Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
So...how did this kid get into the "lockbox"?
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Better he go after those that raised him that way then others.
Originally posted by: Insomniator
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
Please provide proof.
How do you need proof for that?
What the hell are you even talking about?
Yeah someone show proof that depriving a child of what every single other child has/will be doing/talking about/relating to has a chance to make him fucked up.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I would suspect that the parents had reason to believe their son was disturbed and for that reason wished to prevent him having access to the game.
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I would suspect that the parents had reason to believe their son was disturbed and for that reason wished to prevent him having access to the game.
Good perspective.
Originally posted by: darkxshade
So the kid broke into the lockbox to get the game, found the gun and used it on his parents? The article left out lots of important details.
Oh, and a minister with a gun?
/flamesuiton
Originally posted by: Oyeve
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
I would suspect that the parents had reason to believe their son was disturbed and for that reason wished to prevent him having access to the game.
Good perspective.
But why the 9mm in the lockbox next to the game in question? Sounds like the parents weren't too bright. If the kid knew where the game was or even just keeping the game in the house, why the hell would you keep it near a gun knowing the kid would most likely at least attempt to look for the game?
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
Please provide proof.
"Prosecutors at the murder trial of 17-year-old Daniel Petric claim that the teen shot both of his parents, killing his mother, because they wouldn't let him play Halo 3. "
haha. Owned.
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
pretty much
make sure you wear your bullet proof vest when you're depriving your children of a normal life
Dibs on SagaLore's stuff after his kids kill him.Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
Please provide proof.
"Prosecutors at the murder trial of 17-year-old Daniel Petric claim that the teen shot both of his parents, killing his mother, because they wouldn't let him play Halo 3. "
Originally posted by: Jeff7
My parents didn't let me get Nintendo, Sega, etc. We had a rockin' 386 PC (well ok, it was midrange at the time), and they said I played too many games on it anyway.
Ahhh, Dune II, Raptor, Commander Keen......Good stuff.
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
pretty much
make sure you wear your bullet proof vest when you're depriving your children of a normal life
Weird, there are plenty of kids at the school that I teach at who only get ABC, NBC, and CBS... if the weather is just right. They're not allowed to own video games, and have turned out incredibly normal. Every last one of them is well above average & will get to go to the college of their choice. And, at school, they're involved in all sorts of extra-curricular activities & are well adjusted.
Originally posted by: darkxshade
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
Please provide proof.
"Prosecutors at the murder trial of 17-year-old Daniel Petric claim that the teen shot both of his parents, killing his mother, because they wouldn't let him play Halo 3. "
hehe this is gonna get interesting... Sagalore your rebuttal?![]()
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: darkxshade
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
Please provide proof.
"Prosecutors at the murder trial of 17-year-old Daniel Petric claim that the teen shot both of his parents, killing his mother, because they wouldn't let him play Halo 3. "
hehe this is gonna get interesting... Sagalore your rebuttal?![]()
why would he need a rebuttal? That implies that the point wasn't in his favor. Are you guys too retarded to realize that he wouldn't have owned an xbox 360 in the first place if it wasn't for games before Halo 3?
i.e. this kid DID play video games. And, he's fucked up. So fucked up that he snapped and shot both his parents because they refused to indulge him and allow him to waste even more time playing video games.
Sagalore 1, Idiots 0
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
pretty much
make sure you wear your bullet proof vest when you're depriving your children of a normal life
Weird, there are plenty of kids at the school that I teach at who only get ABC, NBC, and CBS... if the weather is just right. They're not allowed to own video games, and have turned out incredibly normal. Every last one of them is well above average & will get to go to the college of their choice. And, at school, they're involved in all sorts of extra-curricular activities & are well adjusted.
Extremes are always bad. Gotta adjust it for your kids/family. Of my two little sisters that are now adults, it took two totally different parenting styles. One needed a slap on the wrist/physical punishment to learn her lessons while the other responded well to those "lame" punishments now like "time-out" and being sent to her room.
