Everytime this comes up, the gunslingers run out the right to bear arms. Its true, but it comes with limitations. Every single constitutional right comes with limits and regulations. This fallacy of an argument that a person can walk around with a weapon in any manner is totally wrong. I can't say the judge is right or wrong totally, but he does make a strong point. If the constitution is to be believed and respected for what it says, it should also be acceptable not to add what it doesn't say either.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Exactly which part do you not understand?
Is your argument really that the guys that just fought a war with people that tried to grab their guns, and made it the 2nd friggen amendment to ensure that it couldn't happen again, really meant that you have the right to keep and bear arms only on your own property or some bullshit like that? Really?
Amazingly they have been pretty damn right after all these years. Law abiding folk (the people these laws actually effect) rarely break the (get ready for this) LAW. The other assholes really don't care what laws you pass because they are criminals. Would you like me to copy and paste the webster definition of a criminal?