Levin: Memos don't show what Cheney says they do

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Wow. A democrat is calling a republican a liar. How unusual!

Perhaps, but that doesn't mean the Republican ISN'T a liar

Well of course its politics as usual. The thing thats disingenuous is the dems are just as guilty as the GOP. They knew, approved, and funded this shit. Support for enhanced interrigation techniques is a not a partisan issue. It really makes the Dems look...well...like a bunch of clowns.

Regardless of their culpability in the past (which is shameful), it most certainly IS a partisan issue now. The Democrats are trying to limit it, the Republicans are trying to stop them. I for one am glad that Democrats are at least trying to do the right thing now, as opposed to the Republicans continuing and gleeful embrace of torture.

I would agree with you eskimo, if only the Dems would take responsibility for their own culpability, and go after their own who clearly were just as guilty. But they arent.

Replace the outrageously false words 'just as' with 'also but much less', and I'll agree.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: JKing106
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.
That's why I said "allegedly." Did you catch that?



"...is just as guilty as the Republican Administration who came up with the idea..."

Sounds to like you think it's fact. The "allegedly" is thrown in their just to cover your ass if it's proven to be not true. But, you're not the only person to be asserting it's true on this forum. Or the media, for that matter. Smoke and mirrors...

You really want to know why you've been taught to hate Pelosi? Yes, I said taught, because you wouldn't give two shits about her if Fox hadn't told you to. She's hated for the same reason Hilary Clinton is hated... she's a woman, in a male dominated power structure. In the minds of people like Limbaugh, the thought process runs like "who does that uppity wise and beautiful woman think she is?" THAT is why she's catching shit. No other reason. And people like you are just stupid enough to step right into line with that moronic, outdated thinking. Congratulations, moron, you're a sheep.
You should re-read what I've said. I've said nothing of the kind. My point, was that Pelosi, even IF she was briefed on exactly the sort of torture that was done, is NOT as guilty as the administration who cooked up the whole idea of "enhanced interrogation" in the first place.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: JKing106
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.
That's why I said "allegedly." Did you catch that?



"...is just as guilty as the Republican Administration who came up with the idea..."

Sounds to like you think it's fact. The "allegedly" is thrown in their just to cover your ass if it's proven to be not true. But, you're not the only person to be asserting it's true on this forum. Or the media, for that matter. Smoke and mirrors...

You really want to know why you've been taught to hate Pelosi? Yes, I said taught, because you wouldn't give two shits about her if Fox hadn't told you to. She's hated for the same reason Hilary Clinton is hated... she's a woman, in a male dominated power structure. In the minds of people like Limbaugh, the thought process runs like "who does that uppity wise and beautiful woman think she is?" THAT is why she's catching shit. No other reason. And people like you are just stupid enough to step right into line with that moronic, outdated thinking. Congratulations, moron, you're a sheep.
You should re-read what I've said. I've said nothing of the kind. My point, was that Pelosi, even IF she was briefed on exactly the sort of torture that was done, is NOT as guilty as the administration who cooked up the whole idea of "enhanced interrogation" in the first place.

DealMonkey said "...is just as guilty as the Republican Administration who came up with the idea..." as a paraphrase of what others such as Blackangst were saying.

He was not making the statement, he was disagreeing with it, as I did.

JKing, I think you misread DealMonkey's post there, see the part where he said to let him get this straight that others are saying the quote above.

The '...' ellipsis in this case reversed his statement by removing the preceding text.
 

SecPro

Member
Jul 17, 2007
147
0
0
It's no real surprise that Adm. Blairs comments are being ignored here in the DU Lite echo chamber.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: SecPro
It's no real surprise that Adm. Blairs comments are being ignored here in the DU Lite echo chamber.

You want people to take you seriously when you call the Presidnt "ohblah-blah"?

Interesting too that you think that opposing torture is some radical left position, rather than the position that should be held by left, center and right.

