• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Legitimate rape victims don't get pregnant

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
biden told a group of black people that romney would put them back in chains but there is no outrage over that because he is a democrat

As well sean hannity is NOT a Conservative, he is a neo-con and a liberal

You owe me a new keyboard dude. That one is still pegging the needle on the Clueless Meter!
 
biden told a group of black people that romney would put them back in chains but there is no outrage over that because he is a democrat

As well sean hannity is NOT a Conservative, he is a neo-con and a liberal



.............



I'm not sure exactly how to address stupidity of that magnitude. Wow. Just, wow.
 
Pure nonsense.

Men can aither use condoms or get a vasectomy.

You are trying to argue that the consequence for a joint decision should only lie with one party simply because the consequence of that decision soly lies with that one party.

So because a woman makes the final decision in your mind she bears 100% responsibility.

But this would be akin to saying that a person who throws a brick off a tall building bears no responsibility for injuring the person they hit because that person had the option of wearing a helmet out in public.

Guess what, if you drink and drive and kill someone in another car because they weren;t wearing a seat belt, you are still guilty of manslaughter.

The fact is, once that egg is fertilized, men lose 100% of their choice going forward. A bit lopsided.
 
wow people comparing cancer to being pregnant?

men don't really have a say. while i think it sucks i do understand. We aren't the ones that will have to carry it.

i am against abortion. though in cases of rape, child mollestation (yeah yeah some classify this as rape too i agree. just makeing sure its out there), to save the mother and in very rare cases if the childs health.
 
wow people comparing cancer to being pregnant?

men don't really have a say. while i think it sucks i do understand. We aren't the ones that will have to carry it.

i am against abortion. though in cases of rape, child mollestation (yeah yeah some classify this as rape too i agree. just makeing sure its out there), to save the mother and in very rare cases if the childs health.

No, we dont have to carry it. We do, however, have to pay for it. For 18 years.
 
Explain. He is a fake Conservative, he pretends to be Conservative but still supports the corporatists

Hate to break it to ya, but Conservatism itself has become a cult ideology of corporate ass kissing for about 30 years. The only difference is one group of conservatives want to sell out the USA to the corporations the old fashioned way and not rock the boat too much. (neo-cons/establishment GOPers)

The other conservatives (neo-liberals -or what is known in backward politics of America as "libertarians") want it all handed to the "free market" with no regard to history and the failures of capitalism (wild eyed idealists who think MORE capitalism is always the answer)

Take your pick, or choose Democrats, who are selling us out a bit slower to keep up with political trends of the right backpedaling their own basic message in reactionary defensive mode. (a strategy bound to inevitable failure -the best defense; is a good offense)

Personally I think none of the above have a clue what being a American is about in 2012.
 
Last edited:
Hate to break it to ya, but Conservatism itself has become a cult ideology of corporate ass kissing for about 30 years. The only difference is one group of conservatives want to sell out the USA to the corporations the old fashioned way and not rock the boat too much. (neo-cons/establishment GOPers)

The other conservatives (neo-liberals -or what is known in backward politics of America as "libertarians") want it all handed to the "free market" with no regard to history and the failures of capitalism (wild eyed idealists who think MORE capitalism is always the answer)

Take your pick, or choose Democrats, who are selling us out a bit slower to keep up with political trends of the right backpedaling their own basic message in reactionary defensive mode. (a strategy bound to inevitable failure -the best defense; is a good offense)

Personally I think none of the above have a clue what being a American is about in 2012.

Partisan hackery at its finest! democrats are selling us out, you do realize that obama and romney have Goldman Sachs as there highest donors

The US was built on Capitalism not socialism. socialism wont work and results in less freedom.



Rule #1. No thread-crapping, thread-derailment, off-topic posting, trolling, the intentional posting of logical fallacies or misinformation.

No link, misinformation, and yet another instance of your trolling. Enjoy your vacation.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Partisan hackery at its finest! democrats are selling us out, you do realize that obama and romney have Goldman Sachs as there highest donors

The US was built on Capitalism not socialism. socialism wont work and results in less freedom.

All three are false choices, maybe we disagree at how fast each will get us there but we all know where the neo-liberal train is heading, regardless of your cars position on the rail in relation to the engine of dysfunction.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPr9ZAr43gg
 
Does the Romney campaign have a muzzle fund, so that they can adequately distribute enough devises to properly silence the entirety of their party every day until November 6th?

That's really their only shot at this point.


youch.
 
Partisan hackery at its finest! democrats are selling us out, you do realize that obama and romney have Goldman Sachs as there highest donors

The US was built on Capitalism not socialism. socialism wont work and results in less freedom.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444752504578024661927487192.html

'Employees at Goldman donated more than $1 million to Mr. Obama when he first ran for president. This election, they have given the president's campaign $136,000—less than Mr. Obama has collected from employees of the State Department. The employees have contributed nothing to the leading Democratic super PAC supporting his re-election.

By contrast, Goldman employees have given Mr. Romney's campaign $900,000, plus another $900,000 to the super PAC founded to help him.

Resentments against the White House began, said senior Goldman executives, because the firm thought it would be consulted when the Obama administration began crafting regulations in response to the financial crisis. They weren't. Instead, they were surprised by a measure dubbed the Volcker rule, which would damage one of Goldman's lucrative businesses.

Goldman executives, especially those who had raised millions of dollars for Mr. Obama's election, said they were offended by the president's populist rhetoric, including his famous quip about "fat cat bankers."

"Look at what he did—he attacked those guys and made it personal," said Rick Hohlt, a financial-services lobbyist. "In the old days you give money because you want to have a seat at the table even if you get screwed. But they weren't even offering a seat at the table."'



People don't even bother looking shit up any more. Look up the donors to Obama and Romney's superPACS. Romney is the one getting tons of money from the banks and financial institutions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top