Silver Prime
Golden Member
- May 29, 2012
- 1,671
- 7
- 0
Edited for upgrading credability an adding in missing information added to page 17
Reguards ^_^
Reguards ^_^
Last edited:
Jesus H Christ... you're obsessed man! I haven't seen someone cherrypick data this much since a few posts ago in the ATP&N!
Not to throw mud on this thread but lets respect both these animals. If they fight in the wild, that's one thing. Too bad we cage these animals and they come into contact with each other. All for mankind's amusement.
Not to throw mud on this thread but lets respect both these animals. If they fight in the wild, that's one thing. Too bad we cage these animals and they come into contact with each other. All for mankind's amusement.
No. Tigers have stronger hind legs, which is crucial to fighting. They're also slightly heavier overall I think.Let's say the fight took place in an arena. Who would win? I think a male lion would beat all others. I'm not sure about tigers vs female lions though.
No. Tigers have stronger hind legs, which is crucial to fighting. They're also slightly heavier overall I think.
What about an equal weight in really, really pissed off squirrels?
400 rodenty psychos should do some damage.
-Basically you listed almost exclusively only lion victories and ignore the tiger ones; way to cherrypick data! There are a ton of videos on youtube of tigers beating the crap out of lions, which you chose to ignore. If you're going to go through historical analysis, then show both sides. You sound like one of the retards from the comic book battle forums, the same type of idiot who claims that Batman can beat Goku with enough prep time.
-lol, as I see it tigers 1 on 1 have some advantage since they're geared around solitary mode, but lions are socially smart hunters and hang in packs.
The toughest lion vs the toughest tiger? That's probably closer than you'd think because those old male lions are smart. Still with 100+ lb advantage tiger.
Sadly we have way to much PETA up in this bitch to actually stage this and find out definitively. Dogfighting bans I can understand because they have been domesticated, but lions and tigers are wild animals and constantly thirst for blood, we are simply giving them an outlet.
That doesent sound cool at all...there was to many of that in the past, if you wanna see who won then just look threw historical documents of certain cultures. Its been done tens of thousands of times already, you just have to un-cover its information.
But I get what you mean, a few video confronmations in the wild setting would be the holy grail of who usually wins, but unfortunatly that wont ever happen unless we replenish there status out of there current one...which is them going extinct. But humans can turn turn it around for them if they put a little effort into it.
For what its worth, heres a historical document that was recorded with very clean detail of a pretty big indian tiger fighting a lion...
-
-
A drama at the Ganges.
31st of March, 1851, In the Landshuter Zeitung (Landshut Newspaper)
Ill tell of one of these terrible fights, one you wouldnt see again in a hundred years, a scene of blood and death that forever will haunt my mind. [ ] The lion and his rival, the tiger, need air and space in great quantity. Here, and only here, are they really able to live and to rule. [ ] (A long description of lions and tigers and how fierce both of them are, the actual event follows now) A Malayan slave ran towards us and shouted: Lion! Lion! Down there, at the river! Its a big, fierce lion!
One more reason to take shelter in the house, continued the colonel. Come, my friends, take the weapons! The lion is a troublesome guest.
We closed the houses doors; the slaves got weapons and guarded the basement. We, to welcome this guest admirably, climbed up to the gallery from which we could overlook the Ganges. An unusually big lion walked haughtily down there, not looking around as he does when he has to fight an opponent, but instead ambling slowly and thoughtfully like a philosopher, he walked there. He stopped from time to time to rest a minute, and then continued majestically his way. Under a magnificent palm, he stopped, turned around two times, and finally lay down in the shadow. This was the rest of a magnificent ruler that had nothing to fear from any adversary. He rested easily, as do those who have made no enemies.
Scarcely ten minutes had the lion lain there, when suddenly, he jumped up as though struck by lightning, roaring very deeply and scratching the ground with both hind legs, as though challenging an adversary. He lowered his head and, in a single bound, jumped at the palms stem to look about, to the right and left. Then he jumped down to ground to wait again, and his gaze lingered at one particular spot on the horizon.
An enemy seems to approach, the colonel said, a terrible enemy, if we look at the lions reaction. I predict that it will be a fierce fight, and many rich people would pay a great sum to see it if they were here right now.
And why, I asked, dont they stage some fights from time to time, if they would pay so much?
Because what we have here is very rare. The lion wont fight against a human but against a fierce animal, one as strong as he himself, such as a rhinoceros, an elephant, or a tiger.