And that you think the following comments are 'being ignored' here by people who have some hugely different view:

"I also strongly supported the president (Obama) when he declared that we would no longer use enhanced interrogation techniques. We do not need these techniques to keep America safe. The information gained from these techniques was valuable in some instances, but there is no way of knowing whether the same information could have been obtained through other means. The bottom line is these techniques have hurt our image around the world, the damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security."

His other comments somewhat defended what was done 'in the months after 9/11'.

It's not news that liberals are in disagreement with Obama over his opposition to legal accountability for the war crimes of the Bush administration.

That's already been discussed at length, it's not ignored, so an Obama appointee saying the above isn't really news either.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: SecPro

It's no real surprise that Adm. Blairs comments are being ignored here in the DU Lite echo chamber.

It's no real suprise that Admiral Blair's comments are the views of the vast minority. OTOH, Senator Levin has seen the exact memos Dickwad Cheney claims would prove him innocent, and he stated unequivocally that the docuements "say nothing about numbers of lives saved, nor do the documents connect acquisition of valuable intelligence to the use of abusive techniques."

Getting back to the real issue, the good news is, Admiral Blair is a military officer under the command of a Commander In Chief with far superior intellectual, ethical and moral values.

There is NO excuse for using torture, EVER! The consensus of the vast majority of experts on interrogation is that, aside from the fact that torture is illegal in the U.S. and almost every other nation in the civilized world, despite the fact that only an ethically challenged moral turd would advocate, let alone commit, such heinous acts, torture does NOT produce useful, reliable information.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,057
67
91
Originally posted by: SecPro

Cheney is telling the truth. Admiral Blair confirmed it.

Get over it.

Please prove it or STFU. Cheney wouldn't know the truth if it shot him in the face with a shotgun round. I suspect you wouldn't, either. :roll:
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Wow. A democrat is calling a republican a liar. How unusual!

Perhaps, but that doesn't mean the Republican ISN'T a liar

Well of course its politics as usual. The thing thats disingenuous is the dems are just as guilty as the GOP. They knew, approved, and funded this shit. Support for enhanced interrigation techniques is a not a partisan issue. It really makes the Dems look...well...like a bunch of clowns.

Again, that doesn't even remotely change what the Republicans did or did not do...

I'm with you that some Democrats are being hypocritical here, but it's equally moronic that many Republicans are refusing to defend (or even discuss) their own actions and instead fling mud at the Democrats. Lambasting Pelosi while ignoring Cheney is just as bad as doing it the other way around.

You mean like the fucking Dems are doing? Gimme a break. And yes, I give the nod to "Lambasting Pelosi while ignoring Cheney is just as bad as doing it the other way around". This whole outrage against the GOP without including the equally guilty Dems is shameful.

I just SAID that the Dems are equally guilty and being hypocritical when they go after Republicans without admitting their own culpability...that's why it's hypocrisy. What are you getting pissy at me for...I'm basically agreeing with you here...

Torture is bad enough. The fact that all either side can do is point fingers at their political opponents is almost worse. Democrats who go after Republicans when the Democrats share the blame is hypocritical, Republicans who use pointing out this hypocrisy as a distraction from THEIR part of the blame are just as bad. Politics should stop at the water's edge, or well before that, but clearly it doesn't. It's an important issue that it vital to our national defense and our moral standing in the world, and the fact that everyone on either side sees it as a club to bludgeon their political opposition with is probably the worst part of all.

Sorry man...wasnt directed at you :) I agree we agree on this one. :beer:
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: Genx87

So lets see the documents and prove Cheney a liar!

Senator Levin agrees. He said:

I hope that the documents are declassified, so that people can judge for themselves what is fact, and what is fiction," he added.

And I cant believe nobody in the media is roasting Pelosi over her obvious lies.

1. Assuming for the sake of argument that Pelosi lied, it wouldn't excuse the lies of your thankfully EX-Traitor In Cheif, or the EX-ViceTraitor In Cheif or any of the rest of their criminal gang.

2. I don't believe you can prove she HAS lied. The jury's still out on whether Pelosi "lied" when she said the CIA mislead her. Other Democrats who were "briefed" have stated that they were NOT told waterboarding was being used, and Republicans have stated the CIA has lied.

