NWRMidnight
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2001
- 3,509
- 3,047
- 136
This has to be 100% illegal.Look at the electoral college working as the founders intended.
This has to be 100% illegal.Look at the electoral college working as the founders intended.
What do you think attracts more gettable voters?
Picking a competent, well-liked VP candidate from a crucial swing state...or going after fringe margins on Fox News and JRE where 99.9% of these audiences already despise her?? Lol
Weird is way weak a word for that guy.
It's only as illegal as much as someone is willing to enforce the law. And Trump and Musk have not really been held to account in that respect. So why would they stop now?This has to be 100% illegal.
Agreed, nothing will happen of it except months from now we will learn Elon never selected any winners.It's only as illegal as much as someone is willing to enforce the law. And Trump and Musk have not really been held to account in that respect. So why would they stop now?
This has to be 100% illegal.
The way it is structured most likely yes.
I believe they will simply claim that their incentives was to register people to vote, not to influence who they vote for.
Because c'mon, we know there are different rules for them.
When are you ever going to criticize Trump for only going after his always-Trumpers? It's his entire strategy.
When you are going to criticize Trump for picking the worst, or maybe 2nd-worst VP candidate in history?
When are you going to criticize Trump...for anything?
You know your "analysis" of things that you clearly don't understand would probably hold some sort of weight around here if you actually made an attempt to look at both sides of this thing, but all you have ever done, for 8 years, is come in here and stump for Trump--Vlad's anointed candidate for the US presidency.
One wonders why this is...actually, no one wonders why this is. You are preposterously transparent.
You have to admit it’s a bit weird how you constantly make wrong predictions and they are always wrong in the exact same direction.I know you Blueanons have your Russia blinders on 24/7, but are you sure you're not confusing me with someone else? I haven't even posted in the politics section for 8 years, and most of it is doomer stuff about what's coming next. At this point I have to conclude that you're just a troll.
Agreed, from day one I said he was far too much of a traditionalist. Wrong guy to right now.Where the fuck is that waste of life Merrick Garland?
I would temper some of the assumptions that huge early turnout favors Dems...seems that GOP's ground game may be working well in some areas:
Hopefully he'll be history soon enough.Agreed, from day one I said he was far too much of a traditionalist. Wrong guy to right now.
Source? not a tweetI would temper some of the assumptions that huge early turnout favors Dems...seems that GOP's ground game may be working well in some areas:
i mean that's *A* county. and if it's historically red, that's not really surprising. statewide tallies would be more meaningfulI would temper some of the assumptions that huge early turnout favors Dems...seems that GOP's ground game may be working well in some areas:
i mean that's *A* county. and if it's historically red, that's not really surprising. statewide tallies would be more meaningful
Amid huge changes among voters in both voting method and timing people should be very very careful about drawing any conclusions in any direction. In NV specifically in 2020 there was an enormous operation to get D voters to do mail voting and to mail them as early as possible due to USPS delay concerns. That's not the case this year and the 2022 midterms exhibited similar shifts back.
Edit:
Expanding on this a bit people are going to hear a lot about the Nevada D-R voter registration gap almost closing. This is usually talked about without the context that non-partisan identification has exploded and overtaken both parties in the state. Further complicates analysis a great deal.
Sept 2020 RVs:
Rep 566,265
Dem 654,724
Ind 409,125
Sept 2024 RVs:
Rep 574,270
Dem 593,223
Ind 663,613
I’d argue that a rise in independents is a clear loss for republicans.
Yard signs here were mostly Trump until a few weeks ago. Now it’s about 50/50.