Dr. Antle Bhagavan of Big Cat Rescue
"You gotta have mild-mannered lions and tigers," Antle said. "Normally the lion will kill the tigers."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/item_Clr5RjvqTpoGGwtFpwLOPN Dr. Bhagavan Antle also said, "These are just some of my observations over the last 24 years as I have trained some 400 big cats and met hundreds more. By big cats, I only mean the Panthera family (lions, tigers, leopard, jaguars and hybrids) all the rest are in a different category and the small cats (including cheetah and pumas) are in a different class. "They will kill you, but it is not with the same intent and aggressive behavior. Male lions are 100 times harder to train than tigers." http://www.rexano.org/Res...g_cat_training_Frame.htm
Sam Stephens Zoologist from New Zealand for Animal Planet, said, " A male lion spends the first 4 years of its life just developing him self into a fighting machine, its his whole focus fighting to take over a pride, defending it for others." Dave Salmoni a tiger guy, later agreed with her.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2z-47pCb2g
Its obvious that young lions have a different up bringing then tigers. They fight far more from birth even upon first being introduced to there father as this clip shows. Lions are familiar with combat from an early age.
A mother's love: Lioness lashes out to protect cub when father gets a bit too rough
By
Daily Mail Reporter
UPDATED: 05:41 EST, 18 May 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...protects-son-father-gets-bit-competitive.html
Very awesome quotas, very straight forward, yeah heres one of a lion training his cubs, with nessisary roughness, which is needed to teach them to protect them selves against intruding prides an merauding males...thats just another implimation on how game lions are while tigers like all cats dont have that luxery of a father figure, so there is little to fight for. Tigers are assassins an live the life of the ninja, while lions are Mma fighters who live the life of a spartan...
http://books.google.com/books?id=Yl...lion+fighting+tiger&ie=ISO-8859-1&output=html
Cool quotas dude...I'll add them to the list in a few when I find there dates...by the way, scanning threw I noticed finally whimp ma gee, came across one of 6 artifacts of a tiger killing a lion...(the statue) I never included it simply because it was just made in the past 20 years, meaning [Not historical] just like his medalion...lol*it says right on the site they been in buisness for 15 years XD XD again not historical meaning its not based on any factual implimations, but at this point I'm glad hes found it an is twisting things around (like usual)
because comparing artifacts was getting a little boring since theres like 70 for the lion an only 6 for the tiger...while the 6 actually is only 3 because 1 is of a tiger an boar, an 2 are the tower of london just reproduced.
So why dont you quote his post an paste it on here about the romans so I can pick apart his pathetic attempt to re-paint his list. Because I need all his quotas anyway, to show where most say martial peters right in the article it self.
Edit:
There I updated the list an added Antle an the newzealand person sam, I'll add in a few new ones myself...I found 1 by this guy before I went down last night...
Merlin perkins
Initially, a tiger would win for its greater burst of speed and strength. However, tigers have no stamina. If the lion could hold out for ~1 minute, it would defeat the exhausted tiger.
As Mr. Marlin Perkins tells it, however, "a real tiger won't attack a rhinoceros just for the hell of it, any more than he will sleep on his back in lion country."
~
Naval Safety Center, 1972
http://www.google.com/search?q=Marlin+perkins+lion+tiger+fight+&tbm=bks&tbo=1
That quota is simple to understand, even clyde beatty pointed out tigers explosiveness leads to there down fall when fighting lions, which the mane is what bides them the time without even doing the fighting really, as perkins stated he thinks the lion can win if he can hold out that one minute, which is not all that hard. Its quite obvious hes gestering the lion fairs well in a fight along with a tiger fears a lion more so the other way around, a lion would have nothing to fear in tiger country simply because he is aided by his brothers an wives=8 on average...which like Kailash stated...even a single lion can prove to be more than a match for a tiger.
I think I remember this guy too, animal kingdom was a show of his, he was famed for being the crazy guy for picking up wild animal cubs of all animals...an hoisting them into his park.
I still have to add in others from my list. I remember a member in Ava on the back pages, had presented alfred courts book, an stated alfred was more fond of tigers an leopards but mentioned only because his lions would often bully them around...I dont know what pages it was on or exactly what he quoted, but this is alfred court
I want to add him to the list again but I need to know what he said first...its funny too, I havent came across any circus act where a tiger had a significant size difference to the lion, in fact, all shown from hundreds of pictures that the lion is slightly bigger. No doubt they are bengals, summatrans look like mini siberians, because they have thick an longer fur, while bengals fur is like a pitbulls very straped an short.
But in reality, I dont think a tiger will ever really look bigger than a lion due to his mane, some full grown adults in circuses resemble barbary lions, that is the common mistake an why tons for pablicity say they have them, which is not true...I think they died out way before the 18th century maybe the last were in the early 17th an possibly the mid 16th century...not one dna testing of a live Barbary was tested positive, only a slight resemblence in leo persica the indian an or persian lion. But again lions in captivity have inormous size manes that increase there mass 2 folds...