And your problem Harvey is you believe this. The Dems say they werent told you believe them, the GOP says interragation worked, you dont. I believe your pic should be listed next to the word partisan in the dictionary. Youre a blind hack.

And save your kiss my ass copy/paste.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: JKing106
Stop with the "well, you did it too!" bullshit. Bush, and his administration are war criminals.

Then where are the countries lining up at the Hague to prosecute?

*crickets*
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: JKing106
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Wow. A democrat is calling a republican a liar. How unusual!

Perhaps, but that doesn't mean the Republican ISN'T a liar

Well of course its politics as usual. The thing thats disingenuous is the dems are just as guilty as the GOP. They knew, approved, and funded this shit. Support for enhanced interrigation techniques is a not a partisan issue. It really makes the Dems look...well...like a bunch of clowns.

Regardless of their culpability in the past (which is shameful), it most certainly IS a partisan issue now. The Democrats are trying to limit it, the Republicans are trying to stop them. I for one am glad that Democrats are at least trying to do the right thing now, as opposed to the Republicans continuing and gleeful embrace of torture.

I would agree with you eskimo, if only the Dems would take responsibility for their own culpability, and go after their own who clearly were just as guilty. But they arent.

Wait, let me get this straight, Pelosi - who allegedly was BRIEFED about enhanced interrogation techniques - is just as guilty as the Republican Administration who came up with the idea, enabled teams of lawyers to try and justify it, and then systematically hid it from the American people, destroying evidence and blocking investigations?

Seriously, you're actually equating the two? That's laughable.

And what other Dems besides Pelosi even knew about it? (Allegedly, knew about it?) Can you name names?

And now the Democratic-controlled gov't is putting a stop to it, while Cheney and Bush are out there running a PR campaign claiming it's the greatest thing since warrantless wiretaps? Excuse me, but that's not the same at all. How about engaging your brain for once? These aren't the same positions at all. They're exactly 100% opposite.

Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...efed-on-waterboarding/

http://www.washingtontimes.com...s-waterboard-briefing/
Pelosi admits waterboard briefing

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITI.../pelosi.waterboarding/

http://www.newsmax.com/insidec...2009/05/12/213583.html

How many you need?
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Wow. A democrat is calling a republican a liar. How unusual!

Perhaps, but that doesn't mean the Republican ISN'T a liar

Well of course its politics as usual. The thing thats disingenuous is the dems are just as guilty as the GOP. They knew, approved, and funded this shit. Support for enhanced interrigation techniques is a not a partisan issue. It really makes the Dems look...well...like a bunch of clowns.

Regardless of their culpability in the past (which is shameful), it most certainly IS a partisan issue now. The Democrats are trying to limit it, the Republicans are trying to stop them. I for one am glad that Democrats are at least trying to do the right thing now, as opposed to the Republicans continuing and gleeful embrace of torture.

I would agree with you eskimo, if only the Dems would take responsibility for their own culpability, and go after their own who clearly were just as guilty. But they arent.

Replace the outrageously false words 'just as' with 'also but much less', and I'll agree.

Seeing how an accesory to murder can be just as guilty, so is the senate.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: JKing106
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.
That's why I said "allegedly." Did you catch that?



"...is just as guilty as the Republican Administration who came up with the idea..."

Sounds to like you think it's fact. The "allegedly" is thrown in their just to cover your ass if it's proven to be not true. But, you're not the only person to be asserting it's true on this forum. Or the media, for that matter. Smoke and mirrors...

You really want to know why you've been taught to hate Pelosi? Yes, I said taught, because you wouldn't give two shits about her if Fox hadn't told you to. She's hated for the same reason Hilary Clinton is hated... she's a woman, in a male dominated power structure. In the minds of people like Limbaugh, the thought process runs like "who does that uppity wise and beautiful woman think she is?" THAT is why she's catching shit. No other reason. And people like you are just stupid enough to step right into line with that moronic, outdated thinking. Congratulations, moron, you're a sheep.
You should re-read what I've said. I've said nothing of the kind. My point, was that Pelosi, even IF she was briefed on exactly the sort of torture that was done, is NOT as guilty as the administration who cooked up the whole idea of "enhanced interrogation" in the first place.