A tiger! Its really a tiger! one of us shouted pointing a finger at the dangerous beast which jumped in huge leaps towards the lion. It was breathtaking, our eyes wandered from the lion to the tiger and from the tiger to the lion. The lion still was lurking. It was a terrible spectacle and we wagered who will win. Now they stood eyeball to eyeball with each other. Theyd seen each other and wouldnt leave unless one of them was lying dead at the ground. The tiger was unbelievably huge and beautiful with his long black stripes distributed all over his yellowish body. His fearful eyes seemed to burn, his head was lowered. We stood, at the most, 200 feet away. The sun shone brightly, so we could see their every move. I dont think I have to mention that our hearts were in our mouths. The tiger closed in on the lion, but the lion remained calm. In the latter, we could see the force of the calmness in his powerful position; in the tiger, one could believe to see the violent tension of someone who has the impudence to disrespect a close danger, one who had the will to assault it. We could see a certain twitch in his legs, but he wasnt about to flee. Did the crouching tiger want to kill the lion? I believe it did, and I admire the royal tigers courage, he would rather lie down in a burning furnace than be accused of cowardice!
The lion had not moved at all, but we could see what was happening inside him by looking at his erected mane. From time to time, his countenance suggested a submissive gesture. But he, the king of animals, didnt want to show any fear, but rather boldness, to his opponent. A duel was now inevitable. For the tiger it may be a glorious day, but for the lion it was certainly a festive day.
With one leap, they could grab, bite, tear each other; with one leap theyd jump over the space of 20 feet that separated them from each other. Then, they leaped! The crash equaled the crash of two ships in a tempest! We could hear the bones breaking under the weight of their terrible paws, we could see chunks of flesh falling to the ground. They made no sound, but their gruff moaning indicated their rage and pain. Neither showed superiority and we wondered who would win. If the lion were to think that he had overpowered the tiger, the latter could earn the victory with a single move, shattering the surprised lion.
The fight now lasted 10 minutes, and suddenly, as if they came to an agreement, both loosened their grip to gain their breath again. It was the motionlessness of the rage, but it was the calmness of the king. A few moments later, an unexpected incident which resurrected the fight took place: The tiger, which saw not only his defeat but also his death, used the moment. While his opponent was licking his wounded hind leg, he leaped 10 feet up the palms stem and stayed there. The lion looked around and couldnt see his foe anymore; he roared, looked upwards, and he jumped at the tiger. But in this position it was impossible to continue the fight. They knew that only one of them would survive. The tiger jumped down and the lion followed him, but his leg caused him to shiver. A long fight wasnt possible any more. Their claws were blunted, their jaws were tired, and they had lost much blood.
The fighters jaws were wedged in each other as they bit at each others heads; we could feel the bones crushing. Suddenly the tiger retreated, wavered and fell down. The lion seized him with his terrible paws and it seemed like he wanted to punish the defeated opponent for his resistance.
He didnt loosen his grip, the merciless king of the forest, the feared lord of the wilderness; he tore the tiger apart, he crushed its skull. Suddenly a crocodile appeared out of the river. It seized the lion at his injured hind leg and dragged him into the water. The only remains of this fight were the dead tiger under the palm and some read streams of blood on the water surface.
Translated from German into English by Leofwin.
That sounds extremely fake.
The source was from a german newspaper archive, (which cannot be faked) due to laws of copy writing an a whole bunch of other infringements, though the story can be questioned in how ever way you want it to take it in, you wanna call it fake...ask me if I care? (I dont) I'm merely showing historical records.. I will see if I can dig up more information on it, a little later...but as is, its pretty legit if you ask me.
Records of there distributions in india are scattered, an all you have now days from B.s fans is saying they only ever lived in gir forest...which there sources "Censes" are only covering the late 18th an early 19th century something that is in later times before they were highly poached. There are tons of records showing before the 17th century lions inhabitated from east to west to north to south of india in certain locations. (With proof)=of Indian cultural diplictions an historical records. So please spare me, the oh lions never lived in jungles jazz.
Its really no biggie bud...I really am past the whole sceptic parts in terms of opinions...I merely find a document an present it, nothing more. I'm also intriged in most calling B.s info on scientifical confirmations, then spew out things like tigers have a 100+ pound advantage by linking wiki or secoundary sites. Or saying that all the experts in the world favors the tiger, when not more than 20 (with credability) of being affiliated to make a higher opinionational call can be presented of a tiger will win more often...in fact its just the oposite...more experts favor the lion, which in terms are qualified to have credability by showing there experince. Not just zoos, an wild life enthusiast but real deal people that have been around them all there lives an seen them fight the other.
I don't disagree a male lion would defeat a tiger of the same size, that story just sounded made up.