sactoking
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2007
- 7,633
- 2,894
- 136
Actually, for all of the questions about calling parents vs calling cops, the necessity of calling cops etc, there was probably good reason for what went down. Here is a scenario that is completely hypothetical but also completely plausible.
Kid misbehaves in class. Kid tears things off wall and throws them. Kid is a danger to self and others. Kid gets sent to principal's office. While in principal's office kid knocks over bookshelf and injures principal. District policy classified this injury as a worker's compensation issue which triggers a very specific series of events. If principal fails to follow work comp procedures he could lose his job. Since work comp injury was caused by student policy requires police to be notified. Policy does not have allowances for age of student. Police arrive and student is still deemed to be a treat to self or others. Police policy dictates that threat be handcuffed. Police policy does not have allowances for age of threat. If police fail to adhere to policy they could lose jobs, especially if threat subsequently does injure self or others.
Again, hypothetical scenario built around what was in the article but also completely plausible. We know the kid injured the principal. There is a very high likelihood (~100%) that said injury would be a work comp injury. We know that the police stated 'policy said we had to cuff her, no exceptions'. So what's left is a scenario where we decry the adults for not using "common sense" but fail to realize that the adults were only following the orders we (as a society) gave them for that exact scenario.
Kid misbehaves in class. Kid tears things off wall and throws them. Kid is a danger to self and others. Kid gets sent to principal's office. While in principal's office kid knocks over bookshelf and injures principal. District policy classified this injury as a worker's compensation issue which triggers a very specific series of events. If principal fails to follow work comp procedures he could lose his job. Since work comp injury was caused by student policy requires police to be notified. Policy does not have allowances for age of student. Police arrive and student is still deemed to be a treat to self or others. Police policy dictates that threat be handcuffed. Police policy does not have allowances for age of threat. If police fail to adhere to policy they could lose jobs, especially if threat subsequently does injure self or others.
Again, hypothetical scenario built around what was in the article but also completely plausible. We know the kid injured the principal. There is a very high likelihood (~100%) that said injury would be a work comp injury. We know that the police stated 'policy said we had to cuff her, no exceptions'. So what's left is a scenario where we decry the adults for not using "common sense" but fail to realize that the adults were only following the orders we (as a society) gave them for that exact scenario.