liar. At first reading here it just looks like you're Team Dumb but then I remember this has been explained to you repeatedly and you ignore it, which puts me more on Team Liar.

 

[SlowSpyder]

The national polls were highly accurate for the 2016 election, lol. Some state polls were off, but nobody is discussing state polls here. Color me shocked that when it comes to polling and statistics yet again you have no idea what you're talking about.

It's things like this that again bring up the debate in my head between if you're stupid or a liar. At first reading here it just looks like you're Team Dumb but then I remember this has been explained to you repeatedly and you ignore it, which puts me more on Team Liar.

Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.

that is one seriously thick bubble

 

[brycejones]

Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.

The derp is most post powerful with this one

 

[Puffnstuff]

Trump should change his acronym to MABA - Make America Barf Again.😛

 

[fskimospy]

Yea, Huffington Post saying Billary had a 98%+ chance of winning was highly accurate. You nailed it again. Going to try and help you out here, when a poll doesn't jibe with reality, when a poll suggests the exact opposite of what happened in reality, it is not in fact highly accurate. Your liberal anti-right outlets sold you what you wanted to hear, clicks and ad revenue > truth.

Lol, as previously mentioned HuffPost projections are not polls.

The fact that the national polls were accurate is simply an empirically established fact. The final RCP national polling average gave Clinton a lead of about 3.3 points and she won by 2.1. That means the polls correctly estimated it within 1.2 points, which is highly accurate.

My guess is that even when confronted with this fact you will refuse to accept it because it’s all about feels with you, not reals.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Lol, as previously mentioned HuffPost projections are not polls.

The fact that the national polls were accurate is simply an empirically established fact. The final RCP national polling average gave Clinton a lead of about 3.3 points and she won by 2.1. That means the polls correctly estimated it within 1.2 points, which is highly accurate.

My guess is that even when confronted with this fact you will refuse to accept it because it’s all about feels with you, not reals.

The reals is she lost. The reals is the polls had her winning. The reals is the HP projection was based on poll information. The reals is we don't elect a president on popular vote. The reals is in office we have President Donald Trump. Say it with me, President Donald Trump, that's the reals, not saying it is the feels.

 

[fskimospy]

The reals is she lost. The reals is the polls had her winning. The reals is the HP projection was based on poll information. The reals is we don't elect a president on popular vote. The reals is in office we have President Donald Trump. Say it with me, President Donald Trump, that's the reals, not saying it is the feels.

Hahaha, as always I am zero percent shocked that when statistics and math tell you things you don’t want to believe you ignore them.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Hahaha, as always I am zero percent shocked that when statistics and math tell you things you don’t want to believe you ignore them.

The feels won't let you say it. President Donald Trump. I didn't ignore the numbers, I pointed out how they were wrong.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

The feels won't let you say it. President Donald Trump. I didn't ignore the numbers, I pointed out how they were wrong.

He won in spite of the popular vote. The polls predicted that pretty much bang on. What the polling couldn't have shown is the EC break down as it wasn't measuring that. Only the overall voting likelihood which can't be argued against. It was spot on.

 

[Ichinisan]

... he'd easily win again against Hillary today, he likely has MORE pro-Trump voters today than before.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha HAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaa!

*deep breath*

Delusion.

 

[fskimospy]

The feels won't let you say it. President Donald Trump. I didn't ignore the numbers, I pointed out how they were wrong.

Predicting the election outcome within 1.2 points is highly accurate. You claimed they weren't accurate, which was a lie.

 

[SlowSpyder]

Predicting the election outcome within 1.2 points is highly accurate. You claimed they weren't accurate, which was a lie.

Huff Post didn't give Hillary a 98%+ chance of winning based on the polls?

 

[thraashman]

The biggest problem with Trump will be that the Democrats elected to fix the mess he and Republicans create will have to spend years and a not insignificant amount of money fixing all the things they fuck up while working through the economy they crash. And then just when everything starts to turn around, fucking morons will elect an incompetent, racist, blowhard who dogwhistles to their most basic stupidity who will fuck it all up again ... Hmmm, why does this sound so familiar?