Jon Stewart on guns and public safety...

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
Im guessing the post you imagine gave me some improved way to support the use of silencers as a way to ward off an invasion of California by out of staters coming to attack with their superior suppressed rifles, a claim I have never made came from post 9 of this thread:


The date on that post was Jan 31 2022 the winter of 2022. Nine months later I posted my views on silencers and nowhere in that was there anything about any worry about silencers and invasion. Post 99 here:

https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...eat-at-all-times.2607683/page-4#post-40871925

I wasn't even interested in the AR platform in Jan 22 until threads like that one peeked my interest in what the deal was about them and I started to study the issue.

So in January of 22 I would not have even know that silencers were banned in California or had any opinion on why it was a bad idea. I doubt I even notices @tweaker2's position. In that same thread I posted about how having rights like gun ownership are conditioned by responsibilities.

So the idea that that post in January was supposed to have given me a better way to support the use of silencers in you creating a lie. Please post where I expressed any opinion before Jan 22 that stakes out ANY position on silencers. I can't find such a post and you won't either. You made that up.

nope, it was in the fall. Maybe, just maybe I’ll care enough to look for it.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
Basically he is basically dismissing all those deaths as irrelevant. Which is admitting they give zero shits about THAT gun violence.

Then minimizing what's left with the stats of other diseases. Basically saying - THIS IS ACCEPTABLE. Basically they are accepting the mass shootings, the domestic violence the school shootings and many murders. Which is basically how I think many gun nuts actually feel. Their thoughts and prayers are nothing but performative nonsense. Deep down all the gun violence is totally ok with them, it's just acceptable collateral damage.

Also this takes absolutely NO injuries from gun violence into account. And that is a BIG NUMBER. Getting shot and recovering does not mean everything is back to normal. These people are victims too, suffering from mental or physical trauma for the rest of their lives - or both.

Gun nutters are trashy people. Evil.
I think it is mostly motivated reasoning to find ways not to accept the obvious but I do agree that people who attempt to discount gun deaths from suicide or crime are odious people.

One of my best friends growing up killed himself with a gun in my 20’s. I strongly suspect he would still be here today if we had sane gun laws but apparently he didn’t count.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nakedfrog

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,395
136
I think it is mostly motivated reasoning to find ways not to accept the obvious but I do agree that people who attempt to discount gun deaths from suicide or crime are odious people.

One of my best friends growing up killed himself with a gun in my 20’s. I strongly suspect he would still be here today if we had sane gun laws but apparently he didn’t count.
If I didn't live in New Jersey I would have offed myself with a gun. I've had some really bad depression that went untreated for a while and if I could have just walked to a store and bought a gun like candy like in the south, really good chance I wouldn't be here anymore.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
If I didn't live in New Jersey I would have offed myself with a gun. I've had some really bad depression that went untreated for a while and if I could have just walked to a store and bought a gun like candy like in the south, really good chance I wouldn't be here anymore.
Yes. My friend walked in to a gun store, bought a gun on his credit card, walked out with it, and shot himself in the chest with it a few hours later.

If there had even been a waiting period he would probably still be alive today. I guess I should have cured his mental illness instead.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,759
126
I think it is mostly motivated reasoning to find ways not to accept the obvious but I do agree that people who attempt to discount gun deaths from suicide or crime are odious people.

One of my best friends growing up killed himself with a gun in my 20’s. I strongly suspect he would still be here today if we had sane gun laws but apparently he didn’t count.
What sane gun laws would have saved him? What killed him was living in a culture that hates the mentally ill because they do not want to see their own by reflection forcing suffering people
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,347
19,505
146
Yes. My friend walked in to a gun store, bought a gun on his credit card, walked out with it, and shot himself in the chest with it a few hours later.

If there had even been a waiting period he would probably still be alive today. I guess I should have cured his mental illness instead.

This is an honest question, not a JAQoff. Would limiting guns actually reduce the suicide rate? I think that may be the logic behind some arguments to not include suicide in the number of deaths used to argue for more restrictions.

Is there data to support this? Any correlation/causation study that is independently duplicated?

Reminder: I support 100% loophole free background checks, licensing and registration.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,066
882
126
OMFG, as much as I hate Apple I may have to subscribe to Apple TV just to see Stewarts show. This guy is so brilliant and I love his way. I wish he would run for president as I would be first on line to vote for him.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
This is an honest question, not a JAQoff. Would limiting guns actually reduce the suicide rate? I think that may be the logic behind some arguments to not include suicide in the number of deaths used to argue for more restrictions.

Is there data to support this? Any correlation/causation study that is independently duplicated?

Reminder: I support 100% loophole free background checks, licensing and registration.
Yes, most suicide attempts come from a unique moment of despair and if you can just sleep it off or whatever will not attempt suicide the next day. This is why suicide prevention organizations strongly support waiting periods.