Just like how there are so many kids nowadays who grow up to be adults, find out they can buy guns and are completely unsafe to themselves and those around them or go around being gun-grabbing pansies. Then there are the kids raised and taught gun safety/respect and are the ones realizing how many crazy people that either have guns or want to take their guns away.
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Oceandevi
A shining example of christian forgiveness by the father.
At least they can all laugh about this in heaven. Since this life we live is of no real importance.
So why are you still here?
Though it's not really necessary to use guns at a young age; just so long as kids are aware of them, the power they have, and the implications of using and abusing that power.Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Extremes are always bad. Gotta adjust it for your kids/family. Of my two little sisters that are now adults, it took two totally different parenting styles. One needed a slap on the wrist/physical punishment to learn her lessons while the other responded well to those "lame" punishments now like "time-out" and being sent to her room.
Just like how there are so many kids nowadays who grow up to be adults, find out they can buy guns and are completely unsafe to themselves and those around them or go around being gun-grabbing pansies. Then there are the kids raised and taught gun safety/respect and are the ones realizing how many crazy people that either have guns or want to take their guns away.
I'd wager that these problems existed in generations past; there will always be maladjusted people. In the past though, it was probably more of a "shut up and get to work" environment, where there wasn't as much opportunity for someone to lash out. Hard labor isn't exactly mentally-stimulating either. And weapons weren't as easy to obtain, or as effective. Now a gun is reasonably cheap, and quite efficient.Originally posted by: DrPizza
wtf are you talking about? (the first paragraph there) The rabid infatuation with video games is really only one generation long. Ditto 135 channels of shit on the tv which doesn't develop the mind at all. If anything, my observations are that the kids who play the most video games are also the most maladjusted.
....
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I already decided that my kids aren't going to be watching any TV.
Now I'm starting to think that video games will be the next restriction...
Doing so will increase the likelihood that they will end up even more fucked up than if you had you let them watch TV and play games.
pretty much
make sure you wear your bullet proof vest when you're depriving your children of a normal life
Weird, there are plenty of kids at the school that I teach at who only get ABC, NBC, and CBS... if the weather is just right. They're not allowed to own video games, and have turned out incredibly normal. Every last one of them is well above average & will get to go to the college of their choice. And, at school, they're involved in all sorts of extra-curricular activities & are well adjusted.
Extremes are always bad. Gotta adjust it for your kids/family. Of my two little sisters that are now adults, it took two totally different parenting styles. One needed a slap on the wrist/physical punishment to learn her lessons while the other responded well to those "lame" punishments now like "time-out" and being sent to her room.
Just like how there are so many kids nowadays who grow up to be adults, find out they can buy guns and are completely unsafe to themselves and those around them or go around being gun-grabbing pansies. Then there are the kids raised and taught gun safety/respect and are the ones realizing how many crazy people that either have guns or want to take their guns away.
wtf are you talking about? (the first paragraph there) The rabid infatuation with video games is really only one generation long. Ditto 135 channels of shit on the tv which doesn't develop the mind at all. If anything, my observations are that the kids who play the most video games are also the most maladjusted.
The second paragraph - makes little sense. A very high percentage of households are anti-gun. I don't see kids from those households running out and purchasing guns in record numbers after they hit 18 years old and move out. Nor do I find that kids from those environments are any more likely to be better or worse than their counterparts. I do, however, agree with the notion that kids brought up respecting firearms are less likely to abuse firearms. Then again, this very situation could actually be used as evidence against that argument - obviously the parents owned a firearm. And obviously, the behavior that they modeled with that firearm was one of safety - the gun was kept locked up.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Though it's not really necessary to use guns at a young age; just so long as kids are aware of them, the power they have, and the implications of using and abusing that power.
I'm sure there were rules about Spear Control back when they were the newest WMD, following right on the heels of Fire as the #1 threat.