She has admitted she was. Learn to google. Or click the link a couple posts up that shows it. And the fact she WAS briefed, and continued to not only fund it and condone it, but encourage her counterparts to also, makes her an accessory.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: JKing106
...

Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...efed-on-waterboarding/

http://www.washingtontimes.com...s-waterboard-briefing/
Pelosi admits waterboard briefing

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITI.../pelosi.waterboarding/

http://www.newsmax.com/insidec...2009/05/12/213583.html

How many you need?

I think everyone here knows my stance on most political issues, but this really isn't a political issue at all. blackangst1 is right, the commentators talking about Pelosi are right. I'm as big of a Democrat as you can find, and I think in this case it's pretty clear Pelosi is just completely full of shit. Now it doesn't change what anyone else said or did, but the fact is that if we're going to fire people or put them on trial or make them resign for being involved in waterboarding, that list should include Pelosi and anyone else in Congress who stood idly by while it was happening.

Now that the Republican party basically consists of some guys sitting in a bar in Alabama, I'm sure it feels a lot safer for Pelosi and folks like her to take a "strong" stance against waterboarding. But you know what? The tide of public opinion has changed, we have a new President, and an intelligence community that has said they abandoned the practice. What the fuck do we need fair weather Democrats like Pelosi for now? When we really needed her was when we didn't know what was going on, and she and her fellow Congressional representatives should have done something about it on our behalf. THAT'S what we elect these people for, not to jump on the bandwagon when it's politically safe to do so.

I'm pissed at Bush and the Republicans for all they did to harm what this country is supposed to stand for. But I'm just as mad at my party for their totally pathetic inability to locate their backbone when we really needed them to. Maybe someone should be jumping up and down on the Republicans for supporting waterboarding, but it sure as shit shouldn't be the people like Pelosi who had a chance to do something about it before and totally failed to do so.

Part of the problem with politics in this country is that everyone is so caught up in partisan fighting that they forget there are real issues at stake. And sometimes solving those issues is more important than scoring political points...sometimes it even requires you to admit that your "side" is less than perfect. And an inability to do that makes someone a shmuck, whether they're on the left or the right...

Edit: Most of that isn't meant to be directed at you, blackangst1, by the way...your links just gave me a convenient jumping off point :)
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Again, double standard.
Says you.

Al Gore, as just one example, waited TWO years before he started commenting publicly on the following administration. Cheney waited, what? Two weeks? Two days?

I guess folks like you can't see the difference there, no big surprise. Ah, and Genx87 too I see. No difference between 2 years and 2 weeks, eh? Yeah, it's all the same.

You two are hilarious.
Actually, this is Obama's fault.

He released the memos and went after members of the Bush admin and this left Cheney with no choice but to defend his actions.

So much has happened since this started that we forget how it actually started.
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,137
225
106
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Again, double standard.
Says you.

Al Gore, as just one example, waited TWO years before he started commenting publicly on the following administration. Cheney waited, what? Two weeks? Two days?

I guess folks like you can't see the difference there, no big surprise. Ah, and Genx87 too I see. No difference between 2 years and 2 weeks, eh? Yeah, it's all the same.

You two are hilarious.
Actually, this is Obama's fault.

He released the memos and went after members of the Bush admin and this left Cheney with no choice but to defend his actions.

So much has happened since this started that we forget how it actually started.

Well, we can't release all the information as it would hurt the troops and the nations credibility. Who's side are you on?

Torture isn't Obama's fault it's the GOP for letting it happen. I'd love to see bush behind bars for actions. I mean both bush and cheney.

 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: JKing106
...

Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...efed-on-waterboarding/

http://www.washingtontimes.com...s-waterboard-briefing/
Pelosi admits waterboard briefing

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITI.../pelosi.waterboarding/

http://www.newsmax.com/insidec...2009/05/12/213583.html

How many you need?