 
  • Like
Reactions: SMOGZINN

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,759
126
Yes. My friend walked in to a gun store, bought a gun on his credit card, walked out with it, and shot himself in the chest with it a few hours later.

If there had even been a waiting period he would probably still be alive today. I guess I should have cured his mental illness instead.
I have no problem with a 10 day waiting period. It is an annoyance for me because it's a waste of gas and my time, I'm already set up if I decide to kill myself, but thanks to Zen I have no intention of going down that road so, while I am happy to live with that regulation because it can give rash decisions time to pass. California has that restriction as well and you have to pass a safety and California gun law test too.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,727
18,899
136
This is an honest question, not a JAQoff. Would limiting guns actually reduce the suicide rate? I think that may be the logic behind some arguments to not include suicide in the number of deaths used to argue for more restrictions.

Is there data to support this? Any correlation/causation study that is independently duplicated?

Reminder: I support 100% loophole free background checks, licensing and registration.
There's a number of links to other ways to slice the data from within here.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,347
19,505
146
Yes, most suicide attempts come from a unique moment of despair and if you can just sleep it off or whatever will not attempt suicide the next day. This is why suicide prevention organizations strongly support waiting periods.


That provides no data proving a correlation much less causation. Look, I'm not trying to be an asshole but "common sense" and "everyone knows this" is not evidence.

Do suicide rates go down when guns are restricted?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
That provides no data proving a correlation much less causation. Look, I'm not trying to be an asshole but "common sense" and "everyone knows this" is not evidence.

Do suicide rates go down when guns are restricted?
Oh sorry I didn’t understand. Yes, that data is very clear. Massive effects.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,347
19,505
146
There's a number of links to other ways to slice the data from within here.

Yet that raw number ignores any and all confounding factors. It addresses one confounding factor and says "we don't know" if it is the guns, or the culture, i.e, Rurality specifically.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,727
18,899
136
Yet that raw number ignores any and all confounding factors. It addresses one confounding factor and says "we don't know" if it is the guns, or the culture, i.e, Rurality specifically.
Well, it turns out, there's more ways to slice the data from within that report, I wasn't meaning "THIS SINGLE TABLE ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION DEFINITIVELY!" ;)
Other parts of the report touch on restriction of low-lethality methods and high-lethality, takes a look at the suicide rate change when they stopped using coal gas in ovens, etc.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,347
19,505
146
Oh sorry I didn’t understand. Yes, that data is very clear. Massive effects.


OK, that's more compelling. Yet even they say nearly half of all gun suicides bought the gun to commit suicide (person committed suicide with newly purchased weapon). So that dramatically lowers the claimed influence.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,607
46,269
136
I'm on my first 10 day wait as a California resident, truly doesn't bother me. Never had any objection to waiting periods.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,759
126
I'm on my first 10 day wait as a California resident, truly doesn't bother me. Never had any objection to waiting periods.
Anybody determined to kill someone can also wait ten days to do so. The ten day wait helps cool only rash flash in the pan feelings.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,395
136
From being suicidal at some points and talking to suicidal people, there is no doubt a lot of people with even easier access to guns would be dead.

It's amazing that some gun owners are poo pooing about the data on this because they might be inconvenienced by having to wait a week to get a super efficient and portable killing device.

What a wacky country this is. A lack of basic decency
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,508
17,002
136
What sane gun laws would have saved him? What killed him was living in a culture that hates the mentally ill because they do not want to see their own by reflection forcing suffering people

You think creating a culture that puts people above/before guns would change the culture we have now?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,759
126
I think I found your thread. I was searching for Silencers and PPE whereas the relevant terms were Suppressors and Personal Protection Gear:


Please note that my only objection to California's ban on suppressors was that it makes it illegal to protect hearing with the PPE post coming after not before my own objections for the same reason. Nowhere did I mention the inability to use a suppressor in California as having anything to do with any invasion from another state. My objection was always to being forced to use a fixed magazine to if you want full features and the limitation of ten rounds. Either pass a federal law that limits magazine size in all states or remove the California restriction. Either allow full feature 10 round ARs nationally illegal without fixed magazines or remove the fixed magazine rule for Californians. The only thing I agreed to as being a concern with suppressors was in their potential use in decreasing the possibility of getting caught poaching. The thread was from May but I think it's what you had in mind but were mistaken in remembering.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
OK, that's more compelling. Yet even they say nearly half of all gun suicides bought the gun to commit suicide (person committed suicide with newly purchased weapon). So that dramatically lowers the claimed influence.
Why does that lower the influence?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
OK, that's more compelling. Yet even they say nearly half of all gun suicides bought the gun to commit suicide (person committed suicide with newly purchased weapon). So that dramatically lowers the claimed influence.
I think if I had had access to a gun as a teenager I may have killed my self and thankfully I didn’t. I think @MrSquished is saying a similar thing.

Suicide usually happens during a temporary moment of madness and if someone doesn’t have the means at that moment they live, and they are often happy they lived.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaaQ