You expect women to be responsible for *everything* associated with sex and reproduction. You want men to be free to have sex with whomever they want, whenever they want, as often as they want, and for women to take care of everything associated with birth control, pregnancy, childbirth and/or abortion.
In another thread, you claimed that pregnancy occurs when "a woman allows" a man to ejaculate inside of her. You revealed in that sentence everything that you are about: even the male orgasm is twisted around to be the woman's responsibility.
Your only answer for a man not wanting to have a child is for him to practice abstinence.
No, that's my only answer *for you*, because you take the position that men who make women pregnant should bear no responsibility for what they have done.
You are the one who claims women should be forced to have abortions rather than men be forced to take equal financial responsibility for getting them pregnant.
Your position is not one of equality. It is one that makes life maximally easy for men, and maximally difficult for women.
While largely condemning Akin for his remarks, Republicans ready to add push for anti-abortion amendment to party platform:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...nn-gop-prepares-tough-anti-abortion-platform/
The GOP's abortion plank faces scrutiny every four years, and this year's document contains language similar to the platforms that were adopted by the party at their conventions in 2000, 2004 and 2008.
Why is this a surprise exactly?
Why is this a surprise exactly?
It's no surprise really.would outlaw abortion without making explicit exemptions for rape
I don't think the government should pay for that. I propose canings for drug possession. That will cut down on the problem, it worked for singapore.
so you are for larger, more powerful government intruding on your daily life, making your life choices for you?
I don't get you supposed "small government" people.
...It's only for when you think it's convenient for you, right?
Yes yes...let's do what Singapore does.
The GOP's abortion plank faces scrutiny every four years, and this year's document contains language similar to the platforms that were adopted by the party at their conventions in 1874, 1916 and 1952.
Why is this a surprise exactly?
Romney wants Akin to drop out...the pressure mounts.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...f695a2-eb8c-11e1-9ddc-340d5efb1e9c_story.html
Akin is now way up shit creek without a paddle. McCaskill will be really pissed if he drops out.OMG Romney says to drop out!
this will be interesting indeed.
Akin is now way up shit creek without a paddle. McCaskill will be really pissed if he drops out.
If you think that is an accurate characterization of my argument then you have failed to apprehend it. I am Jack's compete lack of surprise.So because I expect women to be responsible for themselves that means I dont think they are people
Completely preposterous. It is obvious you're simply projecting because you lack a coherent argument.No. In fact it is YOU who does not view men as people. But rather a slave that exists merely to serve women.
yeah... there is no way Akin's stays in the race now, not unless he is willing to throw the POTUS race too while he is at it.
If you think that is an accurate characterization of my argument then you have failed to apprehend it. I am Jack's compete lack of surprise.
Moreover, you haven't established that women are not responsible for themselves, so your expectation is irrelevant.
Completely preposterous. It is obvious you're simply projecting because you lack a coherent argument.
Why did you only address a small portion of my post? Couldn't assemble any arguments in rebuttal, I presume.
Maybe mommy didn't cuddle you enough, or maybe the pretty girl laughed at you when you asked her to dance in junior high
Men can have cancerous tumors removed from their bodies at their own behest.
whatever it was, it's time to grow up and realize that women are people, too. If you want to go have your appendix removed, or donate a kidney, or excise a mole, or pierce your nipple, you get to decide that on your own. Nobody can force you to give your brother one of your kidneys. Nobody can put holes in your ears without your express permission. When you understand why you have the right to say "no" to kidney donation or an appendectomy, you'll understand why women have the right to terminate their pregnancy.
Cancer is not choice.
Now, as for a pregnancy being a choice...
If it is not. The completely destroys any reasoning behind forcing men to be responsible for a woman's reproductive choice. He did not choose to get her pregnant. Nor did he choose to bring it to term.
Her choice her responsibility. Seems pretty simple.
I never said they did not have the right to terminate a pregnancy
I said they did not have the right to force society, or their baby daddy, to bear the consequences of their choice to bring it to term. Liberals wish for society in general, and men in particular, to be slaves to women's reproductive choices.
When parthenogenesis becomes a reality you might have a point. For right now it takes two to tango, even if not in the strictest sense.
What do you mean. A fetus is part of a woman's body. Haven't you been paying attention to the Supreme Court and Democratic Party?
What do you mean. A fetus is part of a woman's body. Haven't you been paying attention to the Supreme Court and Democratic Party?