Flyermax2k3
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2003
- 3,204
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Just cause he doesn't read his own 'holy book' doesn't mean you guys have to be so harsh on him all the time. Pity him for thinking the Jews are wrong in following the rules/laws of the OT, about which Jesus said he had not come to change them, but to enforce them. Everyone knows that means that Christians can do whatever the hell they want to do, rather than following the laws Jesus followed.
And why is it so hard to understand the 'in vain' part? Should the Bible to your opinion refrain from ever writing out a title of god? Is the use of a full title like 'lord' in the Bible using his name in vain? Do you mock him with that? If not, why do you claim anything else you say with his name in it will mock him? (Unless you don't really believe of course)
Can you mock Jesus by using his full name instead?
Are you referring to me with the above? This part was utter nonsense: "Pity him for thinking the Jews are wrong in following the rules/laws of the OT, about which Jesus said he had not come to change them, but to enforce them. Everyone knows that means that Christians can do whatever the hell they want to do, rather than following the laws Jesus followed.." You have no idea what my practices are nor what the whole of my beliefs are. I have stated *many* times on these forums my belief in following the Mosaic Law and have even quoted the exact passage you are referring to. Matthew 5:17-18 "17 Think not
that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fufilled."
Do *you* understand what "in vain" means? I have already explained what it means in previous posts, perhaps you should go look it up...