I think everyone here knows my stance on most political issues, but this really isn't a political issue at all. blackangst1 is right, the commentators talking about Pelosi are right. I'm as big of a Democrat as you can find, and I think in this case it's pretty clear Pelosi is just completely full of shit. Now it doesn't change what anyone else said or did, but the fact is that if we're going to fire people or put them on trial or make them resign for being involved in waterboarding, that list should include Pelosi and anyone else in Congress who stood idly by while it was happening.

Now that the Republican party basically consists of some guys sitting in a bar in Alabama, I'm sure it feels a lot safer for Pelosi and folks like her to take a "strong" stance against waterboarding. But you know what? The tide of public opinion has changed, we have a new President, and an intelligence community that has said they abandoned the practice. What the fuck do we need fair weather Democrats like Pelosi for now? When we really needed her was when we didn't know what was going on, and she and her fellow Congressional representatives should have done something about it on our behalf. THAT'S what we elect these people for, not to jump on the bandwagon when it's politically safe to do so.

I'm pissed at Bush and the Republicans for all they did to harm what this country is supposed to stand for. But I'm just as mad at my party for their totally pathetic inability to locate their backbone when we really needed them to. Maybe someone should be jumping up and down on the Republicans for supporting waterboarding, but it sure as shit shouldn't be the people like Pelosi who had a chance to do something about it before and totally failed to do so.

Part of the problem with politics in this country is that everyone is so caught up in partisan fighting that they forget there are real issues at stake. And sometimes solving those issues is more important than scoring political points...sometimes it even requires you to admit that your "side" is less than perfect. And an inability to do that makes someone a shmuck, whether they're on the left or the right...

Edit: Most of that isn't meant to be directed at you, blackangst1, by the way...your links just gave me a convenient jumping off point :)

Well said Rainsford, and a very brave post (for this forum). It takes guts to admit your side is wrong. Now for me, I havent commented too much about the WB issue, because frankly there is too much we DONT know. Whether or not we agree that it is torture is a moot point. The more relevant point is who knew what, and when. All of my lambasting the Dems for their faux moral outrage is under the presumption that they knew what was going on, not the fact that its Dems. I have thrown my own outrage at Bush for various reasons, but clearly now the lights need to be focused on the Dems. Its their turn in the spotlight, and its their turn to expose the skeletons in THEIR closets.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: ericlp
Well, we can't release all the information as it would hurt the troops and the nations credibility. Who's side are you on?

Torture isn't Obama's fault it's the GOP for letting it happen. I'd love to see bush behind bars for actions. I mean both bush and cheney.
There was NO reason for Obama to release the torture memos like he did.

The practice had been stopped years prior and there was nothing for him to gain and more importantly it did nothing to help protect us from future attacks. The release of the memos was part of a political show put on by Obama and it backfired when Cheney started firing back, along with others who were around at the time.
 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Again, double standard.
Says you.

Al Gore, as just one example, waited TWO years before he started commenting publicly on the following administration. Cheney waited, what? Two weeks? Two days?

I guess folks like you can't see the difference there, no big surprise. Ah, and Genx87 too I see. No difference between 2 years and 2 weeks, eh? Yeah, it's all the same.

You two are hilarious.

So - what makes TWO years better than TWO weeks? It still happened.
 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
Originally posted by: JKing106

Where's the proof Pelosi was briefed? Link it please. And if it's a link to Fox, or Limbaugh/Savage/Hannity's sites, then it's bullshit.

Maybe it's hiding out with the proof that Cheney's lying.
 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
Originally posted by: ericlp


Well, we can't release all the information as it would hurt the troops and the nations credibility. Who's side are you on?

Torture isn't Obama's fault it's the GOP for letting it happen. I'd love to see bush behind bars for actions. I mean both bush and cheney.

Huh. From reading here, I thought the United Stated didn't have any credibility to lose.

That said, it's "the GOP's fault"? :confused: