BoomerD
No Lifer
- Feb 26, 2006
- 66,076
- 14,487
- 146
No anger for for Covid? The start of it all?I think, maybe, at some level people don't much _care_ what the cause of the inflation is? They just want somebody to make it stop. It probably causes irrational anger that then merges with the (even more irrational) anger about immigration (at least with inflation it's obvious what it is that people don't like about it, the anxiety about immigration - here as well as there - seems much harder to pin down to specifics).
People expect the system to work, and when it doesn't seem to be working they want to lash out (and burn it all down).
In all honesty, I'm partly basing this on 'introspection'. I find myself with very limited tolerance for Starmer's vacuousness and lack of vision (his fondness for soliciting expensive gifts from billionaires really isn't a good look either) . Things are really pretty bad and if he doesn't _do_ something to improve things quickly the electorate is going to get restless.
People have short fucking memories. When Trumpers were denying Russian collusion I kept bringing up this.Surprised?
Russia Hacked Hillary Clinton Computer Hours After Trump Request—Attorney
The Russians moved against Clinton five hours after a Trump press conference in which he said the Russians would be rewarded for handing over Clinton's emails.
Me neither.
People have short fucking memories. When Trumpers were denying Russian collusion I kept bringing up this.
No anger for for Covid? The start of it all?
Yeah, I'm wondering if there's something I can do to work the algorithms so I don't just see one side of issues. I click on some X-tter links here and sometimes see a lot of MAGAs posting shit. I never get that at YT and am thinking Youtube is snowing me.The joys of an algorithm that only cares about keeping you engaged not the quality of the content it serves.
Yeah, I'm wondering if there's something I can do to work the algorithms so I don't just see one side of issues. I click on some X-tter links here and sometimes see a lot of MAGAs posting shit. I never get that at YT and am thinking Youtube is snowing me.
The more I think about it, even in the best case scenario where Harris/Walz win a 319 to 219 (give or take a few EVs ...), I'm thinking this might be a "win the battle but lose the war" type of situation. You're still looking at an election where ~46-47% of the voting public is going to vote for Trump. That's such a rapid negative change in less than a decade. Just an awful statement as to where we really are as a country.
The more I think about it, even in the best case scenario where Harris/Walz win a 319 to 219 (give or take a few EVs ...), I'm thinking this might be a "win the battle but lose the war" type of situation. You're still looking at an election where ~46-47% of the voting public is going to vote for Trump. That's such a rapid negative change in less than a decade. Just an awful statement as to where we really are as a country.
If a brown woman becomes president, I would not consider that losing the war.
If a brown woman becomes president, I would not consider that losing the war.
Trump has basically won on changing our minds on immigrants/ asylum/ tariffs and creating a 47% base that wants fascism and to throw the US constitution in the toilet.
Trump has lost on healthcare/ abortion/ lgbt equality..
The starting lines for both parties will majorly shift after Trump is gone..
Don't forget reconstruction.
And Obama being POTUS created Trump whitelash..
Not unreasonable to think Kamala will create something horrific in 4-8 years which Walz will have to dismantle (which I think he can.. unlike Hillary)
But that's not going to solve the problem. In fact, I'd argue it'll make it worse. If you believe, like I do, that electing Obama is actually what broke the brains of a good chunk of that 46-47%.
I think nominating Hillary broke a lot of those brains as well, no?
I think nominating Hillary broke a lot of those brains as well, no?
They were well-positioned for it, but New Zealand did pretty well?You asking me personally or about everyone? Personally I don't see much point being angry at a virus, and while Johnson's government didn't handle it particularly well (kept flip-flopping and changing approach, constantly opening-up and locking-down again, introducing new sets of rules and different ways of achieving the same result...) neither did any other country.
For people in general I get the impression it's very divided - some are angry at China, some at their own govenrments, and some are angry because they think there was too much lockdown and intervention some because they think there wasn't enough.
I suppose a lot of the inflation is due to the Ukraine invasion, but that just goes to show how much we are at the mercy of random global events. Decades of neoliberalism seem to have made that much worse for the UK. Other countries seem more insulated (in multiple meanings of that word)
FL is typically red. I wouldny read much from that
People overlook that one too much.And Obama being POTUS created Trump whitelash..
Not unreasonable to think Kamala will create something horrific in 4-8 years which Walz will have to dismantle (which I think he can.. unlike Hillary)